Will anti-sieze ruin your 02 sensors?
Will anti-sieze ruin your 02 sensors?
I used antisieze on a used set of 02's when I installed my headers. I pulled em out after a week and replaced em with the ones that were on my car. They looked nearly brand new, so I just put some regular anti-sieze on em and screwed em in. I have been noticing my gas mileage has greatly dropped, I pulled the 02's out and they are VERY black so I know I am running rich. I can't hear any exhaust leaks, so I know that isnt my problem. I was reading in my Chiltons manual and it said to only use di-electric anti-sieze, that regular anti-sieze can hurt the sensor. Is this true?
I never read that about anti-seize, does it say anything (warning) on the tube of anti-seize about O2's? I used it on mine and have never had a problem. Of course the most obvious thing is your first guess, an exhaust leak.
I have always heard never to use 'antiseize with moly (molybdinum disulfide)' on plugs for this reason. Searching I found a recommendation to use the copper stuff sparingly, and not to get it on the first few threads so it can't creep into the chamber.
I thought the package for the AC/Delco sensors indicated that they had been pre-coated with "conductive" anti-sieze compound. The biggest problem I've seen reported with using anti-sieze is people slopping it on too thick, to the point where it oozes out onto the inner sensor shield. You just need a little dab.
Using a "conductive" compound would be a bigger issue on the 93 single-wire sensors. The 4-wire sensors include ground wires for both the sensing element and the heaters.
Using a "conductive" compound would be a bigger issue on the 93 single-wire sensors. The 4-wire sensors include ground wires for both the sensing element and the heaters.
Yeah mine had antisieze on em when I bought em. Its just weird to me because when I fist did my headers, i gained an average of about 1 mpg, then I changed from 100k miles AC sensors that have seen 2 header installs now, and put my old Bosch ones in, and i dropped an average of 3 mpg just from that. So I re-installed the AC ones again, and my gas mileage went back up, but it is not as good as it was at first. My car is definately running rich still, but I am almost positive I have no exhaust leaks before the 02's.
I used antisieze on a used set of 02's when I installed my headers. I pulled em out after a week and replaced em with the ones that were on my car. They looked nearly brand new, so I just put some regular anti-sieze on em and screwed em in. I have been noticing my gas mileage has greatly dropped, I pulled the 02's out and they are VERY black so I know I am running rich. I can't hear any exhaust leaks, so I know that isnt my problem. I was reading in my Chiltons manual and it said to only use di-electric anti-sieze, that regular anti-sieze can hurt the sensor. Is this true?
I am getting ready to switch my rear O2's to see if I have a sensor problem or a cat converter problem and was wondering the same thing.
I was planning on using dielectric gel since the exhaust tubes can't be any hotter than the cylinder heads, but I wouldn't know if that was the best move.
I was planning on using dielectric gel since the exhaust tubes can't be any hotter than the cylinder heads, but I wouldn't know if that was the best move.
Paulster, I know they all come with anti-sieze. But there is a sertian type my chilton manual said use only dielectric antisieze b/c regular antisieze can hurt your sensor. I just don't know if this is true or not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350350
Fuel and Ignition
14
Aug 11, 2015 12:03 PM
whitehooptie
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
3
Aug 10, 2015 07:02 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 01:26 PM
zajones
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Jul 30, 2015 02:18 PM



