My LT1 Vs. Another SRT-4
So basically muscle is a domestic v8 that doesn't cost that much, except when it's a collectible that can be worth six figures. Muscle can be big cubes from the 60s, a wheezy smogger from the 70s, a weak fuelie from the 80s, or part of the 90s muscle resurgence. This is separate from the pony/muscle car classification.
No matter its power output it just can't have fewer than 8 cylinders. The guy in the SRT4 can be packing 600hp but it's inferior to a 305-powered rustbucket because it's not "muscle". I could take my 93 Grand Marquis, install some spray, open exhaust, and a high stall converter and that'd be considered muscle. Gotcha.
No matter its power output it just can't have fewer than 8 cylinders. The guy in the SRT4 can be packing 600hp but it's inferior to a 305-powered rustbucket because it's not "muscle". I could take my 93 Grand Marquis, install some spray, open exhaust, and a high stall converter and that'd be considered muscle. Gotcha.
So basically muscle is a domestic v8 that doesn't cost that much, except when it's a collectible that can be worth six figures. Muscle can be big cubes from the 60s, a wheezy smogger from the 70s, a weak fuelie from the 80s, or part of the 90s muscle resurgence. This is separate from the pony/muscle car classification.

Every car can be made fast with enough money. But not every car can be american muscle! And the SRT-4 is NOT american muscle no matter how much HP it's putting out. It doesn't look like muscle and it doesn't sound like it either.
Wrong. All you would have is a quick grocery getter, not a muscle car. The 93 Grand Marquis was not born a muscle car and thus can never be one.
By that logic then the Camaro, Mustang, and Challenger aren't muscle either. They are American Pony not American Muscle. The only thing close to being modern American Muscle is the Z06. Now if they were to put the LS7 into the Camaro then it would be a different story. But since they didn't its no more American Muscle than the SRT-4 is. Can't go bending the rules because you like the Camaro and dislike the SRT-4.
I sense an underlying bitterness towards the SRT-4 due to the fact that its more economically efficient to get it to run mid 12's than our cars.
I sense an underlying bitterness towards the SRT-4 due to the fact that its more economically efficient to get it to run mid 12's than our cars.
Muscle cars are mid size to large vehicles. SRT-4 is smaller and light weight.
Muscle cars are RWD. SRT-4 is FWD.
Muscle cars look fast and bold. SRT-4 looks like a Neon.
Muscle cars have V8's with nice exhaust rumble. SRT-4 has and sounds like a 4 cly with a turbo.
The SRT-4 is not and never will be a muscle car. Just because you think of it as a muscle car doesn't make it one by definition.
Hence why I bought a muscle car and not a 4 cyl turbo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM



