Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Spohn torque arm...Is this normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Spohn torque arm...Is this normal?

Just installed a used but very good condition Spohn torque arm. I have the model that bolts to the chassis. The pivot has a poly bushing on one end and a ball end on the other:


The arm is installed what I believe to be correct, I have zero drive line vibes so the u-joint angles are correct and the pivot piece is straight up and down. All fasteners are very tight.

Here is the problem:
I can feel and hear road bumps from the rear end more
I can feel and hear drive line slack in both directions more
In 5th and 6th gear at low RPM's, I can feel something weird in the back

It feels like someone banging on the floor with a dead blow hammer. It is not severe, its just something that was not there prior to the Spohn TA.

Is this normal?
Anything I can do to minimize this?
Thanks
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #2  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Even if you have it set-up correctly you will have more road noise and feel the shifts more. Mines an auto, so I only have a little thump when I first take off.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 01:40 PM
  #3  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Is this due to the "slop" in the ball joint. The ball joint I have is in great shape but, however it has the normal clearances required for proper operation.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Is this due to the "slop" in the ball joint. The ball joint I have is in great shape but, however it has the normal clearances required for proper operation.
The only thing I can quess, is that the noise is related to the front mounting point and the way it must move under accel/decel. When you give it a fair amount of gas pedal, does it feel like the back of the car is doing the anti-squat thing? If so, I believe you have it set-up correctly.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
You're going to feel more road vibration.
It's the downside to chassis-mounted torque arms.
I've had the same issue with both my BMR setup (on my 95) and Spohn (on my 93)

Your exhaust is not bouncing off of it is it?
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #6  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
The exhaust is fine, plenty of clearance. Well I am glad to hear that it is normal.

I wonder if the ball end can be replaced with a poly bushing just like on the other end of the swivel link? Maybe some thin but durable insulators can be sandwiched between the chassis mount and the chassis?
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #7  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by wrd1972
I wonder if the ball end can be replaced with a poly bushing just like on the other end of the swivel link? Maybe some thin but durable insulators can be sandwiched between the chassis mount and the chassis?
Sure, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of having a chassis-mounted
torque arm on there?
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #8  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by James Montigny
Sure, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of having a chassis-mounted
torque arm on there?
Possibly, but this is not an all out race car.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #9  
Projectz28's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,713
From: Cinnaminson, NJ
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Possibly, but this is not an all out race car.
then you probably bought the wrong type of tq arm for your application. It sounds like you would probably be happier with a traditional trans mounted arm to keep the noise down.

Its kind of the point to a chassis mounted tq arm... its very rigid and solid so it transfers vibrations and noise.

If you dont like it then you should probably sell it and go with a trans mounted arm. Just installing a poly mount will defete some of the purpose of a chassis mount and will probably not quiet it down that much.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #10  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Thanks guys, I only gave $200 for it so its not a loss. I am sure I will get use to it.

Last edited by wrd1972; Aug 19, 2007 at 07:12 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 10:22 PM
  #11  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,110
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
When you say "ball end", do you mean you bought the "rod end" on the torque arm? If so, you had a choice between the rod end and a conventional poly bushing. The poly will definitely be quieter, but not completely silent. Once you hook the arm to the floor pan, you can feel everything that happens to the rear axle. I think I can guess the approximate backlash in the gears at this point, because the more backlash you have, the bigger the clunk I get when I put the TH400 in gear. To me, the rod end version of the arm is not a problem as far as noise, but then with duals dumping under the car, and nothing more than Borla XR-1's for mufflers, most noises are hidden by the exhaust.

Last edited by Injuneer; Aug 19, 2007 at 10:29 PM.
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 07:05 AM
  #12  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Injuneer,
Yes I mean the "rod end". It came on the arm when I bought it used. Your statement makes perfect sense to me.

I am going to experiment with some thin rubber washers at the bolt holes, by keeping the insulators thin it should not badly impact performance. I totally understand that any above a thin insulator will absorb power but even at the worst it could not be as bad as the stock TA.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #13  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Okay, i have now gotten used to it.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
user 647483's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Okay, i have now gotten used to it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Henson071
Parts For Sale
8
Dec 30, 2015 09:55 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 01:26 PM
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
Jul 28, 2015 07:32 PM
surreybrad
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jul 5, 2015 10:36 PM
Noer
Parts Wanted
0
Jul 4, 2015 05:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.