LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Ugh, slow track times, timeslip inside, help PLZ!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 03:48 PM
  #16  
IllusionalTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,542
From: Long Island, NY ; Norfolk, VA
Originally posted by FastZinTennessee
EvilBox, I know what you mean about the 60' times. There were guys there on ET streets running 2.0s as well.

Euclid, I will shoot for 14.0s from now on

Anyone think that I would benefit from 3.73 gears?? That's about as low as I'd like to go.

John
like someone said prior to me.. 3.73 should be the lowest you go.. i know someone who went w/ 4.11 and has since gone back to the 3.70 gear.. As far as 60ft's every .1 off the 60 is somwhere like 1.5-1.75 tenth off your ET.. no specific measurement.. but thats the most important time other than the one at the end... YOu'll get there.. Put a gear in it take out some weight and have fun..
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 04:25 PM
  #17  
Euclid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 623
From: UT @ Austin
Originally posted by SoCalFbody

On a brighter note, us pre-97's still have strong, fairly quick engines that look and sound great which assist in me having a date on the weekends
What's wrong with the 97's?
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 04:46 PM
  #18  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Originally posted by SoCalFbody


you must also remember that the LT1's are rated 275-285 at the FLY while LS1's are under-rated at 305+ at the wheels.
I think you meant LS-1s were under-rated 305+hp at the flywheel, more depending on the year and Z28, SS. Though no differences in the engine itself.
They typically dyno at the rear wheels in 300-320hp range which would indicate the LS-1 are putting out about the same horsepower as a C5.
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #19  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
The LS1s I ran against were pre 2000 autos, leading me to beleive that they would put out about 280-290rwhp(with lid and maybe free mods). Oh well..........
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:23 PM
  #20  
ImportsRsloths's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
From: Amelia, OH
Wink

What cam are you going to be supporting???
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:32 PM
  #21  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
I'm looking at the LT4 HOTcam. Cheap, effective.

John
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 07:18 PM
  #22  
ImportsRsloths's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 146
From: Amelia, OH
thats funny, thats actually the exact kit i have sitting in my room waiting to install........ Dyno numbers on that cam when tuned properly are KILLER, especially with Long tubes......
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 07:38 PM
  #23  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
So I hear!! Where did you order yours from??

John
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 08:27 PM
  #24  
craigffb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 663
From: Clarksville, TN
I'd say your times are right on. The only thing you have that I don't is the stall. Best time in sig.
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 09:24 PM
  #25  
95_RipperZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 783
From: Atlanta, GA
Well my mods are almost right on with yours and I have the times in the sig with a some wheel spin. 40% humidity and 1,000 ft above sea level. Just as a point of reference.
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 09:55 PM
  #26  
ucrazymonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 552
From: San Antonio, Texas
Im sorry, but I dont see where the mods you have done would keep up with an LS1 From what I have read you have no more than maybe 20-30 RWHP added. I think your times were right on for your mods. Maybe in cooler weather you may have seen a 13.4xx, but I think you would need to do more to see 12's.

I would add 1.6 RR's, ditch those 3.23's for some 3.73's, ditch that 2200 Torque converter (its about 300-400 above stock) and get somewhere closer to a 3000 stall. Also you need to get some tuning. When I used my LT1 Edit on the dyno after I have installed some mods, I cam ususually tune it for a good added 10-15 RWHP.

Here is a time slip for you to compare to. This may help you see where you need to be if you want to hit a high 12.9xx.

60 foot- 1.769
330 foot- 5.2562
1/8 ET- 8.2321
1/8 MPH- 82.31
1000 ET- 10.8117
1/4 ET- 12.9892
1/4 MPH- 103.82

Have any questions that I might be able to answer to help you, just ask.
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #27  
ucrazymonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 552
From: San Antonio, Texas
I have seen probably close to 30-40 differsnt LS1's and LT1's on dyno's. Each running 10-20 times, so you could say I have seen alot of dyno sessions.

Most LT1's run anywhere from 230-250 RWHP, while LS1's run 280-320 RWHP. Depending on beind a A4 or M6.

I started at 230 RWHP and 252 RWTQ on a bone stock LT1 with 100,300 miles on it. Now I have 114,500 miles on it while being just a bolt on car but producing 290 RWHP and 347 RWTQ. Not to bad for a bolt-on car. Now if I could just get some cooler weather in San Antonio I think 12.7's wont be a problem. Probably will have to wait until fall to get some cooler air.
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 10:40 PM
  #28  
krispy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 272
From: GPW, MI
with a 104 trap u should be very low 13 if not 12s, so just try again on a different day, cant run the best every single time
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #29  
JKDZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 627
From: Cookeville , TN
dont worry about it , LS1's reel me in too, its normal!

LS1



those are pretty respectable times~!
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #30  
FastZinTennessee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,521
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Well it turns out that I compared the best times of the day, and I did in fact run a faster time than the LS1 did. Just didn't run faster than him on that run. He even got there earlier than I did, and ran in the cooler air in the morning. I suppose that makes me feel a little better. This brings me to another point, my traps were all over the place!! I hot lapped, trapped 102.7, then 103.7, then for the rest of the day it fluctuated between 100.0 and 101.5. I honestly don't see how 10* can make me lose 3.7mph

John



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.