Bush and not the good kind
Originally posted by BlackRocketZ
Sorry, but you are wrong. We need no approval to protect the US. Its assets or allies.
We have been more than gracious in our handling of the situation. We have given Saddam plenty of time to comply with the UN resolutions.
3000 dead in the US and no real payback.
Sorry, but you are wrong. We need no approval to protect the US. Its assets or allies.
We have been more than gracious in our handling of the situation. We have given Saddam plenty of time to comply with the UN resolutions.
3000 dead in the US and no real payback.
A study shows that Now 51 percent of Americans beleive that Iraq was part of 9-11.
Even though the CI FREAKING A is screaming that there is absolutely no proof of such a thing after months of investigating this possibility. *** READ THE ARTICLE I POSTED ABOVE ****
So how are we protecting the US by invading N Korea? They had nothing to do with 9-11? OH I see because they aren't listening to NATO and shutting down Nuclear developement....much like we aren't going to listen to NATO by invading another country.
How are we protecting our Allies when every ally is screaming at us to just STOP.
Your right though....we are protecting our assets.....Iraq's Oil.
I can hear it now:
"We as AmUricans must invade N Korea for not complying with NATO"
"We as AmUricans dont have to listen to NATO when it comes to invading another country."
Last edited by SweetZ28; Feb 12, 2003 at 09:49 PM.
imho he should have never had a large buildup, never brought the allies in... just sent small teams in.
but now that he's done this, i think his biggest mistake is that at first he said screw NATO and the UN, then suddenly he tried to get their support. now its getting way too dragged out, and whenever you talk about going to war, the less likely you are to actually get people to want to do it. bodybags don't do well for our allies leaders, especially when our allies general public don't believe its a threat to them, only to us.
but now that he's done this, i think his biggest mistake is that at first he said screw NATO and the UN, then suddenly he tried to get their support. now its getting way too dragged out, and whenever you talk about going to war, the less likely you are to actually get people to want to do it. bodybags don't do well for our allies leaders, especially when our allies general public don't believe its a threat to them, only to us.
Originally posted by SweetZ28
This is what Bush's goal is.
A study shows that Now 51 percent of Americans beleive that Iraq was part of 9-11.
Even though the CI FREAKING A is screaming that there is absolutely no proof of such a thing after months of investigating this possibility. *** READ THE ARTICLE I POSTED ABOVE ****
So how are we protecting the US by invading N Korea? They had nothing to do with 9-11? OH I see because they aren't listening to NATO and shutting down Nuclear developement....much like we aren't going to listen to NATO by invading another country.
How are we protecting our Allies when every ally is screaming at us to just STOP.
Your right though....we are protecting our assets.....Iraq's Oil.
I can hear it now:
"We as AmUricans must invade N Korea for not complying with NATO"
"We as AmUricans dont have to listen to NATO when it comes to invading another country."
This is what Bush's goal is.
A study shows that Now 51 percent of Americans beleive that Iraq was part of 9-11.
Even though the CI FREAKING A is screaming that there is absolutely no proof of such a thing after months of investigating this possibility. *** READ THE ARTICLE I POSTED ABOVE ****
So how are we protecting the US by invading N Korea? They had nothing to do with 9-11? OH I see because they aren't listening to NATO and shutting down Nuclear developement....much like we aren't going to listen to NATO by invading another country.
How are we protecting our Allies when every ally is screaming at us to just STOP.
Your right though....we are protecting our assets.....Iraq's Oil.
I can hear it now:
"We as AmUricans must invade N Korea for not complying with NATO"
"We as AmUricans dont have to listen to NATO when it comes to invading another country."
Any way North Korea promised in a treaty that they would not build WMDs. They are now going back on that promise. They say its because we didnt help them build nuclear power plants. That may be true. But sabre rattling isnt the answer.
If they launch a ballistic missle our way will you still think we are to blame?
Originally posted by anasazi
imho he should have never had a large buildup, never brought the allies in... just sent small teams in.
but now that he's done this, i think his biggest mistake is that at first he said screw NATO and the UN, then suddenly he tried to get their support. now its getting way too dragged out, and whenever you talk about going to war, the less likely you are to actually get people to want to do it. bodybags don't do well for our allies leaders, especially when our allies general public don't believe its a threat to them, only to us.
imho he should have never had a large buildup, never brought the allies in... just sent small teams in.
but now that he's done this, i think his biggest mistake is that at first he said screw NATO and the UN, then suddenly he tried to get their support. now its getting way too dragged out, and whenever you talk about going to war, the less likely you are to actually get people to want to do it. bodybags don't do well for our allies leaders, especially when our allies general public don't believe its a threat to them, only to us.
The big build up is giving Saddam a chance to see we mean business. Giving him a chance to pony up the WMDs or prove he does not have them. This is his war to avoid. Not ours. Where were you Clinton lovers when Wild Bill bombed Iraq during his impeachment hearings?
Allies? What allies? What has any other country done for us? Ever?
See, thats why having a conversation with such short sighted people never work out well.
You associate Bush with good, and if he says war with Iraq is good then Yeeeeeeeeeee HAAAAAAAAAAAAW lets do it.
And ASSume that I am a Clinton fan, and wouldn't of disagreed with his decision to bomb Iraq at the time.
First to respond to some things you posted though.
1. It is only speculated that N Korea has WMD.
2. Even if they had them, it is widely accepted that their range would be very short. Not capable of hitting american soil.
We stirred N Korea first. It was in a Bush speech that out of the blue he labeled them an AXIS of EVIL. So they pretty much said...."This is our country, we can build what we want, and if we are an Axis of Evil then we might as well start up some nuke plants."
There is no proof that they are building WMD. Other than them turning on some nuclear (energy producing) plants. Guess what. If they didnt have energy sanctions on them, it wouldnt be an issue.
Whats funny to me is that we feel like we must protect the world from the possibility of Nukes being used. But the world is telling us to stop.
And we are the only country thats ever used them. Twice. And almost used them again in the 60's. A cooter hair away. Built up an arsenal and kept building them in the 80's. If anyone has proven to have an ability to use them....its the US. So whos role is it to police us? Let me guess.....noone...but we must do it.
You associate Bush with good, and if he says war with Iraq is good then Yeeeeeeeeeee HAAAAAAAAAAAAW lets do it.
And ASSume that I am a Clinton fan, and wouldn't of disagreed with his decision to bomb Iraq at the time.
First to respond to some things you posted though.
1. It is only speculated that N Korea has WMD.
2. Even if they had them, it is widely accepted that their range would be very short. Not capable of hitting american soil.
We stirred N Korea first. It was in a Bush speech that out of the blue he labeled them an AXIS of EVIL. So they pretty much said...."This is our country, we can build what we want, and if we are an Axis of Evil then we might as well start up some nuke plants."
There is no proof that they are building WMD. Other than them turning on some nuclear (energy producing) plants. Guess what. If they didnt have energy sanctions on them, it wouldnt be an issue.
Whats funny to me is that we feel like we must protect the world from the possibility of Nukes being used. But the world is telling us to stop.
And we are the only country thats ever used them. Twice. And almost used them again in the 60's. A cooter hair away. Built up an arsenal and kept building them in the 80's. If anyone has proven to have an ability to use them....its the US. So whos role is it to police us? Let me guess.....noone...but we must do it.
Are you serious? Kim Dumb Eel say hes got nukes! Says he thinks it can reach America. His words.
They have the worst human rights record and get called Evil so that makes it ok to build nukes?
Oh and our nukes have protected our country for many years my friend. Our having nukes has meant you have the internet and every other freedom. Read American history from 1945 on.
Our use of the Atom bomb was totally reasonable. The Germans were working on one as well and we were lucky to have gotten ours ready first. Or would you rather have had another million Americans killed in war.
They have the worst human rights record and get called Evil so that makes it ok to build nukes?
Oh and our nukes have protected our country for many years my friend. Our having nukes has meant you have the internet and every other freedom. Read American history from 1945 on.
Our use of the Atom bomb was totally reasonable. The Germans were working on one as well and we were lucky to have gotten ours ready first. Or would you rather have had another million Americans killed in war.
My last post:
If I hear the man butcher basic words and sentences anymore then Im going to scream.
I agree! Aguing over the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Originally posted by SweetZ28
See, that's why having a conversation with such short sighted people never works out well.
See, that's why having a conversation with such short sighted people never works out well.
If I hear the man butcher basic words and sentences anymore then Im going to scream.
I agree! Aguing over the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
Originally posted by 2002Z28SSConv
My last post:
If I hear the man butcher basic words and sentences anymore then Im going to scream.
I agree! Aguing over the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. [/B]
My last post:
If I hear the man butcher basic words and sentences anymore then Im going to scream.
I agree! Aguing over the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. [/B]
I agree! ARguing over the internet is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.R
Mispelling the language on the internet is not an idicator of intelligence....just typing skill. Mispronouncing words like American is.
Originally posted by BlackRocketZ
Small teams General? Baghdad is a big city. Saddam never sleeps in the same bed on consecutive nights.
The big build up is giving Saddam a chance to see we mean business. Giving him a chance to pony up the WMDs or prove he does not have them. This is his war to avoid. Not ours. Where were you Clinton lovers when Wild Bill bombed Iraq during his impeachment hearings?
Allies? What allies? What has any other country done for us? Ever?
Small teams General? Baghdad is a big city. Saddam never sleeps in the same bed on consecutive nights.
The big build up is giving Saddam a chance to see we mean business. Giving him a chance to pony up the WMDs or prove he does not have them. This is his war to avoid. Not ours. Where were you Clinton lovers when Wild Bill bombed Iraq during his impeachment hearings?
Allies? What allies? What has any other country done for us? Ever?
there are LOTS of groups inside the country that want saddam gone. we have people trained specifically to help them do such things. what i feel we should have done is let these people do the dirty work, let them get the country on the virge of overthrow, or on the virge of these groups attacking the government, then have a "terrorist" bomb take out saddam... or we come in and bomb the crap out of his communications equipment.
but then again, opinions are like a-holes, everyone's got one

actually this has been very eye opening, decent arguments abound
I disagree we are a global society and that has a new set of rules to play by. Going to war with Iraq is not to defend America that is an excuse Bush is using to cover for a failing economy. I am not blaming him for the economy I feel he sees a way out and a way to gain points. Will I vote for him only if he is the lesser of the evil that runs for the next term….
I tell ya a little revolution is good for the soul sometimes… Show the government who is really in charge.
I tell ya a little revolution is good for the soul sometimes… Show the government who is really in charge.
Originally posted by anasazi
there are LOTS of groups inside the country that want saddam gone. we have people trained specifically to help them do such things. what i feel we should have done is let these people do the dirty work, let them get the country on the virge of overthrow, or on the virge of these groups attacking the government, then have a "terrorist" bomb take out saddam... or we come in and bomb the crap out of his communications equipment.
but then again, opinions are like a-holes, everyone's got one

actually this has been very eye opening, decent arguments abound
there are LOTS of groups inside the country that want saddam gone. we have people trained specifically to help them do such things. what i feel we should have done is let these people do the dirty work, let them get the country on the virge of overthrow, or on the virge of these groups attacking the government, then have a "terrorist" bomb take out saddam... or we come in and bomb the crap out of his communications equipment.
but then again, opinions are like a-holes, everyone's got one

actually this has been very eye opening, decent arguments abound
We tried that before. In Viet Nam. Didnt work. Tried it again after the Gulf War. Didnt work. You cant back a horse that cant run.
You have to do the job yourself.
I love the comment being brought down to their level… Their level has free healthcare, most of Europe. Soon the EU will be able to overpower the US economy…. We are all one now for good or bad and work at it..
We are not Europe. This is the US. Why with all that is "so great" with europe do they come in droves to America?
Ok, free medical. $6.00 a gal. gas.
8 to 20% unemployment.
No constitution. And all that is associated with it like free speech and gun ownership and no search and seizure without just cause.
Guilty until proven innocent.
Queens, parliment, prime ministers, and an economy in the crapper.
They need us way more then we need them. Thats how you get drug down to thier level. Trying to make everybody equal all over the world.
It would be all good for them and all bad for us.
Ok, free medical. $6.00 a gal. gas.
8 to 20% unemployment.
No constitution. And all that is associated with it like free speech and gun ownership and no search and seizure without just cause.
Guilty until proven innocent.
Queens, parliment, prime ministers, and an economy in the crapper.
They need us way more then we need them. Thats how you get drug down to thier level. Trying to make everybody equal all over the world.
It would be all good for them and all bad for us.


