02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by ztwenty8
"Yep, that rice burner made in Normal, Illinois, powered by a Dodge 2 liter and Dodge transmission..." - johnm
actully just to let you know that when it is a turbo it is a mitusbishi 2 liter and when it is non turbo it is a dodge 1.8
actully just to let you know that when it is a turbo it is a mitusbishi 2 liter and when it is non turbo it is a dodge 1.8
I'm full of useless trivia like:
- If you see a 90-91 Talon, it's either 2.0 NA FWD or turbo AWD. They didn't offer it in the 1.8 liter FWD nor the 2.0 turbo FWD until 1992.
- Turbo Lasers still had the cheap seats. Swapping with an Eclipse or Talon gives you much nicer seats.
- The 1.8 liter in 90-94 is also Mitsu. The 95-99 NA cars used a Dodge 2 liter, except for the non-turbo Eclipse Spyder. It used a Mitsu 2.4 liter from the Galant for the extra torque in the heavier car. NA Spyders also had the dual-tipped exhaust used on the turbo models.
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by dmlong
Those diesels are a lot of fun to mod. My truck will put a couple of lengths on my T/A every time. Its getting pretty hard to find anyone in my small town that will even try to run with me anymore.
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Its an 01 4wd ex cab with a Banks six-gun tuner and the speed-loader add on. Also has the 4" Monster exhaust and big-head wastegate along with CAI.
I've also installed a propane kit but its not dialed in yet. The thing pulls REALLY hard but unless its in 4wd it doesnt hook up til 4th gear.
I'm starting to worry about frying the trans but so far its been o.k.
I've never had the truck to the track but my T/A runs 13.9s and the truck will walk all over it.
I've also installed a propane kit but its not dialed in yet. The thing pulls REALLY hard but unless its in 4wd it doesnt hook up til 4th gear.
I'm starting to worry about frying the trans but so far its been o.k.
I've never had the truck to the track but my T/A runs 13.9s and the truck will walk all over it.
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by John M
I'm full of useless trivia like:
- If you see a 90-91 Talon, it's either 2.0 NA FWD or turbo AWD. They didn't offer it in the 1.8 liter FWD nor the 2.0 turbo FWD until 1992.
- The 1.8 liter in 90-94 is also Mitsu.
- If you see a 90-91 Talon, it's either 2.0 NA FWD or turbo AWD. They didn't offer it in the 1.8 liter FWD nor the 2.0 turbo FWD until 1992.
- The 1.8 liter in 90-94 is also Mitsu.
http://www.autotrader.com/research/m...year=1990&y=15
and your two statements contradict each other.
Last edited by zachisageek; Dec 9, 2004 at 02:34 AM. Reason: gramar
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
In 1997, GM and Isuzu agreed that Isuzu is mainly responsible for diesel engine development for GM.
Did DMAX, Ltd do any engineering? Looks like just production:
In the U.S.A., DMAX, Ltd. was set up jointly by Isuzu and GM to manufacture diesel engines.
Hell, GM sells Isuzu trucks as their medium-duty vehicles.
Anyway, way off topic. Just was curious about the Isuzu-GM effort into diesels.
-B
Did DMAX, Ltd do any engineering? Looks like just production:
In the U.S.A., DMAX, Ltd. was set up jointly by Isuzu and GM to manufacture diesel engines.
Hell, GM sells Isuzu trucks as their medium-duty vehicles.
Anyway, way off topic. Just was curious about the Isuzu-GM effort into diesels.
-B
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by zachisageek
then explain my friend's 90 fwd turbo talon....
http://www.autotrader.com/research/m...year=1990&y=15
and your two statements contradict each other.
http://www.autotrader.com/research/m...year=1990&y=15
and your two statements contradict each other.
The two statements do not contradict each other. The 1.8 liter was offered on DSMs in 90-91, just not in the Talon.
Regarding GM/Isuzu - that they work together on diesel engines is great. I just can't get past GM putting that Chinese inline-5 in their latest midsize trucks.
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by CamaroKid813169
does it really f*****g matter, i mean c'mon it's a damn rice burner, a drunk guy on a bicycle could take on a ricer, and win blow it away
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Originally Posted by CamaroKid813169
oh no im only 16 i dont know what im talking aboutn however i've been racing for 6 years i may know just a little
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
In about 4 years or so, you'll realize how little you really knew about anything back when you were just 16. The worst kill I've ever been the victim of was at the hands of a "rice burner" -- a Talon GST that ran a 12.2
to my 12.9 or so. It was running race gas and large boost levels, but as far as I could tell, it was otherwise a full interior car. A very similar car smoked me when I was in my '95 Z28. May have well been the same guy, but the beating in the '95 was a few years ago. My current car and sole mod is in my sig.
Bottom line is that I've spanked quite a few American cars, but got soundly spanked by what I might have assumed was a "ricer" if I had seen it on the street. Even at the track I had no idea that the guys car ran low 12s. I don't assume anything anymore. Anyone that wants to run might have a very fast car (or truck) regardless of the brand badging.
to my 12.9 or so. It was running race gas and large boost levels, but as far as I could tell, it was otherwise a full interior car. A very similar car smoked me when I was in my '95 Z28. May have well been the same guy, but the beating in the '95 was a few years ago. My current car and sole mod is in my sig.Bottom line is that I've spanked quite a few American cars, but got soundly spanked by what I might have assumed was a "ricer" if I had seen it on the street. Even at the track I had no idea that the guys car ran low 12s. I don't assume anything anymore. Anyone that wants to run might have a very fast car (or truck) regardless of the brand badging.
Re: 02 Duramax vs. 95 Eclipse
Do you know what punctuation marks are?


