N2O Tech Discussion for the use of Nitrous Oxide

This Is why I will never go Wet Setup....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 10:00 AM
  #16  
Hawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,319
From: Jackson, NJ, USA
Wet is the way to go. Don't judge it by one freak accident.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 11:50 PM
  #17  
JWINN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
From: Grand Rapids, Mi USA
Sorry that this happened to ya! Its very unfortunate for something like this to happen to such a nice car!

Weather it be from installation error or product malfunction. Either way a person must take all of the percautions they can to insure that something like this doesn't happen to his or her car.

This year as my car nears compleation it was recommended to me by my chassis builder to consider installing on board Halon fire suppression system. Consider the cash invested in your car what ever level it may be and for the cost of a fire system there is no comparisson! Look at it like this most insurance companys don't cover engine modifications nor do they reimburse for speed parts added. So for under $350.00 a person could add a fire system that has all the bells and whistles. Small price to pay to protect the thousands you have in it all ready!

Sorry to hear about your misfortune!
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #18  
96speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,248
From: Houston, TX
I hope this is enough...

http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...79_32_full.jpg

http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...79_33_full.jpg

Ryan
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 02:26 PM
  #19  
got_hp?'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by rskrause
I don't think that what's been posted here sheds any light on what happenned that would support the contention to "never go wet setup".

Rich Krause

agreed...........ive seen n/a cars go up in flames...........so i guess we should all "never go internal combustion" and get an electric motor.
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 03:17 PM
  #20  
EricTheBald's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 93
Nope. Seen them burn up too.
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #21  
Hawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,319
From: Jackson, NJ, USA
I'll just ride my bike then. Then i'll juice myself with roids or something, but maybe I'll blow something else up???
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 04:37 PM
  #22  
ElkyRacer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 446
From: Texarkana Tx
If I am not mistaken, both IHRA and NHRA require a fire extinguisher in the car if you have nitrous wether it be hooked up or not. If you have a bottle with any nitrous in the car, you are supposed to have an extinguisher. Im not sure if he had one or not, but I bet if he did, and thought about it, he might have been able to save his car. I hate to see that happen to such a nice looking car.

Kyle
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #23  
SS69MAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 60
From: BURLESON, TEXAS
Re: This Is why I will never go Wet Setup....

Originally posted by bp's95formula
http://drugg.net/bird_roast.htm

This happened at the opening night at a new track in SD. 1/8th mile.

You think insurance will cover that?
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 05:35 PM
  #24  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
yea, I wouldn't blaim that on a wet nitrous kit. NA back fires, and Dry nitrous backfires can cause fires also
Old Jul 2, 2003 | 11:31 PM
  #25  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by JordonMusser
yea, I wouldn't blaim that on a wet nitrous kit. NA back fires, and Dry nitrous backfires can cause fires also
10,000 posts

Rich Krause
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #26  
GhostZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 660
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
That was a dry chem extinguisher that was used but apparently the track crew hasn't been trained at all on procedures during a car fire....it looked as if they just hit the dry chem right on the closed hood.

DruggNet, if you see this, shoot me an email at traveller_25@hotmail.com I'll hit you up with a PM as well.
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 04:01 PM
  #27  
'94 Bad A Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,905
From: Orlando,Fl
Originally posted by bp's95formula
I heard that the fuel line came out of the shark nozzle and sprayed everywhere.

Yeah that was deffinately installed propperly.
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 08:17 PM
  #28  
N2OpwrdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 503
From: Washington, PA
FWIW...I know two people around here that had NOS wet kits, installed by a famous speed shop (Stropes). Kit ran fine for like a bottle, then one day...Bam, major intake backfire that blew the TB and intake, MAF, etc off one and just the intake off the other. Both have since switched to dry kits. That was about a year na d half ago ago. No problems so far. Their two experiences were a major influence on my decision to go dry. Plus, I never intended on running huge shots. Another thing, if you do any research on the net about nitrous(wet kits) and spraying into the intake manifold...Almost all say its not good to be spraying fuel in there due to puddling, It just makes sense.
Old Jul 3, 2003 | 08:51 PM
  #29  
RacinLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,620
From: Dover DE
how can it puddle when it is being sprayed under what is essentially full vacuum? Not knocking anyone,but this is more "urban legend" then fact. Yes fuel is heavy,and some say it will seperate and cause said puddle,but in 10 years i have never seen it. I have had backfires,but they were from solenoid issues more then a wet kit.

I have heard the puddling argument for years,and i have sprayed various types of intake's,and never had a "puddling" issue. If it was that big of an issue,there wouldnt be single nozzle wet efi kits.

As said before,tere isnt enough evidence to link this disaster to the wet kit,if i remember he said it was a freshly (and possib ly over oiled) filter that started the whole fire.
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #30  
N2OpwrdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 503
From: Washington, PA
Whats up racin...seems we are taging along on the same threads. To everyone their own....with that said. I just couldnt resisit to ask. The solonoid the you had problems with on your kit, was it the fuel one? Either way, enough said about this topic. Lets not make it wet vs dry battle that reaches a 100+posts like the LS vs LT1 debates. All kits are good and can be made to run. Run what ever suits your needs. Ill just always stay away from wet kits...until/unless i go direct port or something like that. Then, you cant go wrong with wet. My .02. Later!

Also, racin...see ya in AOL "ricer patrol chat", I mean "Car chat".

Last edited by N2OpwrdTA; Jul 4, 2003 at 11:26 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.