I was joking.... sheesh. I thought you know me better then that by now... hell, I've been on this board for who knows how long now muahaha.....

 

I figured you were but I was covering my bases just in case

 

heck even a stock 96-98 Cobra should be able to walk away from a stock LT1,if properly driven.

 

Ha ha, Chris was right, you guys are full of it. It's pretty funny, you seem to have no problem believing Scott when he says he has an article about a heads/cam mustang laying down 320rwhp. I can't wait to tell him about that.

Oh, and just so you guys know, I was at the track when he ran his TA with the flowmaster, his first run was a 14.0 @ 105. And yeah, he did eventually run a 13.7 that evening. And as far as his power with the vortech, I didn't see the dyno run, but that car is crazy fast now. I can't wait till he finishes his turbocharged stroker for the car, that's going to be insane.

Still, thanks for the laughs. More power to the underpowered mustang!!! hahahahaha

 

Scott is right, for all the naysaying Chevy redneck, 2 i.q. morons. Gosh, there are a lot of them lately in here aren't there? I have the magazine at work. I can reference it tomorrow if anybody cares. It was 1 or 2 months ago in 5.0 Mustang magazine. You may even find it online at www.50mustangandsuperfords.com It was Anderson Ford Motorsport that did the testing. It is here. www.andersonfordmotorsport.com Just click on project vehicles.

 

You were talking about the slowest versions of the GTs in recent years, the '96-'98s. How convenient for you. Shall we talk about the V8 RS Camaros of the 80s and 90s? I don't think you want to. Those things were pathetic for a V8 performance car.


Whatever. Then why is the Mustang still around and the Camaro gone? I guess the Cobras from '93 on suck, right?


You could not call in sick even once in the past couple of years to run at the track? Also, I bet a lot of people would like to see your car do that 13.7 at 106 with the cat-back only. Put it back to that form of mods and let's see it in person. Again, how convenient that it was many mods ago and no proof.

Good riddance!

 

This is probably the same guy with the 7 psi blower. Go away newbie troll!

 

LOL....sometimes I just can't help talking like a teenager. It's Sunday, I'm bored, so here goes.

I'm sure he is sorry for doing that. I'll try and keep it in mind too, Junior.

That "garbage" motor is now putting Mustangs into the 8's on ported stock heads using the stock block. Do you understand what kind of power that takes?

Whatever credibility you might have once had just went down the proverbial tube. 99+ GTs are rated at 260 and routinely make 225-235 RWHP stock. You incorrectly used 96-98 225 HP SOHC numbers. Oops.

Then neither is your LT1. As has been stated many, many times, a bone stock 99+ GT M5 is a great race for a bone stock LT1 M6. You can stick your head in the mud and pretend it isn't so all you want. Then again, when all you have is magazines, TV, and the internet to fall back on, what is one to do?

Actually, it's an overmatch. Also, the IRS is a liability in a drag race. A better match is a 96-98 Cobra. My 98 Cobra ran 13.6 104 mph in 100% bone stock trim - including filter. What did your car run in 100% bone stock trim?

Remember my talking about credibility above? You just lost some more. Tell me....what does "having more torque" have to do with it? Do you understand what HP is? Ever heard of torque * rpm and what that does? Do you race at 3000 rpm?

Bueller?

I suggest continuing to get all your info from those two souces. We need the cannon fodder.

If you're skeptical, I'm probably convinced. If you're convinced, I'm most definately skeptical. Get the picture?

However, lets go back to the credibilty thing. You're once again looking at the older, 96-98 stuff (even though Vortech doesn't make a 6-8 psi kit). The 99+ GT kit (we are talking about 99+, right?) is rated by Vortech at 364 HP.

FYI - the numbers Vortech gives are not RWHP - they are flywheel.

LOL. You just slammed yourself and you likely don't even realize it. Why? Because you don't know what you're talking about, as has been shown in this post.

FYI...magazines, the internet, and TV can be useful references, but they are not the end all.

I hear Wal Mart is running a special on glasses that cure brand-blindness. You should go check em out, Junior.

I suspect you won't be. Let's see.

I believe that you haven't run your car at the track. We're doing good so far.

Oh well, it only lasted one line. 106 with only a catback? You either....

a) Have the worlds most powerful stock LT1
b) Used a G-Tech to get that mph
c) Are lying through your teeth

"I'll take c) for a thousand dollars, Alex"

Prove it, Junior.

Well thank you. I will think what I will, and I doubt you're done. But time shall tell.

You have a wonderul day.

Next....

Is there any pimple-faced kid on this site that DOES NOT have a car that isn't going to have a "turbocharged stroker for his car"? I'm sure he's having wet dreams about it, but then again, I had those too when I was 15 years old.

Mr Newbie troll....before anybody is going to believe you, you have to have some credibility. Go to www.dictionary.com and look it up, then come back when you've found some.

And you have a wonderful day too, ya hear?

 

PS....I'm not anti-Fbody at all (I've had 3) - I'm just anti-ignorance.

 

The 96-98 mustangs run low 15's, and an lt1 runs low 14's, so unless the driver of the lt1 is horrible I can't see that happening. Because My buddy has a 95 3.8 with cat-back, 3.42's, and cai and we walk those things daily. Not trying to go against mustangs I like them but I am just telling you the experiences I have had.

 

Hey Slick, might want to re-read that post. There is a 5 letter word in there that might be of interest, and it's not GT

 

I tell you the experience I had with my 98 when it was bone stock to the air filter. 14.2@97 mph. Yes, that's a 98 GT/SOHC. That is only my experience though, results may vary.

 

And I find it funny that you with no posts and just registered are in here defending him. I am willing to bet that you 2 are one in the same.

 

So you are trying to claim that a 305 hp Cobra is only running low 15's My buddies 96 was running 8.8 at 82 in the 1/8th bone dead stock after he learned how to drive the damn thing. Yep, a 3.8 is going to beat that

 

Obviously I was talking about a gt. But anyways about the cobras. A stock 96 cobra vs. a stock 96 ss.... The SS has the advantage so I still think it is hard to say that a 96-98 cobra can with the right driver walk any lt1.