Results from Jet Hot LTs
Originally posted by TheHeadFL
What is your intention? To point out that this is not a science experiment with closely controlled independent variables? Of course not.
I'm not trying to make any claims about what just my longtubes added, did you read my post? I was clear about what all I added. The results are comprable, being at the same track in similar but not exactly identical conditions... what else can I add? I personally don't have the money to go dyno before and after. I have nothing to prove, but I'm just stating my experiences. Your mileage may vary, all rights reserved, not valid in Hawaii and Alaska, etc etc yada yada disclaimer disclaimer. These are the numbers and thats all I am trying to say. Its not empirical but it never is.
What is your intention? To point out that this is not a science experiment with closely controlled independent variables? Of course not.
I'm not trying to make any claims about what just my longtubes added, did you read my post? I was clear about what all I added. The results are comprable, being at the same track in similar but not exactly identical conditions... what else can I add? I personally don't have the money to go dyno before and after. I have nothing to prove, but I'm just stating my experiences. Your mileage may vary, all rights reserved, not valid in Hawaii and Alaska, etc etc yada yada disclaimer disclaimer. These are the numbers and thats all I am trying to say. Its not empirical but it never is.
"Results from Jet-Hot LTs"
Not "Results from Jet-Hot LTs and some other mods"
I'm sorry, I'm an engineer and I'm **** about this kind of stuff. There have been too many times when I have tried to trouble shoot problems, and when too many variables are involved, like you have, you can't make any solid claims. That's all.
Congrats on your gains.
I just don't want people a few months from now saying "There was this guy gained 5 mph and 7 tenths from long tubes. I saw it a few months ago." Then people start to think that those gains are expected.
If you go by the rule of thumb that .1 seconds in the 1/4 mile = 10 HP, then you gained roughly 70 hp. Being conservative, let's say 50 HP. How much of that do you think is from LT's? Obviously the other mods had a significant impact on the performance. That's all.
I am happy to hear about your performance increase. I really am. I just want the claims to be as accurate as possible so others aren't misled in the future.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Dec 18, 2003 at 10:24 PM.
Sounds awesome, Your gainin a little extra running open headers, and hes sorta right with the extra mods. A good tune on a stock car can pick up to 10hp no problem, and a car with a full exhaust and opened up intake can gain probably up to 20hp just in a tune, plugs and wires that you replaced might have picked you up a few.
If you could gain .7 from headers that would be sweet, and Im kinda jealous considering i ran 13.2 with a cam and other boltons, but at 110mph so i was lacking traction. you definitely have a 12s bolton car on your hands, get hooked and youll be high 12s no problem. congrats.
If you could gain .7 from headers that would be sweet, and Im kinda jealous considering i ran 13.2 with a cam and other boltons, but at 110mph so i was lacking traction. you definitely have a 12s bolton car on your hands, get hooked and youll be high 12s no problem. congrats.
Thanks bud, but there are plenty of people out there that will say "this guy gained 40hp from just an exhaust, not knowing that they had an extremely choked up 396 with very high flowing heads and they expect to get the same gain from their bone stock engine. Just clarifying the fact that it was not only the headers that gave the gain since its not clarified in the original exactly what was done except "other goodies". Not being an ******* or anything, just clarifying for the "extremely optimistic people" out there
I just don't want people a few months from now saying "There was this guy gained 5 mph and 7 tenths from long tubes. I saw it a few months ago." Then people start to think that those gains are expected.
If you go by the rule of thumb that .1 seconds in the 1/4 mile = 10 HP, then you gained roughly 70 hp. All from LT's?
Originally posted by ImportsRsloths
look Captain Obvious...... its cleary stated that had a few other changes than just the LT headers
look Captain Obvious...... its cleary stated that had a few other changes than just the LT headers
Did you read the title?
It's misleading. That's all. Ok. We're beating a dead horse here.
I've said over and over that I'm happy to hear about his gains.
There are a lot of newbies on this site that may take the post the wrong way, assuming that the LT's got such huge gains.
LT's are great, don't get me wrong, I was just hoping the facts would be stated a little more clearly.
Dan
Originally posted by JustaLT1
Well, you may have room to try and argue his gains, but how do you explain mine? The ONLY thing I changed was the headers and y-pipe (only because I had to), and I picked up 6 tenths and 4 mph with NO tune. The weather was nearly identical and the runs were made just a few weeks apart at the same track. Now my results may not be the norm, but they sure aren't the best I've ever seen or heard of.
Well, you may have room to try and argue his gains, but how do you explain mine? The ONLY thing I changed was the headers and y-pipe (only because I had to), and I picked up 6 tenths and 4 mph with NO tune. The weather was nearly identical and the runs were made just a few weeks apart at the same track. Now my results may not be the norm, but they sure aren't the best I've ever seen or heard of.
Those are great gains. Did you dyno it?
I thought it was 1 mph = 10 HP. I maybe, and probably am wrong about this....but that's what I had always heard. I still don't think that is an EXTREMELY accurate way to measure horsepower gains.
I'm all done talking about this. I don't want to keep bickering about this. I don't want to make enemies here.
I'm probably being over analytical.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Dec 19, 2003 at 12:08 AM.
Forgive me, as I was not trying to argue...merely express my experience with the longtubes. I believe it is good for people to challenge claims made by people to a certain extent to keep newbs from getting on here and claiming to get 25 rwhp from a cold air intake, or to claim that there bone stock LT1 Z28 ran 12.5. When I first started learning about my car, I believed that everybody knew more than I did and I took what people, who had no idea what they were talking about, were saying as fact. By others challenging what they claimed, I realized that you can't believe everything you hear...especially when it comes to what modifications really do what. If any of that makes any sense.
As for as the rest of my exhaust...it was all stock before the headers except for a cutout (stock muffler and intermediate pipe), and it has not changed. I didn't have to do anything to my PCM either. I could probably pick up pretty good from a tune as I have stared at an SES light for over a year, but I'm about to do some motor work and have been waiting to get the tune until after I'm done. However, I WISH I was in a position to have been able to dyno my car, because I believe I picked up around 30 rwhp, if not more, by just adding the headers and Y-pipe. But that is purely speculation on my part.
As for as the rest of my exhaust...it was all stock before the headers except for a cutout (stock muffler and intermediate pipe), and it has not changed. I didn't have to do anything to my PCM either. I could probably pick up pretty good from a tune as I have stared at an SES light for over a year, but I'm about to do some motor work and have been waiting to get the tune until after I'm done. However, I WISH I was in a position to have been able to dyno my car, because I believe I picked up around 30 rwhp, if not more, by just adding the headers and Y-pipe. But that is purely speculation on my part.
stereomandan- I didn't mean to call you a "names". Just trying to get the beating of a dead horse done with
Ive seen quite a few guys gain a good .4 off and 4 mph with LT headers... Also, for street cars, general rule is 1 mph = 10 hp otherwise my LCA's and Torque arm netted me 50 HP
Ive seen quite a few guys gain a good .4 off and 4 mph with LT headers... Also, for street cars, general rule is 1 mph = 10 hp otherwise my LCA's and Torque arm netted me 50 HP
Last edited by ImportsRsloths; Dec 19, 2003 at 05:33 AM.
Ok well lets try to put an end to this discussion, I did the LT's 2 weeks ago, I only did LT's and off road Y-pipe.
I ran a best of 14.2 @ 102 before horrible 60' but in any case.
I ran these times consistantly, with of course a consistant crappy 60'
So I ran last friday and ran the times in my sig with equally bad 60' times. Take it for what it's worth but I think the header make a giant difference.
close to .5 tenths, and 3.5 MPH is pretty significant!
I ran a best of 14.2 @ 102 before horrible 60' but in any case.
I ran these times consistantly, with of course a consistant crappy 60'
So I ran last friday and ran the times in my sig with equally bad 60' times. Take it for what it's worth but I think the header make a giant difference.
close to .5 tenths, and 3.5 MPH is pretty significant!
Originally posted by ImportsRsloths
stereomandan- I didn't mean to call you a "names". Just trying to get the beating of a dead horse done with
Ive seen quite a few guys gain a good .4 off and 4 mph with LT headers... Also, for street cars, general rule is 1 mph = 10 hp otherwise my LCA's and Torque arm netted me 50 HP
stereomandan- I didn't mean to call you a "names". Just trying to get the beating of a dead horse done with
Ive seen quite a few guys gain a good .4 off and 4 mph with LT headers... Also, for street cars, general rule is 1 mph = 10 hp otherwise my LCA's and Torque arm netted me 50 HP

Later,
Dan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



