Track times in here 383

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 25, 2009 | 01:43 PM

#16

hghpwr

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 86

From: palm harbor fl

I agree the stock heads are holding you back,but its not bad on the 60ft depending on what tires you have.I can see a 11.50 in your future with a decent set of heads.
race on.

May 25, 2009 | 05:10 PM

#17

supernova1972

Registered User

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 190

From: Indianpolis, IN

Quote:

Originally Posted by bombebomb

Worst run of the night was

60 -2.276
330 - 6.548
1/8 - 9.818MPH - 79.72
1000 - 12.373
1/4 - 14.447
MPH - 109

Runs like that is what I call spin half track then let off and get back in it

Best run
60 - 1.834
330 - 5.151
1/8 - 7.891
MPH - 89.52
1000 - 10.243
1/4 - 12.214
MPH - 114.58

Quickest mph and time
115.00 mph
12.214 ET

How are my times? For a typical stock headed 383 or similar set up.

383
12:1
forged internals
stock unported heads
231/239 550/585~ cam
TD's for exhaust
headers
LCA's
Nitto 555r
Electric w pump
pro mag rockers 1.6
!spare
!jack
!floor mat
!urine
!AC

Good thing you added the driver mod during the night lol. Seems pretty right for stock heads. Id say youd be looking at 11.5-11.9 with decent heads.

May 25, 2009 | 07:25 PM

#18

bombebomb

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,855

From: Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by hghpwr

I agree the stock heads are holding you back,but its not bad on the 60ft depending on what tires you have.I can see a 11.50 in your future with a decent set of heads.
race on.

Nitto 555r's, I tried some different burn out amounts to try and lower it, but to no avail. Anywhere from no burn out, to john force burn out to the stage lights.

I am curious what is "wrong" or why the one person thinks something is wrong. Everyone else seems to think its about right.

May 25, 2009 | 10:54 PM

#19

Z-RATED94

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,557

From: Carol Stream, Il.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bombebomb

If your referring to my comment don't take it personally. I said I wasn't bashing.

Do like most and just ignore me, that's what I would do.LOL With a few more tweaks you should crack the high 11's. The only reason I would expect a little more and said so, is the fact that I have a friend with a stock bottom end, stock heads with a HotCam and all the other goodies that goes 12.30s at 112mph.

May 25, 2009 | 11:01 PM

#20

Injuneer

Administrator

Joined: Nov 1998

Posts: 71,094

From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ

It ran 115 MPH on the STOCK heads. ET means nothing... its the MPH that indicates HP.

May 26, 2009 | 08:38 AM

#21

bombebomb

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,855

From: Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z-RATED94

If your referring to my comment don't take it personally. I said I wasn't bashing.

Hehe, no offense taken I was just curious. The day I get mad at someone on the internet is the day I find something to do outside.

May 26, 2009 | 02:41 PM

#22

Z-RATED94

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,557

From: Carol Stream, Il.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Injuneer

It ran 115 MPH on the STOCK heads. ET means nothing... its the MPH that indicates HP.

I know how it works, but thanks for the reminder.

May 26, 2009 | 05:21 PM

#23

deerslayinrenek

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 496

From: Central, PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Injuneer

its the MPH that indicates HP.

very true.......and my 103.4mph indicates my lack of hp

Is this your first runs on the new engine?......the numbers look good, and when the heads and N20 get on there

May 26, 2009 | 06:11 PM

#24

bombebomb

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,855

From: Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by deerslayinrenek

very true.......and my 103.4mph indicates my lack of hp

Is this your first runs on the new engine?......the numbers look good, and when the heads and N20 get on there

Yeah, first time to the track with the new engine. Once we get heads, and some N2O flowing things should get very interesting. Plus a converter. Hoping the next time I go to the track to get some lower 60's when I lower my tire pressure 10psi or more. I believe they are at 26-28 now.

Last edited by bombebomb; May 26, 2009 at 07:20 PM.

May 26, 2009 | 09:40 PM

#25

Javier97Z28

Moderator

Joined: Dec 1999

Posts: 3,853

From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl

Not bad... people need to forget about the "383" in the sig and just consider it close to a cam only setup.

May 27, 2009 | 10:29 AM

#26

dr97z

Registered User

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 181

From: North Platte, NE

I'd say it's pretty good for stock heads an stock converter. A 3600 stall alone would drop that down to an 11.7 with approx. 1.6 60ft with some sticky tires. With stock heads the motor is going need some RPM's which he's not getting until further down the track. Some good heads and a good converter, this would be a low 11 second car easy. 115 mph sounds pretty good for what he has.

May 27, 2009 | 09:37 PM

#27

reamo04

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 3,705

From: Kansas

bombe, you definately need a 3600 yank converter with that cam. Im surprised your brakes even hold it. 115 is good for stock heads with that cam, and stock converter. Get the heads and a converter, your looking at 11.4s at least. I know what that cam can do, and your not even close to there :-p