LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

stock shortblock max safe RPM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
CoronaL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 295
From: Winnebago, IL
stock shortblock max safe RPM

buying a 92 Corvette project car.
Want to put some heads/came etc... into it, but am a bit out of the fold re: LT-1 info. Most of my experience has been LSx related past few years and have fogotten much of what I learned re: LT series motors.

I seem to recall the stock rod bolts were the weak link in these motors
I want about 375-400rwhp from the Y body.
I also seem to recall a max safe rpm of 6200 rpm's on the stock bottom end which will really limit me in cam choices and probably won't hit my HP goals.

Please advise
I did search but came away just as confused as before
thx
John
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #2  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
I would agree with 6200 rpm being the upper limit on the stock bottom end. The biggest issue IMO is the bearings start to come apart after repeated 6200+ rpm use.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
zx1216's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,213
From: Milwaukee, WI
i don't think there is one set RPM that you must not cross. If you want it to last 100k don't spin it over the stock redline, personally i spin my 197k shortblock to 6800 on a cc 306 but i don't expect it to last forever and am planing on a rebuild sooner than later. BTW, i'll post pics when mine lets go, it should be good, hahaha
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #4  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
My understanding is if a motor has seen 5800 RPM max for tens or even hundreds of thousands of miles then it becomes acclimated to those RPM's and a "sweet spot" is developed.

Once you start revving that engine much higher you are no longer in that "sweet spot". The heat, friction and natural forces plus current wear takes its toll on the bearings and rod bolts etc. Based on this I think its safe to say that a brand new LT1 straight off the showroom floor could be hopped up and it would easily survive much higher RPM's right off the bat.

Raising the RPM's on an existing engine is a roll of the dice but the consensus seems to be 6200 RPM max.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #5  
zx1216's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,213
From: Milwaukee, WI
huh, i guess i have never heard that logic before but it could be true. At any rate if you start caming an existing engine there is always a chance to spin a bearing due to a dirty install.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #6  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by zx1216
huh, i guess i have never heard that logic before but it could be true. At any rate if you start caming an existing engine there is always a chance to spin a bearing due to a dirty install.
This was explained to me by Lloyd Elliot.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #7  
1racerdude's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,661
From: LA (lower Alabama)
Originally Posted by CoronaL
buying a 92 Corvette project car.
Want to put some heads/came etc... into it, but am a bit out of the fold re: LT-1 info. Most of my experience has been LSx related past few years and have fogotten much of what I learned re: LT series motors.

I seem to recall the stock rod bolts were the weak link in these motors
I want about 375-400rwhp from the Y body.
I also seem to recall a max safe rpm of 6200 rpm's on the stock bottom end which will really limit me in cam choices and probably won't hit my HP goals.

Please advise
I did search but came away just as confused as before
thx
John


Rod bolts are a weak link.
Ya will be limited in RPM's to what the computer is programed for. In LT1 Camaro it's 7/7200 and the fuel tables run out.
Ya can get an aftermarket system and the sky is the limit.
Your cam will determine the shift points.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
T/A-Bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 215
From: Sweet home Chicago
I once asked about good cams for stock rev ranges (below 6200), and the two that came up were:

Ligenfelter 74211. 211/219, .530/.560 with 1.6's 112 LSA

Crane 104227 ("227")... 210/224, .511/.553 with 1.6s. 112 LSA

Notice the short duration and very high lift. These may not have the peak HP of many other cams, but the "area under the curve" is quite impressive. I seem to recall guys running easy 12s with the Crane.
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
For me I thought the small Joe O. cam would see a little less RPM. But the set-up dictates a 6400 rpm shift point for the best 1/4 mile times. It really doesn't bother me though, as the stock short block only has 29k on it. Plus if it lets go I'd like to build a econo 383 that can hold up to a 150 shot of nitrous.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
canbaufo
Parts For Sale
7
May 25, 2015 12:01 PM
MyShibbyZ28
Parts For Sale
0
Feb 14, 2015 12:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.