LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

predicted hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2008, 09:35 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cmzfly93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 70
predicted hp

Hello,
I have a 1993 camaro with a 355 motor in it which consist of, 9.3compression Srp -24cc pistons scat procomp 7/16 6.0inch rods stock crank and arp main studs ported heads with 2.00 and 1.56 valves and a cam is comp cam224/236-114 lift is around 550 i think installed at 110 icl and pacesetter long tube headers, flowmaster cat back offroad pipe and ported intake and tbody42 lbs injectors and k&n cold air kit what kinda hp would this make to tires with a t56 and stock rear end heads flow 235ish on a crappy flow bench i think port job looked awsmome
cmzfly93 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:32 AM
  #2  
Fei
Registered User
 
Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 130
could be way off here but those seem like big dishes for NA. I would say it's gonna b kind of a dog with that cam and that SCR.
Fei is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 07:11 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Are you looking to put boost to this??

You realize you dropped compression over a full point from stock?

114LSA was a mistake even if looking to put a supercharger on it, maybe not if looking to turbo.

Going to be weak, think the average cam only car will be a serious challenge for you.
96capricemgr is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 07:42 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
seawolf06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,034
I predict less hp than stock.
seawolf06 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 07:55 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kantuckee Yo'
Posts: 4,405
300-325 RWHP. WTF is up with the 9.3 compression ratio.
wrd1972 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 09:19 AM
  #6  
Kaj
Registered User
 
Kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cody,Wyoming 82414
Posts: 564
I agree with everyone else. I don't understand for the life of me why you went with those pistons and that particular camshaft. *shrugs*
Kaj is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 09:47 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Billy Biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 77
Originally Posted by Kaj
I agree with everyone else. I don't understand for the life of me why you went with those pistons and that particular camshaft. *shrugs*
As I was reading I was waiting for the info on what kinda boost it was going to be getting.....then I realized it wasn't At least it'll sound good at idle
I think he just re-invented the 70's smog motor...although he'd have to drop another full point in compression to actually make it vintage
Billy Biker is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:34 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Mr_Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 289
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=600383
Look's like he has a Procharger. Maybe he should put his mods in his sig.
Mr_Bond is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:02 PM
  #9  
Fei
Registered User
 
Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 130
actually it looks like the charger went TU. And he wants to run a boost motor NA and see what he gets from it.
Fei is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:29 PM
  #10  
Kaj
Registered User
 
Kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cody,Wyoming 82414
Posts: 564
boost motor N/A? lol

Makes no sense and what a waste of time...

Last edited by Kaj; 05-30-2008 at 02:32 PM.
Kaj is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:59 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Wicked1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 261
werd^^^
Wicked1 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 04:22 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Mr_Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by Fei
actually it looks like the charger went TU. And he wants to run a boost motor NA and see what he gets from it.
Oh, I see now. It's not going to be much faster than stock.
Mr_Bond is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 05:41 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cmzfly93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 70
Thumbs down Are you all stupid

first off it had a supercharger all i was asking was for predictions not your input but since you went there it ran over 130 trap with 11psi. Then pieace of crap p1sc went to hell after 3300 miles yeh hah procharger so that day with a 2 bar tune in it and 42 lbs squirters i went from 11.65 131mph to 12.95 at 108 with blower belt cut and air intake removed now i have a 1994 comptuer and tune to match for NA well still working on and i plan on throwing a 200 shot of nitrous on it sorry i don't have unlimited funds to do it right away. Anyway plenty of motors over the years have made "decent" power from a little over 9.1 compression. IF you researched it like i jsut did from a different tech form that wasn't so ignorant you would see that i may have only lost 3to 5 % power could of gained that back from full floateing pistons and roller rockers so for the sake of arguing just pretend it had 10 to 1 compression and predict
cmzfly93 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 05:59 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Jazsun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,834
Why wouldnt you just buy another charger?
Jazsun is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:08 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Originally Posted by Jazsun
Why wouldnt you just buy another charger?
Or just have that one rebuilt?

Did you ever change the oil in it?
mdenz3 is offline  


Quick Reply: predicted hp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.