2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

400-plus-hp, 6.0-liter V-8 or a 300-plus-hp,3.6-liter V-6

Old Mar 21, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #46  
Northwest94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 511
From: Mill Creek, WA
Another great read regarding rated HP on GM LSX engines.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1974770
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #47  
notgetleft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 808
From: manassas, VA
It's pretty basic physics for why hp loss will increase with power throughput. There is both a constant, linear, and even second and third order factors to consider. Speed, torque and acceleration all matter.

Proof? Are you unable to spin a transmission by hand? Do you think you can generate 13hp with your hands on a little shaft?

The 4 cylinder type examples are relevant too. Unless you think a 100hp 4 cylinder needs a minimum of 50% throttle to begine to even move a V8 drivetrain.

I think trying to figure exact engine output from 'corrected' dyno sheets is a big waste of time, especially different dynos on different days in different air with different chassis and different sensors for temp / baro / humidity
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 01:51 AM
  #48  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Nope, I don't buy the percentage either. IMHO, a typical V8 will lose ~50 HP through a street-style manual transmission drivetrain -whether it is a stock 205 HP 5.0, or a stock 400 HP LS2. Perhaps a bit more with the higher HP, and a bit less with the lower HP, but not double/half.

I agree. I have always though along these lines but did not have the support to back my theory and never felt like arguing. It only makes since. If you swap engines in a car the loss of power could be greater/less but it would depend on a few factors. What if anything changed about the drivetrain other then the engine? How much weight if any has the setup added? Other then a few things the percentage should remain close to the same as you suggest.
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #49  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
That was a pretty good read on corvetteforum. I think the percentage numbers, especially 15-20% are a bit overplayed, especially on the higher horsepower modded cars. I think the bulk of the drivetrain loss comes from spinning the mass inside of it and as such unless you are accelerating it a lot faster you won't notice much power difference. So basically I don't think that when we are discussing cars with power and gearing that are within the realm of the street that these 2nd, 3rd, or 4th order terms to the drivetrain loss probably matter at all... which really means that they are likely on the order of a few horsepower and probably within the range of hte error in the dyno and a wash anyway.
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #50  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Numbers that matter most to me are weight vs trap speeds. A good indicator of potential lies in the trap speed. Dyno's are good for getting maximum power. Nothing wrong with a nice dyno sheet to supplement arrogance but they dont mean everything.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rvonsternberg
Cars For Sale
2
Sep 14, 2015 11:58 AM
CLEAN
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
84
Feb 19, 2003 12:20 PM
Burmite
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Nov 7, 2002 01:35 AM
WERM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
30
Oct 14, 2002 02:45 PM
z28projects4ever
V6 Tech
2
Aug 26, 2002 12:10 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.