"Torquest" Cam
Re: "Torquest" Cam
I would recomend the Comp 304. I had that in my 9C1 with a 383 and heads. That car would break'em loose at 45-50mph no problem. This motor is now in my camaro and I spin from tick over through 3rd.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Originally Posted by ss9c1man
I would recomend the Comp 304. I had that in my 9C1 with a 383 and heads. That car would break'em loose at 45-50mph no problem. This motor is now in my camaro and I spin from tick over through 3rd.
I would only recommend that cam boosted or sprayed.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
I had the cc304 in a Camaro. That cam seemed to make a ton of bottom end. When I would go to the track it would break the tires loose no matter what I did. This was with DR's , SFC's,ect.
Last edited by I burn rice too; Jun 12, 2006 at 11:35 AM.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
With the 227 I dyno'd 352/356 and ran a 12.495@115.1 full weight just bogging it off the line. If I had a dyno tune and new springs+ the true duals I have now it would have gone 117-118mph easy.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Oh yeah, if you are going to swap cams for sure, and you want an off the shelf cam, the 210/224 (227) is tha way to go.
truedualws6 has a sweet setup, and the 227 is great for low end TQ with a decent bump up in HP.
Dan
truedualws6 has a sweet setup, and the 227 is great for low end TQ with a decent bump up in HP.
Dan
Re: "Torquest" Cam
With the Crane 227, I've made 350 rwhp with ported heads stock displacement and seen 335 rwhp with stock heads. Looks like it'll make 310 - 360 rwhp depending on supporting mod's.
Frank 95Z has gone as quick as 11.3 at 116 with this cam and stock heads, NA.
Frank 95Z has gone as quick as 11.3 at 116 with this cam and stock heads, NA.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Originally Posted by engineermike
Frank 95Z has gone as quick as 11.3 at 116 with this cam and stock heads, NA.
Dan
Re: "Torquest" Cam
The crane 227, the GM 845 or even the Comp 304 or 501. These cams don't spin as high and make good torque and power lower down. Many of the B-body guys use these successfully. That and some gears with your 2400 stall should work nicely.
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Originally Posted by 1quikZ
nope these trucks are heavy 5000 punds is pretty close, give or take 250 pounds
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Originally Posted by TrevorH454
Even if that truck is a 4WD, it still shouldn't weigh that much. My 90 model 454SS when basically stock weighed in around 4600, and that's with a very heavy big block. 

Re: "Torquest" Cam
I vote for the 227 also. I run stockheads and bolt ons and made 331rwhp thru a Strange 12bolt with a Vig3200 unlocked. I ran 11.40 at 116(not 11.30's) and my car weighs 3327 with me in it. I now run the same setup with a custom Joe O cam and I've run 11.27 118.90 but the 227 had a better 60ft.(low end torque) Frank95z
Re: "Torquest" Cam
Originally Posted by Frank95z
. . . I run stockheads and bolt ons and made 331rwhp thru a Strange 12bolt with a Vig3200 unlocked. . .
Mike
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



