Does taking out the airfilter help any at the track?
Does taking out the airfilter help any at the track?
I am trying to think of very basic stuff I can do to save a lil bit of time...like cleaning and washing the car...iced intake...is the air filter worth taking out?
is it stock paper?
Might help... on my CAI though I have expereinced more nights wtih losses then gains. Which is wierd.
I once even rigged up a scoop with no filtre ran bad times, took it out off and put filter back on ran .3 better, consistenly.
As long as your track isn't too dusty I would not worry to much. Just keep up on your oil changes.
Might help... on my CAI though I have expereinced more nights wtih losses then gains. Which is wierd.
I once even rigged up a scoop with no filtre ran bad times, took it out off and put filter back on ran .3 better, consistenly.
As long as your track isn't too dusty I would not worry to much. Just keep up on your oil changes.
GM High Tech Performance tested the Camaro V6 at the drag strip with the filter off. I've highligthed the specs and results.
215mm tires, an open 3.08 differential. You should be aiming for 15.3
At the drag strip, the Camaro's pushrod V6 really shined. A let's-get-acquainted 15.23/89.5 was followed by a 15.37/90.3, 15.41/89.8 and a 15.47/89.2, with the engine getting successively hotter from being hot-lapped. With the air filter out and the serpentine belt off, the V6 responded after a cooldown with a 15.03/91.0 and a 15.15/90.3. We did notice that above 4000 rpm the exhaust sounded noticeably restrictive; this leads us to believe that major gains in horsepower--perhaps as much as 10 percent--could be made with just a larger catback exhaust. This would put our test Camaro in the 14s without removing the air filter or belt. Still, we think low 15s going through in third gear with an open rear and a small radial tire is absolutely fabulous given the Camaro's budget status.
Give the V6 some gear, a catback exhaust, a small pair of slicks and a 10-minute tune-up and this budget bomber can knock down modular-motored Mustang GTs all day long. And while some diehard Ford fans are perfectly welcome to argue with this biased opinion, we already know of at least one automatic V6 F-body that is running 12.80s in NHRA Stock Eliminator.
Give the V6 some gear, a catback exhaust, a small pair of slicks and a 10-minute tune-up and this budget bomber can knock down modular-motored Mustang GTs all day long. And while some diehard Ford fans are perfectly welcome to argue with this biased opinion, we already know of at least one automatic V6 F-body that is running 12.80s in NHRA Stock Eliminator.
i took mine out at the track and got a little gain(but i have an ss hood and airbox) on a normal intake i dont know if it would make much of a difference. i would definately pull that belt off though.
Jsut warning about pulling the belt, my motor at WOT heats up almost as quick as my tach goes.
I never ran it at the track, but I did abotu an 1/8th mile pass, it is AWESOME! but I do not trust a full 1/4, yet alone a full 1/4 plus burnout and and getting the car off the track so you can put the belt on to get your timeslip. I don't rember how the belt setup is on a 3.8L but maybe you can run a short belt to run the crank and waterpump only?
I cannot do that since I have 3.4L and the crank runs opposite the waterpump. If I did my waterpump would run in reverse, and cause some havoc.
I never ran it at the track, but I did abotu an 1/8th mile pass, it is AWESOME! but I do not trust a full 1/4, yet alone a full 1/4 plus burnout and and getting the car off the track so you can put the belt on to get your timeslip. I don't rember how the belt setup is on a 3.8L but maybe you can run a short belt to run the crank and waterpump only?
I cannot do that since I have 3.4L and the crank runs opposite the waterpump. If I did my waterpump would run in reverse, and cause some havoc.
On my '93 3.4 A4, I've found it to be worth .1-1.5 or so to remove the whole air cleaner assembly and just run the TB wide open. I've verified this a few times on back to back runs. I also found that the TB bypass and gutting the cat to be worth .2 I haven't tried no belt or a short belt yet but I'm planning it soon. My car went 16.5 the first time I ran it and I've got it down to 16.11 with free stuff, no aftermarket parts, stock exhaust. I think with the short or no belt I can get it to run 15's, all stock parts. I also cut out the center of the thermostat so it circulates all the time and have the foglight switch is now controlling the cooling fan (I don't have foglights anymore). One other thing I did is pull both bumper supports and the pass side airbag and module, raceweight is 3260 w/ driver, all interior is still there. I plan on getting rid of the ABS module soon too. It's still a really slow car no matter what, but I've had fun messing with it. I have another car that's fast.
Even though the chance of getting something into the engine is small, I wouldn't risk it personally. Is the negligible gain worth risking major engine damage? It is up to you.
-Adam
-Adam
Ive probably ran my car without a filter for a couple thousand miles LOL.... it happend on accident.
but I tested this out on a 96 Z28 last week, dynoed a K&N FIPK at 305 rwhp and hten took the filter off of it and it dyoned 311 rwhp, didn't gain any tq, but 6 rwhp! the FIPK was also brand spakin new!
but I tested this out on a 96 Z28 last week, dynoed a K&N FIPK at 305 rwhp and hten took the filter off of it and it dyoned 311 rwhp, didn't gain any tq, but 6 rwhp! the FIPK was also brand spakin new!
well i was thinkin if there is a gain maybe jsut take it off and run a screen across the hole just so nothing big can get in there??? i dunno if that would be smart and also it would have to be clamped so it dont get sucked in that would suck
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Darth Xed
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
5
Jul 1, 2002 03:22 PM



