265 rwhp 310 tq., first dyno 2:88 gear 2" duals, 5 yrs. ago.
Same dyno 2 months ago 309 rwhp 336 tq. mods in sig.

 

Car was on the dyno tonight, 1994 Camaro A4, 286 rwhp an 306 rwtq. with BBK shortys, SLP loudmouth and K&N FIPK.

 

I'm just throwing you out "numbers" based on what GM "says." Ive been around way long enough to know that most every manufacturer under rates theri products in the name of "all that is holy."

Until I see actual DYNO sheets from guys that are stock, those numbers are pretty close to real Son.

No shame in them since we all "know" our cars are much faster than the other "275 BHP" cars.

Cheers,
-Ivan

 

I thought this thread wanted "stock f-car lt1 rwhp numbers"

Why do you people keep on posting dynos of your car after it's been modded??

 

Another question is wether you guys giving estimates are referencing it to a Dynojet or a Mustang dyno setup. Makes a big difference

 

Does make a difference ...

 

Your estimates of "parasitic loss" (actually "drivetrain loss") are too high. M6's are under 14%, A4's under 18%, and maybe closer to 16%.

I'm tempted to delete all the "not stock, but here's my numbers"...... just clouds the answer to the original question, which was STOCK.

 

I wish this wasn't necessary. But, I believe it may be. The posts I would consider off-topic.

 

I couldn't agree with you more....that's why I posted up what I knew to be facts...

Not just some random dudes liking to brag about what their "stock" motor ran on brand X Dyno. Sounds more like a bunch of Jotos posting just to hear themselves.

At least I had some statistics that were relevant,
-Ivan