Well I feel pretty good about my times, what do you guys think? I got 2 runs in.

R/T .004
60' 2.203
1/4 13.792
MPH 103.08

That was first run and had absolutely no problems with traction so I thought i would try to launch a little harder. Not sure what my rear end can handle.

R/T -.220
60' 2.103
1/4 13.636
MPH 102.85

so that was my only 2 runs, might go back tonight and launch a little harder I am thinking i can hit a 13.5 maybe dip to a 13.4?

This is a 1994 Corvette 6 speed, only thing done to it is CAI and Borla mufflers.

 

IMO them are good times. get a 1.9 60 and u could possibly pull off a 13.2.

 

so are lt1 corvettes really that much faster than lt1 camaros? or is it a driver difference.

 

I personally don't think they are that much faster but my C4 seems to be running a lot better than my 97 Z... although i have not got my 97 down the track without it running like crap... although the vette is almost stock compared to my Z..

 

i know my car is modded but i ran a 97 ZR1 vette from 20-80 mph and had 3 car lengths on him. both auto's

 

Good trick, no 97 ZR1s and no autos in ZR1s either...

 

Exactly. Sounds like the guy was bsing you. If you were to run a ZR1 you would be behind 3-4 cars at 80, from there it would only get worse as the 32v LT5 loves to run up top.

 

then it wasnt a ZR1, becuase he said it was an LT1. it was just the one with the ground effect package. maybe Z51?
i wasnt trying to make up a race. just going by the badge i remember on the car which i thought was ZR1 and i know it had an LT1 not LT5.
this happened less then a year ago and the kid just got cuz his grandpa died and it only had 10,900 miles on it and mint. only had a catback exhaust.

 

Hmm wasnt a 97 then either.. thats c5 ls1 corvette so.. who knows what year you raced..

 

like i said, the kid just got it. it was mint and looked new.I should have known that the 97 was a C5, not C4. sorry for my idiocy.
back to thread topic, lol.

 

good times no doubt