Test Post - Site Problems?
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 194
From: Nebraska
Re: Test Post
it seems like there has been less posts here in the last few months in general. i wonder if all the LT1 projects are winding down or getting sold to new owners?
orrr there's the tards like me! haha i would be willing to bet injuneer shakes his head everytime he see's that ive posted something
orrr there's the tards like me! haha i would be willing to bet injuneer shakes his head everytime he see's that ive posted something
Last edited by englundjd; Nov 26, 2011 at 05:13 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 245
From: Lebanon, Indiana
Re: Test Post
I've actually been having trouble on the forum lately, all the pages take awhile to load now for me and I'm unsure why. The sections with the ads on the side and top have the loading symbol ( rotating circle ) and nothing loads. It slows down my computer until the ads eventually pop up or an error page occurs. So maybe others are having trouble with related issues.
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
From: Kingsport,TN
Re: Test Post
I've actually been having trouble on the forum lately, all the pages take awhile to load now for me and I'm unsure why. The sections with the ads on the side and top have the loading symbol ( rotating circle ) and nothing loads. It slows down my computer until the ads eventually pop up or an error page occurs. So maybe others are having trouble with related issues.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 583
From: $oCal Goodne$$
Re: Test Post
To think... Injuneer's bin of threads and posts to address was empty as he was all caught up helpin' us noobs! That even possible?
Your just that damn efficient Injuneer! Seems everyone took the weekend off boss, by all means do the same! You deserve it more then anybody.
*tips hat*
-Ruben F.
Your just that damn efficient Injuneer! Seems everyone took the weekend off boss, by all means do the same! You deserve it more then anybody.
*tips hat*
-Ruben F.
Thread Starter
Administrator
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Re: Test Post
I don't know how many people are aware that the ownership of the site changed hands about a month ago, and it was moved to a new server.
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=837323
Since the move, there has been a lot of discussion among the moderators regarding slow reponse, freezes, etc. I'm hoping that these problem are not discouraging people from posting here. I know for me it is very frustrating to post. Several of the moderator features like "move thread" are almost impossible to use (which will probably make some people happy
).
If you are having problems with the site, PLEASE post on the "Site Help and Suggestions" forum. There is already a fairly long thread there that was started on the "F-Body Lounge" and moved to the Site Help forum.
The more we make the new owners aware of the problems, the more likely we will get them solved.
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=837323
Since the move, there has been a lot of discussion among the moderators regarding slow reponse, freezes, etc. I'm hoping that these problem are not discouraging people from posting here. I know for me it is very frustrating to post. Several of the moderator features like "move thread" are almost impossible to use (which will probably make some people happy
).If you are having problems with the site, PLEASE post on the "Site Help and Suggestions" forum. There is already a fairly long thread there that was started on the "F-Body Lounge" and moved to the Site Help forum.
The more we make the new owners aware of the problems, the more likely we will get them solved.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 62
From: League City, Texas
Re: Test Post - Site Problems?
Lots of I-Frames loading seperatly, externally loaded ads, and most importantly, the database and file system is on a slower server now. And I dare to say that IB has some of their other forums running on the same server...
If you put this site, along with ls1tech, thirdgen.org, and other sites on the same box... there is going to be a big hit in performance... I know the guys had this site on a nice box or rack before...
And alas, by doing a nslookup on the 3 examples above, along with rDNS, seems likely that this is the case..
These people's priority is to make money from ads.. performance is not the top of the list.. matter of fact, to maximize revenue, unfortunatly it is bad practice to squeeze as much as you can out of every server you have.
If you put this site, along with ls1tech, thirdgen.org, and other sites on the same box... there is going to be a big hit in performance... I know the guys had this site on a nice box or rack before...
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping camaroz28.com
Pinging camaroz28.com [98.158.195.143] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.143:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 105ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 106ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping thirdgen.org
Pinging thirdgen.org [98.158.195.216] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.216:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 78ms, Average = 76ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping ls1tech.com
Pinging ls1tech.com [98.158.195.126] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.126:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 70ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 71ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping camaroz28.com
Pinging camaroz28.com [98.158.195.143] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.143: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.143:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 105ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 106ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping thirdgen.org
Pinging thirdgen.org [98.158.195.216] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.216: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.216:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 78ms, Average = 76ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>ping ls1tech.com
Pinging ls1tech.com [98.158.195.126] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=246
Reply from 98.158.195.126: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=246
Ping statistics for 98.158.195.126:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 70ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 71ms
C:\Users\Jonathan>
And alas, by doing a nslookup on the 3 examples above, along with rDNS, seems likely that this is the case..
These people's priority is to make money from ads.. performance is not the top of the list.. matter of fact, to maximize revenue, unfortunatly it is bad practice to squeeze as much as you can out of every server you have.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post