Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Adjusting Spohn torque arm.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2007, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
LT1 POWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,830
Adjusting Spohn torque arm.

So I'm in the process of adjusting my pinion angle and I need to know if the front mount is supposed to be exactly above the lower mount (attached to the crossmember mount), like seen her.

LT1 POWR is offline  
Old 10-03-2007, 06:05 PM
  #2  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,696
Yes, with the suspension at normal ride height, the side links should be vertical.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 08:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
This topic came up before and I adjusted mine as short as it woud go. But the side links are still aiming towards the front of the car slightly.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 11:51 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
always faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Solar system/earth/canada/quebec
Posts: 873
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
This topic came up before and I adjusted mine as short as it woud go. But the side links are still aiming towards the front of the car slightly.

Mine too
always faster is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 01:47 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
The swivel link should be perpendicular (up & down) relative to the top bar of the torque arm. If it is not (swivel links slanted) then the torque arm will either try to bias the rearend either forward or rearward during acceleration or deceleration depending on what direction and how severly it is off. This will also cause some binding and weaken or damage the torque arm or other things.
When the swivel links are aligned correctly there will be zero binding and zero unwanted force being applied to the rear-end.

Recently I decided to replace the metal ball joint with the poly bushings to reduce the clunk noise, which it did very well I might add. This required the ball joint to be removed from the torque arm and be replaced with an "eye" type end that holds the two poly bushings. When the new end was threaded all the way in the alignment was going to be off toward the front causing the swivel links to face forward a good bit. This would be bad if left that way. I had to cut about 3/8" off the tip of the torque arm to shorten it some and it is now perfectly aligned.

"Z-rated94" and "Always faster", you guys should consider doing this.

Last edited by wrd1972; 10-05-2007 at 01:59 PM.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 02:00 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Well thats go'in to be another pain in the butt. What kind of 60 ft. times are you cutting? I really can't complain about the 1.65's.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 02:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
Well thats go'in to be another pain in the butt. What kind of 60 ft. times are you cutting? I really can't complain about the 1.65's.
Have not been to the track yet so I have no clue what my 60 is, but there is a right way and a wrong way to adjust the Spohn TA for proper operation.

I would not want to mess this up considering the amount of force and movement that the track arm must "control" under race conditions behind a high performance SBC. BTW I had my TA off in less than fifteen minutes, not that hard to do.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 02:07 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
I understand your point. But it would have been nice to have the proper adjustment requirements from the get go. Don't get me wrong, I love this piece of workmanship.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 05:38 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
LT1 POWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,830
Even with the upper torque arm bar fully shortened, it is still slightly too long to be perfectly above the lower mount.

I don't know if I can loosen the 4 crossmember bolts and try to slide it towards the front of the vehicle a few millimeters or what.

Now on the pinion angle, my driveshaft points down (\) near the rear of the car at -1º and the front of the rear differential points down (/) toward the front of the car at a +1º. It does make a "V" pointing down and I think it is set up correctly. So the equation (-1)-(+1)=-2 would be the correct pinion angle, correct? You want there to be a 2º difference between the driveshaft angle and the differential angle, right?
LT1 POWR is offline  
Old 10-05-2007, 09:31 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
Sounds like you did it right. And I too, go for no more then -2.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
01-29-2016 05:56 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
2
08-24-2015 06:41 AM
Slayer
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
08-17-2015 03:55 PM
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
07-28-2015 07:32 PM
Noer
Parts Wanted
0
07-04-2015 05:13 PM



Quick Reply: Adjusting Spohn torque arm.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.