V6 vs V6
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Camaro5port:
Man..Ryan., Does this race mean alot to u...lol, how much u guys racing for.lol, just messin... anyways i go for 4 u...CAMARO All the WAY!
</font>
Man..Ryan., Does this race mean alot to u...lol, how much u guys racing for.lol, just messin... anyways i go for 4 u...CAMARO All the WAY!
</font>
------------------
94 3.4L Camaro A4 (Stock)
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Joshs99BlackBeauty:
hmmm...Id like to know who came up with that idea of less than .5 red lighting. I dont uderstand that though because if it takes you say .001 seconds to react to a light doesnt that say that you went after the light was on? Maybe im not looking at it right but oh well.
</font>
hmmm...Id like to know who came up with that idea of less than .5 red lighting. I dont uderstand that though because if it takes you say .001 seconds to react to a light doesnt that say that you went after the light was on? Maybe im not looking at it right but oh well.
</font>

Kevin
I am with Kevin on the reaction time...partly...I know without a doubt all pro trees are .400 - Anything less on them is a red light...If you don't believe me, just watch the NHRA guys go at it. If they all hit between .400's and .500's consistently and are getting paid for it, and that is slow, a lot of people would be in for a job as John Force...however, different lights do have different times, and few actaully have .000 as a perfect time that I have seen, either way, below the perfect time is a red light. Sorry to rave about this on your post Ryan, and good luck, I'm pulling for you and your Camaro!
Some pro trees are .400, some .500.
Full trees can be .000 or .500.
Who knows what else is out there.
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
Full trees can be .000 or .500.
Who knows what else is out there.
------------------
1996 Z28 Camaro
2001 best 1/4 BFG DR's NA - 11.865@113.57 w/1.634 60', 1/8 - 7.563@89.82mph Best 1/4 MPH 114.82 - Best 1/8 MPH 90.73 - 2002 Mid 11's NA, Mid 10's n2o
1989 GMC 1500 truck for work 18.1@73 305
8 cats to feed clean after 1999 V6 Mustang 5 speed
15.358@89.47 MPH w/ 2.227 60'
15.364@90.92 MPH w/ 2.383 60'
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by robvas:
Bone stock, a 3.4 Camaro won't beat a new V6 Cougar
A Cougar is about the same speed as my Grand Am, maybe a tick faster
</font>
Bone stock, a 3.4 Camaro won't beat a new V6 Cougar
A Cougar is about the same speed as my Grand Am, maybe a tick faster
</font>
Kevin
[This message has been edited by nikkev (edited August 05, 2002).]
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by nikkev:
Nice to see you still trolling the V6 boards!I think his 3.4 will take the Cougar.Don't forget that the 3.4 has 200lb-ft of torque and that's what gets the car moving.The Cougar has what,120?Anyway,the 3.4 can easily be driven to 15's with intake and exhaust and that's about where the Cougar should be.So I think it'll be a good one.Lest us know how the race goes.
Kevin
[This message has been edited by nikkev (edited August 05, 2002).]</font>
Nice to see you still trolling the V6 boards!I think his 3.4 will take the Cougar.Don't forget that the 3.4 has 200lb-ft of torque and that's what gets the car moving.The Cougar has what,120?Anyway,the 3.4 can easily be driven to 15's with intake and exhaust and that's about where the Cougar should be.So I think it'll be a good one.Lest us know how the race goes.
Kevin
[This message has been edited by nikkev (edited August 05, 2002).]</font>
------------------
94 3.4L Camaro A4 (Stock)
This is the most active post to have been on this board in a while...wow, maybe next week I should build up a race against a new VW Beetle Turbo 
[This message has been edited by 94BlackBowtie (edited August 06, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by 94BlackBowtie (edited August 06, 2002).]
One of my friends is getting a 2000 Cougar V6, I have a 3.8 1997 Camaro Convertible with a flowmaster exhaust. Will I be able to beat him in a street race (probably not over 80 mph) Who will be faster at the start of the race?
------------------
http://www.cardomain.com/id/marky822
------------------
http://www.cardomain.com/id/marky822
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Marky82:
One of my friends is getting a 2000 Cougar V6, I have a 3.8 1997 Camaro Convertible with a flowmaster exhaust. Will I be able to beat him in a street race (probably not over 80 mph) Who will be faster at the start of the race?
</font>
One of my friends is getting a 2000 Cougar V6, I have a 3.8 1997 Camaro Convertible with a flowmaster exhaust. Will I be able to beat him in a street race (probably not over 80 mph) Who will be faster at the start of the race?
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by nikkev:
Nice to see you still trolling the V6 boards!I think his 3.4 will take the Cougar.Don't forget that the 3.4 has 200lb-ft of torque and that's what gets the car moving.The Cougar has what,120?</font>
Nice to see you still trolling the V6 boards!I think his 3.4 will take the Cougar.Don't forget that the 3.4 has 200lb-ft of torque and that's what gets the car moving.The Cougar has what,120?</font>
I suggest you weld some thicker flages on those 3.4 RKSport headers, lot of people who didn't experienced leaks due to flange warping.
And really man, get those mods on a race this dude! I'm tired of waiting for the outcome!

------------------
--David--
1995 white Firebird 3.4 V6 A4 w/ T-tops
Mods:Kenwood KDC516S stereo, front and rear Alpine speakers, Flowmaster 80 series, Firebat and Autografics decals, Moroso CAI, Rally Foglights, Painted interior (Silver Metallic), 3 10" MTX Thunder 6000 subs, BMR STB, Zaino, !speed, !horsepower Help CT get a dragstrip!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by TheV6Bird:
How is robvas trolling? Anyway, the V6 Cougars have 165tq or something like that.
I suggest you weld some thicker flages on those 3.4 RKSport headers, lot of people who didn't experienced leaks due to flange warping.
And really man, get those mods on a race this dude! I'm tired of waiting for the outcome!
</font>
How is robvas trolling? Anyway, the V6 Cougars have 165tq or something like that.
I suggest you weld some thicker flages on those 3.4 RKSport headers, lot of people who didn't experienced leaks due to flange warping.
And really man, get those mods on a race this dude! I'm tired of waiting for the outcome!

</font>
, dont worry im gonna post this race outcome on the V6 boards soon enough. Its just been raining around here and plus I should have those mods on my car by next week. Oh and thanks , im definetly gonna get those flanges !! I heard alot of stories about the Rksport headers already . thanks ------------------
94 3.4L Camaro A4 (Stock)
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by TheV6Bird:
How is robvas trolling? </font>
How is robvas trolling? </font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Robvas:
Race, get it over with, and let us know what happens.
Better yet, take it to the track, that way we can blame it on driver when one of you loses. </font>
Race, get it over with, and let us know what happens.
Better yet, take it to the track, that way we can blame it on driver when one of you loses. </font>

Kevin


