RWHP vs. flywheel
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
Thanks guys. With both formulas I'm between 480-487FWHP. Nows heres a question, whats up with my TQ? I dynoed 414 RWHP but only 350 RWTQ?? That is a N/A pull, shouldn't it be a little higher or is that common?
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
What CI motor? The TQ is just about right for a 350. I made the same HP as you with my 383 but made 412 Ft Pnd of TQ. The whole reason that I went with bigger cubes was to pick up TQ across the board. I make 350 ftpnds at 1800 RPM and it peaked at 4500 with 412 but held above 300 till 6500 where I quit making HP as well. I realy think there is more in my combo considering I had a miss the day I dynoed and still have stock lifters (New but stock)
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
I was able to measure my engine's performance on an engine dyno with full intake and exhaust, and then in the car on a chassis dyno. At the 500flywheelHP level, the drivetrain losses were only 12.6% for:
-steel flywheel Street Twin
-stock T56
-3" chrome moly DS (19#)
-Strange 12-bolt with 3.73's
-275/40-17's on OZ Monte Carlos.
I have never seen any evidence that the T56 loses 16% or 18-20% with a 12-bolt.
If you believe my numbers, you can either divide by 0.874
414 / 0.874 = 474 flywheel
or you can multiply by 1.1442
414 x 1.1442 = 474 flywheel
-steel flywheel Street Twin
-stock T56
-3" chrome moly DS (19#)
-Strange 12-bolt with 3.73's
-275/40-17's on OZ Monte Carlos.
I have never seen any evidence that the T56 loses 16% or 18-20% with a 12-bolt.
If you believe my numbers, you can either divide by 0.874
414 / 0.874 = 474 flywheel
or you can multiply by 1.1442
414 x 1.1442 = 474 flywheel
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
You divide it by the number, not multiply. Say its 16% loss, you divide your RWHP by .84 to get the FW #'s.
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
Originally Posted by 97bowtie
Multiplication and division are opposites, so you can divide by .84 (1.00 - 0.16) or multiply by 1.16 (1.00 + 0.16). .
414 / 0.84 = 493 flywheel
414 X 1.1905 = 493 flywheel
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
Originally Posted by Injuneer
No they aren't, and no you can't. If you accept that the losses are 16%, you can either divide rwHP by 0.84 [1.00 - 0.16 = 0.84], or you can multiply rwHP by 1.1905 [ = 1 / (1.00 - 0.16) = 1 / 0.84 = 1.1905].
414 / 0.84 = 493 flywheel
414 X 1.1905 = 493 flywheel
414 / 0.84 = 493 flywheel
414 X 1.1905 = 493 flywheel
Re: RWHP vs. flywheel
Wow, people are throwing out some crazy numbers here, and how to calculate fwhp!
Injuneer I believe since he has the data.
PANZ28,
It's pretty simple to figure out your drivetrain loss. You dynoed 253 rwhp. The LT1 is rated at 285 fwhp. (If GM rated them correctly).
253/285 = 0.89
So
1.0-0.89 = 11% drivetrain loss.
Take any rwhp numbers that you have and divide by 0.89 to get the flywheel numbers. So for you, 414/0.89 = 465 fwhp
I've always used 11% drivetrain loss for the M6 to calculate fwhp.
Dan
Injuneer I believe since he has the data.
PANZ28,
It's pretty simple to figure out your drivetrain loss. You dynoed 253 rwhp. The LT1 is rated at 285 fwhp. (If GM rated them correctly).
253/285 = 0.89
So
1.0-0.89 = 11% drivetrain loss.
Take any rwhp numbers that you have and divide by 0.89 to get the flywheel numbers. So for you, 414/0.89 = 465 fwhp
I've always used 11% drivetrain loss for the M6 to calculate fwhp.
Dan


