Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

lt1 vs. ls1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #16  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Now thats not to say I think LS1's are slow ... Im just saying ... Anything is possible. Especially on the street.

And maybe the guys LS1 wasnt running right? You would be amazed at the number of people who have these cars and neglect them... its sickening.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 04:58 AM
  #17  
95Z28Camaroman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 100
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

I have a question for you that would explain it.

Did your alarm clock go off at the end of the race and wake you up for work!

No I just kidding! there are alot of people who can't drive a stick shift so I suppose it possible!

We almost never see stick shift American cars at the drag strip in the UK we all use Auto's
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #18  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Originally Posted by HardcoreRM125
Not all LS1's are the rockets people think they are. I beat a TA with just headers, cat back, and CAI. By 3rd I had about 2 car lengths on him and was still pulling. I shut it down at about 90. But I honestly think that by 100 I would have stopped pulling him. In the long run, say past 100, he would have probably had me? But the car lengths I did pull, I got through 2nd gear. So I was winding out where the LS1 should have started to walk on me ... This was a stock A4 ... Or at least it sounded like it didnt even have a catback on it. Driver was an older guy ... Probably a little mroe experience than me, but beatin an LS1 is not THAT out of the question.

ALOT of people cant drive a stick. ALOT ... and if he was slow on the 203 shift, its possible he picked more cars up on the top end than everyone would expect. Bad shifting makes a HUGE difference.
A few points here. First off, beating any given car is never out of the question. There are three main reasons why one car beats another car in a drag race.

1). The car that wins was just faster. low 12 second car beats low 13 second car or whatever.

2). The driver of the losing car botches the launch/shifts and loses due to driver error.

3). The car that loses had mechanical failure.

So it's of course possible for a 10 second car to lose to a 15 second car when 2, 3 or both take place. But this kill wasn't reported like that. He claims that he botched the launch (badly I might add) and said nothing about the LS1's launch or shifting (leaving us to assume it was decent). Yet he still pulled on the car with more power

And my final point is this. I owned a stick shift for three years and it only took me about a week to get good at shifting. M6 guys like to poke fun at autos with all thier little comments about "stab and steer" and "I like to actually driving my car". That's all well and fine but as a former stick driver I can say with 100% certainty that pushing a clutch and shifting a car is NOT rocket science. Anyone with half a brain and a little practice can get good at it. That's not to say everyone will become an expert power shifter or become comparable to the famous Evan Smith. But anyone with a functioning right arm and left leg can get good enough to drive thier car to most of it's potential (for example a 12.8 second car could have most drivers at least pulling very low 13's).
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #19  
HardcoreRM125's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,628
From: Pgh, PA
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

This is true ... He did botch the launch good ... I was just saying though, anything is possible on the street but when you think about it that way, it doesn't look good lol. Maybe the LS1 was running slow/rough or something ...
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 04:54 AM
  #20  
95_formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

I have had one encounter with an ls1 car. A 98 TA m6 with what the owner said was piston slap raced my brothers 92 305 tbi with full bolt ons, cam and gears. The 98 was fully equpied and had a 250 pound passanger + a 165 pound driver and the 92 had just a 140 pound driver and the race wieght of the 92 is 3350 and the 92 edged out the 98 in a dig to problibly 85mph. Then later that night me in my stock 95 formula m6 raced the 92 from a 50mph roll and I started to slowly pull away. So that particular ls1 car that had some extra wieght and pistion slap did lose to car it prolibly would have killed if it didn't have piston slap. Piston slap sounds like a pretty big problem but the driver claimed it was normal for ls1s.

BTW the owner of the 98 didn't have the car very long but did look like he could launch it decently.
Old Jun 11, 2006 | 07:21 AM
  #21  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Originally Posted by 95_formula
I have had one encounter with an ls1 car. A 98 TA m6 with what the owner said was piston slap raced my brothers 92 305 tbi with full bolt ons, cam and gears. The 98 was fully equpied and had a 250 pound passanger + a 165 pound driver and the 92 had just a 140 pound driver and the race wieght of the 92 is 3350 and the 92 edged out the 98 in a dig to problibly 85mph. Then later that night me in my stock 95 formula m6 raced the 92 from a 50mph roll and I started to slowly pull away. So that particular ls1 car that had some extra wieght and pistion slap did lose to car it prolibly would have killed if it didn't have piston slap. Piston slap sounds like a pretty big problem but the driver claimed it was normal for ls1s.

BTW the owner of the 98 didn't have the car very long but did look like he could launch it decently.
1). Piston slap is considered "normal" although not all LS1's have it (mine does'nt).

2). Piston slap only occurs during a cold start up and after a few minites (when the engine gets to a normal operating temp) it goes away and the car sounds and perfoms perfectly normal.

3). Piston slap does not make one LS1 slower then another.

4). Piston slap is NOT a big problem but many consider it annoying.

5). If all 3 of you raced from a 50 MPH roll that LS1 (properly driven) would have walked away from both of you.
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #22  
95_formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

I know most ls1s would beat my 95 and my brothers 92 but this ls1 didn't. If piston slap is as normal as you say it is then something else must have been wrong because he was a lot slower then most the ls1s out here. I think the driver said he heard it "piston slaping" all the time but I don't remember exactly.
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #23  
frankthetank078's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 120
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

you all take such damn offense cause i say my lightly modded LT beat an LS and just so u all no and LS6 doesnt compare to an LS7 the engine has a totally dif. set up and only makes 360 horse second im not just saying my car was faster then his im saying.....my car + me is faster then his car + him i dont tihnk the kid knew how to drive but the point is i steal beat him in a race so....you cant come up to someone after a race and say "ur cars slower then mine i just cant drive"
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 01:49 AM
  #24  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Originally Posted by darrens99formul

5). If all 3 of you raced from a 50 MPH roll that LS1 (properly driven) would have walked away from both of you.
It wouldnt have walked away it would have ran away. Wouldnt have been a race. I love these BS stories.

Please keep them coming. I am having a bunch of friends over and this crap will entertain then for hours.
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #25  
95_formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

I KNOW THAT a properly runing properly driven stock ls1 would hand me and my brothers asses to us, but this one didn't. Why is that so ****ing hard to belive.
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 04:32 AM
  #26  
95_formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Its kind of funny that ls1 owners can't belive that an ls1 that was clearly not running right got edged out by a car only .5-.7 slower, in a race that lasted less than a 1/4 mile.

Ya know ls1 cars do lose every now and then dont ya.
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #27  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Originally Posted by 95_formula
I know most ls1s would beat my 95 and my brothers 92 but this ls1 didn't. If piston slap is as normal as you say it is then something else must have been wrong because he was a lot slower then most the ls1s out here. I think the driver said he heard it "piston slaping" all the time but I don't remember exactly.
He could have problems inside his motor or his AFR could be off enough to hurt his performance. But if he's too stupid to get his car looked at then I'll have no sympathy for him if and when his motor goes south.
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 11:43 AM
  #28  
mustangmuncher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 388
From: Northeastern Ohio
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

I honestly can not understand the reasoning everyone has about lightly modded LT1's.. especially geared/stalled/built tranny LT1's beating stock/near stock LS1's.. Give it a rest, yes the LS1 can lose, and ive seen LS1's trap 101, 102.. they dont all trap 105ish either. I like the LSx family, but the LT1 was the last of the 350's and has just as much potential as an LSx, the LSx just has a better starting ground due to the 15* heads, rockers, etc. And to the guy who said his stock ls1 pulled away on a cammed LT1 with some other stuff.. thats real
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #29  
darrens99formul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: lt1 vs. ls1

Originally Posted by mustangmuncher
I honestly can not understand the reasoning everyone has about lightly modded LT1's.. especially geared/stalled/built tranny LT1's beating stock/near stock LS1's..
Too general of a statement. What if a A4 LT1 with a CAI, stall and 3.73 gears raced a 2001/2002 M6 LS1 with lid from a dig to say 120 mph? I would still expect the LS1 to win all day long. But on the other side of the fence what if you had a M6 LT1 with every single bolt-on go against a stock 98 A4 LS1? I would expect the LT1 to win all day long.

Specifics Bob. Lets get specific.

Originally Posted by mustangmuncher
Give it a rest, yes the LS1 can lose, and ive seen LS1's trap 101, 102.. they dont all trap 105ish either.
And I've seen LT1's trap 97. It's all about the year, transmission and location as to what these cars will trap. You want to point out the worst possible scenario then what about the best? I believe 108 is the best trap from a stock M6 01/02 LS1. But 103-106 is definately more the "norm".

Originally Posted by mustangmuncher
I like the LSx family, but the LT1 was the last of the 350's and has just as much potential as an LSx, the LSx just has a better starting ground due to the 15* heads, rockers, etc.
Better starting ground, better heads, easier to work on, ect. The worlds fastest LS1 is in the high 6's. The worlds fastest LT1 is very low 8's. Not that I'm bragging since I don't own either car

Originally Posted by mustangmuncher
And to the guy who said his stock ls1 pulled away on a cammed LT1 with some other stuff.. thats real
I'm on the fence with this one. If it's any kind of a decent cam with a decent tune then I agree with you that it's BS. If it's somethimg pathetic like a hotcam then I can see this being possible if the LS1 has some basic bolt-ons.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM
LT1runner
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
5
Aug 3, 2002 05:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.