Track times in here 383
05-22-2009, 11:31 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Track times in here 383
Worst run of the night was
60 -2.276
330 - 6.548
1/8 - 9.818MPH - 79.72
1000 - 12.373
1/4 - 14.447
MPH - 109
Runs like that is what I call spin half track then let off and get back in it
Best run
60 - 1.834
330 - 5.151
1/8 - 7.891
MPH - 89.52
1000 - 10.243
1/4 - 12.214
MPH - 114.58
Quickest mph and time
115.00 mph
12.214 ET
How are my times? For a typical stock headed 383 or similar set up.
383
12:1
forged internals
stock unported heads
231/239 550/585~ cam
TD's for exhaust
headers
LCA's
Nitto 555r
Electric w pump
pro mag rockers 1.6
!spare
!jack
!floor mat
!urine
!AC
60 -2.276
330 - 6.548
1/8 - 9.818MPH - 79.72
1000 - 12.373
1/4 - 14.447
MPH - 109
Runs like that is what I call spin half track then let off and get back in it
Best run
60 - 1.834
330 - 5.151
1/8 - 7.891
MPH - 89.52
1000 - 10.243
1/4 - 12.214
MPH - 114.58
Quickest mph and time
115.00 mph
12.214 ET
How are my times? For a typical stock headed 383 or similar set up.
383
12:1
forged internals
stock unported heads
231/239 550/585~ cam
TD's for exhaust
headers
LCA's
Nitto 555r
Electric w pump
pro mag rockers 1.6
!spare
!jack
!floor mat
!urine
!AC
Last edited by bombebomb; 05-23-2009 at 12:37 AM.
05-23-2009, 12:36 AM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
I know, heads are in the plans. I also need a 3500 stall, 300 shot of nitrous etc etc.
Last edited by bombebomb; 05-23-2009 at 12:39 AM.
05-23-2009, 08:31 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Petersham, MA
Posts: 1,697
Wow I'll second that. Stock heads are choking that engine big time. Also, I didn't see a tune in that mod list. That could be a significant amount of power lost...
05-23-2009, 08:39 PM
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
05-23-2009, 10:18 PM
#10
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
Not a pro racer but I am looking at it on dragtimes.com and it says for 9:53 (ran at 9:27)
at 9:53 it was 68 degrees, 58% humidity, 30.12 DA (if that sounds all wrong, sorry).
The car was not running 110% but the small kinks that are in it should not effect it "to much".
at 9:53 it was 68 degrees, 58% humidity, 30.12 DA (if that sounds all wrong, sorry).
The car was not running 110% but the small kinks that are in it should not effect it "to much".
05-23-2009, 11:17 PM
#11
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,677
115 MPH on stock unported heads..... doesn't sound too bad to me. Big problem with the ET is the weak 60-ft. Once he gets it launched, it picks up respectable MPH over the 2nd 1/2 of the track. Stock converter may explain the weak 1/8th.
How big is the cam?
30.12"Hg is the barometric pressure, not the density altitude.
How big is the cam?
30.12"Hg is the barometric pressure, not the density altitude.
Last edited by Injuneer; 05-23-2009 at 11:20 PM.
05-23-2009, 11:40 PM
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,856
115 MPH on stock unported heads..... doesn't sound too bad to me. Big problem with the ET is the weak 60-ft. Once he gets it launched, it picks up respectable MPH over the 2nd 1/2 of the track. Stock converter may explain the weak 1/8th.
How big is the cam?
30.12"Hg is the barometric pressure, not the density altitude.
How big is the cam?
30.12"Hg is the barometric pressure, not the density altitude.
Does 1445 sound more like the DA?
Yeah, the 1400~ rpm launches are not to quick.
For those who do not sit in here all day reading every little post like some of us (me lol), the reason for the abnormally large cam on stock heads is because heads are in the plans, I just did not have the cash and was not changing cams twice. Also nitrous is in the cards.
