can i beat a mach 1? (lt1)
can i beat a mach 1? (lt1)
I'm just wondering...
i see some are running 13.3 or something stock, but i hear stock they are low 14 cars...
i have intake/cutout/a4 (3.23)
what would happen???
i guess dead even or something??? or will i get owned...
i pull on GTs like they arent moving so... :P
i see some are running 13.3 or something stock, but i hear stock they are low 14 cars...
i have intake/cutout/a4 (3.23)
what would happen???
i guess dead even or something??? or will i get owned...
i pull on GTs like they arent moving so... :P
Originally posted by jthomas
i dunno... i hear that they are about as quick as a stock ls1. mt tested the m5 at 13.2 and the a4 at 13.88. that is pretty quick in my book.
i dunno... i hear that they are about as quick as a stock ls1. mt tested the m5 at 13.2 and the a4 at 13.88. that is pretty quick in my book.
Why can't I find out how much they weigh? Can't find it on Ford's site.
I see that it has 305HP and 320 ft/lb of TQ. The rear diff is also a 3.55. That helps a little, but I don't see it running 13.1 and trapping 106 stock with those numbers. Doesn't sound stock to me unless they are HIGHLY underrated.
Dan
I see that it has 305HP and 320 ft/lb of TQ. The rear diff is also a 3.55. That helps a little, but I don't see it running 13.1 and trapping 106 stock with those numbers. Doesn't sound stock to me unless they are HIGHLY underrated.
Dan
Originally posted by stereomandan
Why can't I find out how much they weigh? Can't find it on Ford's site.
I see that it has 305HP and 320 ft/lb of TQ. The rear diff is also a 3.55. That helps a little, but I don't see it running 13.1 and trapping 106 stock with those numbers. Doesn't sound stock to me unless they are HIGHLY underrated.
Dan
Why can't I find out how much they weigh? Can't find it on Ford's site.
I see that it has 305HP and 320 ft/lb of TQ. The rear diff is also a 3.55. That helps a little, but I don't see it running 13.1 and trapping 106 stock with those numbers. Doesn't sound stock to me unless they are HIGHLY underrated.
Dan
Originally posted by jthomas
not to be a smartass or anything, but that IS what they run with a good driver... there are a few mach 1 owners that post on ls1.com. the mach 1 motor is up on power just about everywhere in the rpm band over the 2001 cobra motor.
not to be a smartass or anything, but that IS what they run with a good driver... there are a few mach 1 owners that post on ls1.com. the mach 1 motor is up on power just about everywhere in the rpm band over the 2001 cobra motor.
I really don't care how it compares to a '01 cobra, to be honest. I'm wondering how they are getting times like that with 305 HP, because I know stangs aren't light. I'm still very doubtful of a 13.1 sec 106 mph 1/4, STOCK.
Dan
Originally posted by stereomandan
I really don't care how it compares to a '01 cobra, to be honest. I'm wondering how they are getting times like that with 305 HP, because I know stangs aren't light. I'm still very doubtful of a 13.1 sec 106 mph 1/4, STOCK.
Dan
I really don't care how it compares to a '01 cobra, to be honest. I'm wondering how they are getting times like that with 305 HP, because I know stangs aren't light. I'm still very doubtful of a 13.1 sec 106 mph 1/4, STOCK.
Dan
The Mach I is underrated.
I've seen charts on LS1.com of guys laying down around 280HP and 305TQ bone stock. So I would guess that would give the motor around 320HP/345TQ.
Also, the Mach I is not a low 14 sec. car, the GT is.
The '01 Cobras are mid-13 cars and the Mach I is mid-to-low 13s.
These cars are basically a tick behind the LS1.
I've seen charts on LS1.com of guys laying down around 280HP and 305TQ bone stock. So I would guess that would give the motor around 320HP/345TQ.
Also, the Mach I is not a low 14 sec. car, the GT is.
The '01 Cobras are mid-13 cars and the Mach I is mid-to-low 13s.
These cars are basically a tick behind the LS1.


