LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Porting the Stock LT1 Intake Manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
1LESSZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
Porting the Stock LT1 Intake Manifold

Well, I will have the intake off the car shortly and need some things cleared up.

1. Are the ports on the intake manifold smaller than the ports on the head or is it the other way around?

2. If the ports on the intake manifold are smaller than the ports of the stock head, what would port matching them do? Would it improve flow and velocity in the port (leaving stock heads the same)? (NOT GASKET MATCHING!)


-Would the effect of this be the same as opening up the intake runner of the head - lower velocity at lower rpms but better flow up top or would the velocity only improve (result being no lowend loss but a hopeful gain elsewhere)?

I did use search - anyone have pictures of this bulge that is cast into the intake?
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
formulalt4383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 132
If your not porting the heads don't waste your time. If you have a 58MM tb gasket around or plan to put a 58MM tb on then you might want to port that section out but not the runner. a debur might help smooth out the air flow though.
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #3  
1LESSZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
The heads are going to be ported but I was under the impression that there was a gain especially with an aftermarket cam even if there was no headwork. Anyone know the answer to the first two questions?
Old May 11, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #4  
indirocz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 375
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by 1LESSZ28
The heads are going to be ported but I was under the impression that there was a gain especially with an aftermarket cam even if there was no headwork. Anyone know the answer to the first two questions?
My heads arent ported, & with stock fuel system & intake & TB and a cam with retune my car made 351rwhp 398 ft lb tq on motor 424, 501 on 100wet shot
Old May 11, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #5  
1LESSZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
Originally Posted by indirocz28
My heads arent ported, & with stock fuel system & intake & TB and a cam with retune my car made 351rwhp 398 ft lb tq on motor 424, 501 on 100wet shot

So I am assuming that is with a stock ported intake? how the hell did you make that much torque with an lt1 intake? do you have a 383?
Old May 11, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #6  
1LESSZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
Also still looking for an answer to the question below.

-Would the effect of this be the same as opening up the intake runner of the head - lower velocity at lower rpms but better flow up top or would the velocity only improve (result of porting being no lowend loss (or loss of throttle response but a hopeful gain elsewhere)?

and how difficult is it to diy open up the ports on the intake to match ported heads?
Old May 11, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #7  
Quickz1670's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 79
From: San Diego, Ca
The only thing I'd try to do is port the top of the runner, by the injector, to make the entry angle better. Material in that area is thin and you don't want to go though.
Old May 12, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #8  
indirocz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 375
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by 1LESSZ28
So I am assuming that is with a stock ported intake? how the hell did you make that much torque with an lt1 intake? do you have a 383?
Yes, stock LT1 throttle body & intake manifold.- only had the SLP dual pipe CAI & BBK alum. elbow. I dont know how it made that much torque. its only a 355 lt1..
Old May 12, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #9  
97WS6Pilot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,546
From: Florence, Kentucky
Even on my ported heads the Lt1 intake manifold runners are larger than the head runners. I port matched the intake using the gasket as a guide. It required taking alot of material off the area by the injector port on the manifold. It was good for a small gain. This is a pretty easy DIY job.
Old May 12, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #10  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally Posted by indirocz28
Yes, stock LT1 throttle body & intake manifold.- only had the SLP dual pipe CAI & BBK alum. elbow. I dont know how it made that much torque. its only a 355 lt1..
Sounds like you have a spike in your dyno graph. Do you have a scan of it to post?

Dan
Old May 12, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #11  
indirocz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 375
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by stereomandan
Sounds like you have a spike in your dyno graph. Do you have a scan of it to post?

Dan
For some reason I cant get my scanner to scan & post the picture in a usable format. it wants to use Adobe settings to save the picture.

Anyways- on the run i made 398.57 #ft tq the dyno didnt pick up until 3400rpm's & the run i made the 351.92hp on motor the dyno read all the way from 2300. peak HP was made @ 52-5300rpms.

Nitrous runs were peak tq of 501lb ft @2400rpms - there is a spike there from when the dyno picked up for some reason & 424rwhp @ 5,000 RPM
100hp wet shot using compucar 10lb bottle, -4 line, compucar solenoids, & NOS nozzle.
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #12  
1LESSZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 344
what about the divider between the intake runners? Would rounding the innermost or top edge of this divider yield gains? I have read not to "knife edge" it because this could cause turbulence.

Any other somewhat easy diy things one could do? I remember reading something about a hump or bump in the manifold runner?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MadMav
Parts For Sale
8
Feb 6, 2015 11:02 PM
spearous
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Jan 12, 2015 11:03 AM
Elcojoe
Parts For Sale
0
Nov 17, 2014 10:27 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.