Is there a such thing as a 1995 SS?
One of the problems with this type of post is all the misinformation that appears.
This is wrong. All early SS's were done by SLP not the factory.
This is also incorrect. The year of manufacture is controlled by the VIN not the year of actual production. As an example, my 97 is a late 96 production car. It was built is 96 sent to SLP in 96 and releast from SLP on 8/6/96. But is a legal 97 because it is titled, and VIN'ed by the factory as a 97.
There are two very easy ways of verifing this is NOT an SS. One is the lack of the RPO Code WU8, all SS's have this code. The second is to call SLP with the VIN, and ask them.
This is wrong. All early SS's were done by SLP not the factory.
This is also incorrect. The year of manufacture is controlled by the VIN not the year of actual production. As an example, my 97 is a late 96 production car. It was built is 96 sent to SLP in 96 and releast from SLP on 8/6/96. But is a legal 97 because it is titled, and VIN'ed by the factory as a 97.
There are two very easy ways of verifing this is NOT an SS. One is the lack of the RPO Code WU8, all SS's have this code. The second is to call SLP with the VIN, and ask them.
They were VIN controlled, but a dealer might have ways around that. Again its a fake SS either way.
One of the problems with this type of post is all the misinformation that appears.
This is wrong. All early SS's were done by SLP not the factory.
This is also incorrect. The year of manufacture is controlled by the VIN not the year of actual production. As an example, my 97 is a late 96 production car. It was built is 96 sent to SLP in 96 and releast from SLP on 8/6/96. But is a legal 97 because it is titled, and VIN'ed by the factory as a 97.
There are two very easy ways of verifing this is NOT an SS. One is the lack of the RPO Code WU8, all SS's have this code. The second is to call SLP with the VIN, and ask them.
This is wrong. All early SS's were done by SLP not the factory.
This is also incorrect. The year of manufacture is controlled by the VIN not the year of actual production. As an example, my 97 is a late 96 production car. It was built is 96 sent to SLP in 96 and releast from SLP on 8/6/96. But is a legal 97 because it is titled, and VIN'ed by the factory as a 97.
There are two very easy ways of verifing this is NOT an SS. One is the lack of the RPO Code WU8, all SS's have this code. The second is to call SLP with the VIN, and ask them.
X2!
the only thing people most people what them for is the hoosd, spoiler and wheels anyway...
the only way i would want is if it were untouched (no mods), totaly stock and had low miles... i think that it just ruins an ss to mod it... they are more of a car to hang on to and apprieciate... more valuable that way...
my theory: if you plan on modding it then just get a z...
if your looking to collect then get a true ss...
the only thing people most people what them for is the hoosd, spoiler and wheels anyway...
the only way i would want is if it were untouched (no mods), totaly stock and had low miles... i think that it just ruins an ss to mod it... they are more of a car to hang on to and apprieciate... more valuable that way...
my theory: if you plan on modding it then just get a z...
if your looking to collect then get a true ss...
Re: Is there a such thing as a 1995 SS?
Yes thare is a 1995 ss because they came with the new 3800 series 2 motor u had the 3.4 base then 3.8 ss and the lt1 in the z28 I know this because I took it to the chevy dealer and they verified that it was a 1995 Camaro SS
Re: Is there a such thing as a 1995 SS?
4th Generation (1993 - Present)
Dealer was yanking your crank, or incredibly stupid.
This thread is being closed to implement troll protection.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
dbusch22
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jan 5, 2015 07:14 PM
Hal Fisher
Site Help and Suggestions
4
Sep 14, 2002 09:36 PM



