LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Solid roller 383 engine dyno numbers

Old Jan 30, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
Solid roller 383 engine dyno numbers

Well my solid roller 383 was finally wrapped up and dynoed today on the engine dyno. The combo is an EB ported AFR 220's, Accel pro ram intake, 259 267 108 lsa cam .57x lift, T&D rockers with 12.15-1 compression. The car is set up for fuel injection but the shop does not have the ability to use fuel injection on the combo so I borrowed a 750 carb to put on the combo for the dyno and a standard mechanical advance distributor. We only made one pull to 7200 rpms with a very conservative tune and the combo made 520hp@6500rpms and 480 ft/lbs@5000rpms. The egine builder says that the 750 is way undersized and he has no doubt a 1050cfm dominator would net another 60-70hp as he said the power flattened out at 6500rpms. The engine made 472ft lbs at 4000 rpms so it is a torquey engine. The engine builder said there was no use in him dialing it in (more $$) as I am fuel injecting it anyway but I wanted to have it dynoed and valves adjusted etc so that is the only reason I dynoed it this way. The combo was also dynoed without the crankcase vacuum pump which should also net me another ~10-15hp. All in all I am very happy with the numbers and expect somewhere around 600-620 crank horsepower once the engine has the fuel injection, vacuum pump and proper dyno time/ break in. I am shooting for mid to high 10's NA and low 9's on the bottle.

Matt
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #2  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
mine runs mid 10's with a 750 carb and a stock ported head 128 mph

I would hope your is faster.
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #3  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
Me too...but I will have to work against 3.70 gears (for the bottle) and a 3500 raceweight so if goes mid 10's set up for the bottle I will be happy.
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #4  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
Me too...but I will have to work against 3.70 gears (for the bottle) and a 3500 raceweight so if goes mid 10's set up for the bottle I will be happy.
I'm 3500#

the only thing that will probly hurt you is your converter...... I have a o.k. 60' low 1.4's
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 09:17 AM
  #5  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
Very nice, please post up the final dyno #s and track times when it's all sorted out.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
I also forgot the mention that this was dynoed with standard 1 3/4" dyno headers and I am using 1 7/8" hedman race headers with the stahl flange so I should be able to pick up a decent amount with the exhaust as well.

Lloyd Elliot speced the cam and said that the cam is optimized for big tube headers so I am confident in my expectations.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #7  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Nostang 96z
The egine builder says that the 750 is way undersized and he has no doubt a 1050cfm dominator would net another 60-70hp as he said the power flattened out at 6500rpms.
Very nice Matt and would like to see those on my 383...

Question: Where does he get those inflated no's by going to a 1050 CFM? From my analysis, I show that pretty much you can only pick up 4-6% of your HP going from 750 to 1050. In your case, this would be 0.04 X 520 = 21 to about 0.06 X 520 = 31 HP.

I really want to know if I am doing my analysis wrong.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #8  
Nostang 96z's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 458
From: Newark, DE.
Your analysis looks good. The engine builder was refering to dialing it in with the 1050 carb. They only made one pull with the engine with conservative jetting and timing. So with tuning alone it would pick up ~30hp and probably another ~30-40hp with the carb. I should have made that clear in the posts above. The goal was 600+ N/A horsepower with the combo.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 12:27 PM
  #9  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
What was the AFR and the timing at?
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #10  
bigbirdta94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 114
From: MIDDLETOWN,DE
They did not have a wideband on the combo so they just went by EGT's. I am not sure what they were but I thought I remember him saying they were around 132x degrees. The timing was at 36 degrees. (I am posting from a friend's house under his login)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve69SS396
Track Kill Stories
15
Aug 10, 2015 02:45 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
4
Jan 13, 2015 09:19 PM
Wicked
Drag Racing Technique
3
Jul 25, 2002 04:19 PM
Joe Brodman
Drag Racing Technique
5
Jul 24, 2002 05:24 AM
Ed95Pont
Drag Racing Technique
1
Jul 23, 2002 08:26 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.