LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Panhand Rod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #16  
Aaronh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 71
Originally posted by Jon A
Huge money? My aluminum PHB cost $20. Add good rod ends (like QA1's), spacers and the total comes to around $90. Lighter, stiffer than stock and dead quiet. The handling improvement is very noticable.

http://www.jonaadland.com/Z28/Mods/PHB/AluminumPHB.html
All out is huge money, not your ph rod. Just out of curiousity though, how is an aluminum panhard rod stronger than a boxed steal one? It seems to me that the aluminum would flex more. I don't know, just asking.
Old Mar 12, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #17  
Jon A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 482
From: Mukilteo, WA
Because the vast majority of the deflection is comming from your rubber bushings or from poly bushings if you install some. Making the bar stiffer is doing nothing more than adding weight unless you have solid bearings in each end.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #18  
lons94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 304
From: SW Michigan
Originally posted by Red96Lt1
If you could only get one for now, I would say get some LCA's.


Depends on what you are doing with the car. I don't drag race. And I haven't replaced the LCA's in my car. But for autox, road race, and street driving I gotta think the PHR is better every time.

There are plenty of autox cars that have stock rear control arms. They handle very well. Very well to an autoxer is far better than someone who just drives around. Think of re-gurgitating your insides, around every corner.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 08:09 AM
  #19  
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,667
From: SLC, UT
The stocker is just a stamped steel piece, fairly weak in comparison to every other aftermarket option.

Boxing the stocker with metal plate adds some strength, but not much...

Upgrading to a tubular unit is the strongest option... whether it be DOM, Chromoly, or 6061-T6. All 3 options are very viable options and are very strong.

Infact the weak point of all 3 are the endlings, bushings, or combo of the 2.

The 6061-T6 Aluminum ones are not as strong as the steel ones, basic materials knowledge, but they weigh a LOT less in comparison, and are harder and cost more to Fabricate. That's why you don't see a LOT of them.

The other reason is because a LOT of people don't do much engineering when they design parts like that for cars, they just basically wing it and overkill everything by a TON.

If you actually do the math of how much stress is put on your suspension over the lifetime of the vehicle assuming you're driving it on a racetrack for 100K miles, the aluminum ones won't even be 1/2 way through their life cycle.

Although the rod ends will need to be repaced atleast 2-4 times, they normally don't last more than 20K miles, infact that's the MOST I've heard of getting outta them.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 08:46 AM
  #20  
riceinmybowl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
From: university of tenn at martin
question. what is the other u shaped bar called? the on that runs diagonal?from drivers side fraim down to pass. side axle? thx
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #21  
Aaronh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 71
Originally posted by riceinmybowl
question. what is the other u shaped bar called? the on that runs diagonal?from drivers side fraim down to pass. side axle? thx
Thats the part we've been talking about, it's the panhard rod.

Aaron
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #22  
lons94z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 304
From: SW Michigan
Originally posted by 97FormulaWS-6



If you actually do the math of how much stress is put on your suspension over the lifetime of the vehicle assuming you're driving it on a racetrack for 100K miles, the aluminum ones won't even be 1/2 way through their life cycle.


Just to clarify I'm not trying to be argumentative. I would just simply like to see this "math".

OK first of all I don't see how one could do ANY math in figuring the load transferred through the PHR and PHR mounts. For one there are just WAY to many variables. Car weight, weight balance, ride height, HP, torque arm, control arm angle, tire size and compound. Virtually no two cars will be the same. Even in major factor components, like tire size, and compound.

Also I do know that there has been aluminum PHR failures (not our cars, a SN95 Mustang) and possibly flexing issues with aluminum versions for F-bodies.

Depending on material, tire size, and a mutitude of other setup parts, I can see an aluminum PHR failing.

But for the most part, given an "in the ball park" material selection, you should be fine. FWIW I use an aluminum PHR that I made myself. 3,400lbs, 315 Hoosiers, T2R diff, no problems yet.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #23  
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,667
From: SLC, UT
I actually don't have the numbers to do the math, and infact you are correct, there are TONS of variables in the calculations.

I'll almost be willing to bet that those failures would be attributed to the aluminum not being thick enough, or some other issue with the construction of the PHR.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #24  
riceinmybowl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
From: university of tenn at martin
ok if the diagonal one is the pan hard bar, then what is the horizontal black bar in his pic? thx
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #25  
Jon A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 482
From: Mukilteo, WA
Originally posted by 97FormulaWS-6
The 6061-T6 Aluminum ones are not as strong as the steel ones, basic materials knowledge, but they weigh a LOT less in comparison, and are harder and cost more to Fabricate.
As you said, the ones I used are stronger than the rod ends (depending upon brand of rod end) so why add more weight? However, I will disagree with the "cost more" comment. $12 each for an LCA is pretty damn cheap.
The other reason is because a LOT of people don't do much engineering when they design parts like that for cars, they just basically wing it and overkill everything by a TON.
I fully agree with that. Most of the popular (here, anyway) suspension pieces for these cars don't have much Engineering into them. Most companies that make the stuff don't even have a single Engineer on staff and it shows. That's why I do it myself.

riceinmybowl, the horizontal bar is the PHB. The diagonal one is a brace to provide a redundant loadpath to the body side bracket.
Old Mar 13, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #26  
riceinmybowl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
From: university of tenn at martin
ahhh thank you i was worried my sig was wrong
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Sep 19, 2015 11:19 PM
karpetcm
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Sep 15, 2015 11:07 AM
95craz28
Fuel and Ignition
11
Sep 12, 2015 07:47 AM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.