2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

5th gen IP and 20091/2 mustang IP

Old Feb 3, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #46  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
I can't disagree, I like what I have seen of the Commodore interior,and thought it would have been nice in the Camaro; but I am sure I will get used to the "uniqueness" of the 5th gen.
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #47  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Oh...UH...how do you know that? It's just a picture. Have you driven it? Have you touched it?
i know you were j/k .. but i'm pretty sure the comments on having sat in the car or not were in reference to exactly how hard and distracting it is to glance down at the console guages on the camaro... none of us have actually sat in them and seen exactly how inconvenient, or not, it is to have guages there.. for all we know it may be just a quick glance of the eyes, where they wouldnt be off the road any longer than if those guages were in the main cluster

as for those guage clusters posted above.. they all are pretty generic IMO.. one thing i know i DO like a lot about the Camaro is the speedo/tach cluster i think it looks pretty cool and i love that theres nothing like it being made right now.. (as i've said.. its the radio/hvac area that isnt so hot imo)
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 12:05 AM
  #48  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by FS3800
(as i've said.. its the radio/hvac area that isnt so hot imo)
That whole center stack is probably the most offensive part to me.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 12:07 AM
  #49  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
You guys will agrue over anything wont you?

If you're hardcore into racing wouldn't you be putting real gages in anyway? All the ones from the factory will be computer buffered and not the most acurate. At 100+ mph do you really care if your buse voltage is at 13.9 or 14.2?

How is HUD making up for a deficency? It is simply a better way of getting the vehicals information to the driver. IMO the only reason for conventional gages in moden cars is to apease those who resist change.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #50  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
While the AMG panel may lack a couple of readouts, it emphatically proves the "less is more" theory.
The pure simplicity of the mono-coloring and cleaness of the panel is timeless!
The Boxter cluster reminds me of a Malibu.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 06:16 AM
  #51  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by 90rocz
I think people who buy sports cars do like to be able to monitor all their vitals at a glance, especially volts in cars with a lot of electronics.
You can see when you need to clean or tighten battery terminal from watching abnormally low voltage drops at red lights etc. before you run the battery down.
Originally Posted by 90rocz
While the AMG panel may lack a couple of readouts, it emphatically proves the "less is more" theory.
The pure simplicity of the mono-coloring and cleaness of the panel is timeless!
I put your two statements together to help you see the inconsistency. Which is the holy grail then? "less is more", or "all the vitals"?
Originally Posted by Black5thgen
I don't understand how so many people from this site have been able to sit in a mule and look at the gauges, then drive the car and see how they function. Oh wait nobody has been able to do this, they just all assume from a ****ty cell phone picture that the gauges will be hard to read. How many people bashed this car from photos at the auto shows then posted how "you have to see this car in person to appreciate it". And these were pictures from good digital cameras with great auto show lighting. I really don't think this car was built with the intention that the majority of people will be looking at the gauges while driving on a road course. I would bet my 5th gen fund that the gauges will be easy to read and prominant. Plus I think that judging by how big the info center between the gauges are that a digital read of any gauge will be able to be displayed there. How about every stops complaining for 8 monthes (because I don't see major designes like the interior changing now) and waits for the final product. It seems like the people talking about the new mustang already have their mind made up and should go frequent the corral instead of
Agreed. I don't know what can be shown in the DIC... but it has a lot of space in there and is dot matrix. But I also agree this car, in this price bracket, it not primarily meant as a track car. It's classic affordable 2+2 muscle, with tributes to Camaro heritage. The Corvette is the track car of the Chevy stable.
Originally Posted by george.jetson
People who drive 110 mph on road courses don't CARE what their exact oil pressure is. They -- we -- ONLY care if it's low. Every one of those sports cars above has a nice big red idiot light (and probably an audible alarm) that will come on if things start to go wrong.

What I need most when I'm on track is a tach I can read REALLY EASILY and that oil pressure idiot light. A temp gauge is good to have too, particularly at club track-day type events in the summer. Beyond that, I don't care. On the street, that temp gauge is somewhat more important and obviously a speedo is very important. None of the rest matters much
Yep, and well said
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Question IS?..what has Camaro typically done in its 40 years?

It's one part of Camaro, or F-Body's heritage that a lot of us LOVE!..
By that yardstick then the new Camaro is just as true as ever. In fact according to that measure, I could make a case the new one is MORE true to heritage then the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th gens, due to the location of its instruments ...but regardless... fact is it does still retain a dedicated set of full gauges.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
That whole center stack is probably the most offensive part to me.
No kidding? Well that is news to me
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #52  
95firehawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 694
From: Brighton, IL
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
I put your two statements together to help you see the inconsistency. Which is the holy grail then? "less is more", or "all the vitals"?

Agreed. I don't know what can be shown in the DIC... but it has a lot of space in there and is dot matrix. But I also agree this car, in this price bracket, it not primarily meant as a track car. It's classic affordable 2+2 muscle, with tributes to Camaro heritage. The Corvette is the track car of the Chevy stable.

Yep, and well said

By that yardstick then the new Camaro is just as true as ever. In fact according to that measure, I could make a case the new one is MORE true to heritage then the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th gens, due to the location of its instruments ...but regardless... fact is it does still retain a dedicated set of full gauges.

No kidding? Well that is news to me
Heaven forbid that anyone talks bad about the new Camaro. I mean what where they thinking? Don't they know that this is a Camaro site? Maybe these people should go out and buy a Mustang! Let's just go ahead and ban anybody who says anything remotely negative about the new Camaro. This way only positive things will be stated, which in turn, will start new and exciting discussions.

Give me a break! To tell someone that they don't need analog gauges to tell them their engine's vitals or that they will be okay with a HUD display is completely absurd. It's their personal preference! How can anyone say that someone else is wrong just because they stated their OPINION?

I don't like the idea of having gauges that aren't in my line of sight nor do I like alarm clock like numbers on my windshield. I don't want some idiot light to chime in and tell me something's wrong when I could have noticed an analog gauge's needle quivering or slowly dropping. I want to be able to catch any problems before the computer does. You're not going to do this with an idiot light nor are you going to catch this in your peripheral vision if the gauge is somewhere down by your right knee.

With that being said will I or won't I buy the new Camaro? I will reserve my final judgement for when I get behind the wheel of one. I will say that because of the interior layout if I do get one it will be more of a dedicated track car than it would a DD or a weekend cruiser. I dunno maybe I should just go out and buy a Mustang instead. Maybe everyone who has just the slightest negative feeling for any aspect of the car should. Then everything will be alright.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #53  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by 95firehawk
Heaven forbid that anyone talks bad about the new Camaro. I mean what where they thinking? Don't they know that this is a Camaro site? Maybe these people should go out and buy a Mustang! Let's just go ahead and ban anybody who says anything remotely negative about the new Camaro. This way only positive things will be stated, which in turn, will start new and exciting discussions.
Free speach is allowed here. Critics have a right to post their opinions like everyone else - including you, when you criticize mine. But you're right, this is a Camaro site, catering more to Camaro fans. If someone really doesn't like the new Camaro, and posts over and over what they don't like about it, then yes, maybe that person would be happier in a Mustang.
Give me a break! To tell someone that they don't need analog gauges to tell them their engine's vitals or that they will be okay with a HUD display is completely absurd. It's their personal preference! How can anyone say that someone else is wrong just because they stated their OPINION?

I don't like the idea of having gauges that aren't in my line of sight nor do I like alarm clock like numbers on my windshield.
I guess the USAF, USN and US Army have got it all wrong then. They don't need HUD's! Just a bunch more round dials and text displays to read through while their eyes are looking outside the cockpit, where they should be.
I don't want some idiot light to chime in and tell me something's wrong when I could have noticed an analog gauge's needle quivering or slowly dropping. I want to be able to catch any problems before the computer does.
Good luck trying to react faster than today's powertrain and body controller modules. You might have great reaction times... but you haven't a prayer in trying to be quicker than one of these.
With that being said will I or won't I buy the new Camaro? I will reserve my final judgement for when I get behind the wheel of one. I will say that because of the interior layout if I do get one it will be more of a dedicated track car than it would a DD or a weekend cruiser. I dunno maybe I should just go out and buy a Mustang instead. Maybe everyone who has just the slightest negative feeling for any aspect of the car should. Then everything will be alright.
I hope you do wait until the new Camaro is out for you to test, before deciding. In the meantime, feel free to post whatever you want to say
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #54  
steves's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Free speach is allowed here. Critics have a right to post their opinions like everyone else - including you, when you criticize mine. But you're right, this is a Camaro site, catering more to Camaro fans. If someone really doesn't like the new Camaro, and posts over and over what they don't like about it, then yes, maybe that person would be happier in a Mustang.
I think we all have our right to post what ever we want on here, and I am just as big of a Camaro fan as you are. I would think, so is every one that posts here. I have an opinion and I am gonna state it just like you do and I dont try to skew things in my favor. For example when posting all those "plain" ugly insturment panels how come you didn't include the pics of the 5th gen IP for comparison? You also forgot to include the IP from a car made by the same company...Corvette. Which has a readable and good looking IP.....maybe a little "plain" for your liking. FYI I am a true Camaro enthusiast but I am gonna buy what I like, just as I have in the past.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #55  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by ChrisL
thats not a word... its an acronym.

Originally Posted by Dictionary.com
ac·ro·nym /ˈækrənɪm/
–noun
1. a word formed from the initial letters or groups of letters of words in a set phrase or series of words, as WAC from Women's Army Corps, OPEC from Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or loran from long-range navigation.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #56  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by steves
I think we all have our right to post what ever we want on here, and I am just as big of a Camaro fan as you are. I would think, so is every one that posts here. I have an opinion and I am gonna state it just like you do and I dont try to skew things in my favor. For example when posting all those "plain" ugly insturment panels how come you didn't include the pics of the 5th gen IP for comparison? You also forgot to include the IP from a car made by the same company...Corvette. Which has a readable and good looking IP.....maybe a little "plain" for your liking. FYI I am a true Camaro enthusiast but I am gonna buy what I like, just as I have in the past.
It would not be fair to post the cobbled, blurry spy pix of the 5gen IP in the same context as professionally shot pix of production interiors on those other cars.

As for the Corvette - sure it has a lot of guages. But that's not the norm, as I've shown already. Plus it does have a HUD too
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:10 AM
  #57  
steves's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
It would not be fair to post the cobbled, blurry spy pix of the 5gen IP in the same context as professionally shot pix of production interiors on those other cars.

ok.....
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #58  
nexus6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 131
From: Dallas AKA Hell
im going to hold off giving a decision until i sit in a production model,if i dont like it , ill just buy a vette . or a Trailblazer SS........
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #59  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Damn, that makes you go WTF? Corvette or Trailblazer

I cant think of two vehicles that would be more polar in choice than those two?
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #60  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast:
I put your two statements together to help you see the inconsistency. Which is the holy grail then? "less is more", or "all the vitals"?
I guess I should've clarified, it was clear in my head.
Posted by Me:
......."The pure simplicity of the mono-coloring and cleaness of the panel is timeless!".......
I was speaking from a design perspective, not function, or content.
The AMG was very conservavitve, smooth radiuses, crisp clean edges and lines, pleasing proportioning, precise clear digital readouts, font etc..
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
By that yardstick then the new Camaro is just as true as ever. In fact according to that measure, I could make a case the new one is MORE true to heritage then the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th gens, due to the location of its instruments ...but regardless... fact is it does still retain a dedicated set of full gauges.
Another misscommunication.
Howabout...(insert)..."for most of its 40 years"....b/c the 1st gen vitals were optional. Once knee deep in racing, Camaro began to look the part.

Originally Posted by george.jetson
People who drive 110 mph on road courses don't CARE what their exact oil pressure is. They -- we -- ONLY care if it's low. Every one of those sports cars above has a nice big red idiot light (and probably an audible alarm) that will come on if things start to go wrong.

What I need most when I'm on track is a tach I can read REALLY EASILY and that oil pressure idiot light. A temp gauge is good to have too, particularly at club track-day type events in the summer. Beyond that, I don't care. On the street, that temp gauge is somewhat more important and obviously a speedo is very important. None of the rest matters much
I have to disagree, I have shut down more than one run when oil pressure was below normal, but not low enough to trigger an idiot light.
By then it's usually too low and too late.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.