he said 0-40 in 4 crack head

 

Umm...mine does it in the 8s

 

ive done it from a stop..counted out loud too..
1-1000
2-1000
3-1000
....

got to 8 when i actually reached 60 mph.

 

Next time I go racing there is going to be a guy lining me up and instead of a tree and timing lights, he will simply lift his arm up and the other guy at the end of the track will start counting into a loud speaker as soon as he sees the starting line guy's arm go up....one one thousand, two one thousand, three thousand....

Get a G-tech or equiv or go get a timeslip which you can figure out the times.

 

Thats about were mine is. About were is your turbo charged monster Tiago? close to 7 maybe

 

Hehe,mine ran a 0-60 of 8.2 on a G-tech.I ran both directions on the same street and 8.2 was the average.This was after my old 3.4 was modified and showed 15.6 on the G-tech.Sorry,the only time-slip I had from a real track was before I went overseas and lived on a tiny island (Azores,Portugal).I ran a 14.3 on the juice with only a home-made cold air and a muffler as bolt-ons.So,no I don't think 3.4's are slow
Kevin

 

just cause you cant count past 3 doesnt mean you have to be jealous and vindictive.

i dont need super-scientific measurements to make sure that my car runs 0-60 in 8 seconds. if you do, well..whatever. kudos to you i guess...

whatever. my car runs 0-60 in 8 seconds. i have a 1994 3.4L V6 Camaro with a 5-speed transmission.

o yea, and if you dont like my reply...well..life sucks, get a helmet.

-R

 

bout 5 secs

 

You finished with that thing yet?You need to get it tuned and get it to the track! 3.4 engines
Kevin

 

it is tuned, Im installing a 255lph high pressure intank fuel pump on it in the next few weeks, dynoing on nov 9th.

I'll hit the track whenever the weather around here gets good and I have time...

 

how much did it cost to add that turbo?

 

I did all the work myself, parts aren't cheap for good quality stuff.

 

Just so you don't get any crazy ideas with that 3.4l look at my website so you can see what not to do with a 3.4l engine. However Tiago did the same but built his motor afterwards I myself have given up with v6's.

 

I thought the purpose of the high octane fuels was to RESIST KNOCKING, shouldnt 87 be quicker burning?

 

try not ot resurrect threads without a good reason. but yes, 87 octane will generally burn a bit faster than 93. thats why you should use the recommended octane for your engine, not the highest.