2000 SS Vs. Blown 99+ GT
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by white97z/28
OK dyno graphs don't lie I agree, but running 14 psi on a stock 4.6 single overhead cam motor seems a little overkill to me. Who knows? Basically what im saying is that 14 psi on an ls1 would be more hp than that of the gt. Chevy is better!
OK dyno graphs don't lie I agree, but running 14 psi on a stock 4.6 single overhead cam motor seems a little overkill to me. Who knows? Basically what im saying is that 14 psi on an ls1 would be more hp than that of the gt. Chevy is better!
Registered User
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 424
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Leave it to a thread started by Dan to turn into a flame fest
. Good death, and congrats on gradumating
. We got to hang out here pretty soon, my turd bucket should be back together in the next 2 weeks then I need to get it tuned on the dyno to see whats up with it. Again congrats!
. Good death, and congrats on gradumating . We got to hang out here pretty soon, my turd bucket should be back together in the next 2 weeks then I need to get it tuned on the dyno to see whats up with it. Again congrats!
Registered User
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally posted by darrens99formul
Good death.
And I find it humorous that your being given a hard time for not losing badly enough
Good death.
And I find it humorous that your being given a hard time for not losing badly enough
LOL no kidding, what is this guy thinking? he should have lost by an entire 1/8th mile and lose with dignity!
good races.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
From: Loveland, CO
Well the only thing I have to say is that this is CamaroZ28.com, not Mustang Gt.com. So if you Mustang guys don't like what is being posted, go somewhere else. I am not trying to be a jerk, but this is a chevy site. So DEAL with it!!!!!
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4
From: Loveland, CO
Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque. They have over 140 dyno runs and it didn't go POP. It ET'ed really bad but he was limping so as not to break it and trapped 135 through the quarter. Now let see a 99-+ GT do that! Ford guys, they never learn.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by EvilEric98Z
Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque. They have over 140 dyno runs and it didn't go POP. It ET'ed really bad but he was limping so as not to break it and trapped 135 through the quarter. Now let see a 99-+ GT do that! Ford guys, they never learn.
Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque. They have over 140 dyno runs and it didn't go POP. It ET'ed really bad but he was limping so as not to break it and trapped 135 through the quarter. Now let see a 99-+ GT do that! Ford guys, they never learn.
. Some Chevy guys, ignorant morons!
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by LeadSled1
4.6 SOHC and blower = Slow.
Mkay?
4.6 SOHC and blower = Slow.
Mkay?
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
I have personally tuned many 380-430rwhp/380-450rwtq Mustangs floating around my area. Pretty dang common in my opinion. Also have tuned some LS1 cars, some made good power, but they do not make the rwtq and give up a good chunk of weight to the Mustangs.....
There are some rather ignorant members floating around...
"Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque. They have over 140 dyno runs and it didn't go POP. It ET'ed really bad but he was limping so as not to break it and trapped 135 through the quarter. Now let see a 99-+ GT do that! Ford guys, they never learn."
Dude, shut the hell up...Camaro site, Mustang site, what was your point? Stock...yeah, did you read the article...NOPE...would not be spouting your garbage if you would have!
There are some rather ignorant members floating around...
"Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque. They have over 140 dyno runs and it didn't go POP. It ET'ed really bad but he was limping so as not to break it and trapped 135 through the quarter. Now let see a 99-+ GT do that! Ford guys, they never learn."
Dude, shut the hell up...Camaro site, Mustang site, what was your point? Stock...yeah, did you read the article...NOPE...would not be spouting your garbage if you would have!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13
Originally posted by EvilEric98Z
Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque.
Oh and btw, if you go to QuarterMilePerformance.com, they have a stock 125,000 mile Formula LS1 with their turbo kit making over 775 horse and 865 lb/ft of torque.
not saying it's not possible and that they're lying or anything...just that i wouldn't be trying for that kind of boost on my stock LS1 motor. nor would i want to be running race gas all the time in my daily driver to the tune of 25,000 miles per year.
this is an extreme case on a project car belonging to a performance shop. it's not what every guy in an LS1 shoots for in his stock block that's not real friendly to boost.
Last edited by gt40; May 25, 2004 at 10:40 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
Originally posted by Steve Y
What do you drive that is so fast? There is a heads, cams, etc. 2000 GT that runs 11.7 at 116 w/o a blower, nitrous and with stock displacement. What do you think a blown 4.6 could do?
What do you drive that is so fast? There is a heads, cams, etc. 2000 GT that runs 11.7 at 116 w/o a blower, nitrous and with stock displacement. What do you think a blown 4.6 could do?
Geeze, I guess all the guys with supercharged 4.6 GTs who are running less than 11.7s just plain suck then Steve.
That is a specific built car. Since you want to go that way, what do you thing a heads, cam etc LS1 runs? I ran only 5/10ths and 5 mph slower than that with a minimal bolt on LS1 on stock tires. Big whoopty.
FYI, it was a sarcastic responce to:
Originally posted by 1BadAzzGT
With my stock 98 engine + Vortech "S" @ 8psi = 298rwhp (5 speed) pretty pathetic, eh?
With my old stock 2000 engine + Vortech "S" @ 8psi = 343rwhp/336rwtq (automatic).
New engine plus 12+ psi .... who knows
With my stock 98 engine + Vortech "S" @ 8psi = 298rwhp (5 speed) pretty pathetic, eh?
With my old stock 2000 engine + Vortech "S" @ 8psi = 343rwhp/336rwtq (automatic).
New engine plus 12+ psi .... who knows
Since I have helped Tim with his car and he is a friend.
I have personally beat a supercharged 96-98 GT in a L98 convertable Vette and a couple of 99+ supercharged GTs in a bolt on LS1. I was also beaten by a 99 GT with a vortech other mods by about a car with another board member riding along. (97ChameleonTA) He was also there when the 96-98 GT called me out in the staging lanes and when I ran a Saleen S281.
A supercharged GT or a Fbody is a good way to get down the 1/4 quick. Just different ways of doing it.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by LeadSled1
Geeze, I guess all the guys with supercharged 4.6 GTs who are running less than 11.7s just plain suck then Steve. That is a specific built car.
Since you want to go that way, what do you thing a heads, cam etc LS1 runs? I ran only 5/10ths and 5 mph slower than that with a minimal bolt on LS1 on stock tires. Big whoopty.
FYI, it was a sarcastic responce to:
Since I have helped Tim with his car and he is a friend.
I have personally beat a supercharged 96-98 GT in a L98 convertable Vette and a couple of 99+ supercharged GTs in a bolt on LS1. I was also beaten by a 99 GT with a vortech other mods by about a car with another board member riding along. (97ChameleonTA) He was also there when the 96-98 GT called me out in the staging lanes and when I ran a Saleen S281.
A supercharged GT or a Fbody is a good way to get down the 1/4 quick. Just different ways of doing it.
Geeze, I guess all the guys with supercharged 4.6 GTs who are running less than 11.7s just plain suck then Steve.
That is a specific built car. Since you want to go that way, what do you thing a heads, cam etc LS1 runs? I ran only 5/10ths and 5 mph slower than that with a minimal bolt on LS1 on stock tires. Big whoopty.
FYI, it was a sarcastic responce to:
Since I have helped Tim with his car and he is a friend.
I have personally beat a supercharged 96-98 GT in a L98 convertable Vette and a couple of 99+ supercharged GTs in a bolt on LS1. I was also beaten by a 99 GT with a vortech other mods by about a car with another board member riding along. (97ChameleonTA) He was also there when the 96-98 GT called me out in the staging lanes and when I ran a Saleen S281.
A supercharged GT or a Fbody is a good way to get down the 1/4 quick. Just different ways of doing it.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 182
From: Earleville, MD
Originally posted by Steve Y
People are bagging on blown 99+ GTs and calling them slow. They will woop a stock LS1 every day of the week. So what does that make the stock LS1?
People are bagging on blown 99+ GTs and calling them slow. They will woop a stock LS1 every day of the week. So what does that make the stock LS1?
A stock car that it took another car a supercharger to beat?
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by LeadSled1
A stock car that it took another car a supercharger to beat?
A stock car that it took another car a supercharger to beat?