new track numbers, good??
after installing the hot cam kit and 3.73 gears, i took the car to the track yesterday, this is my best run:
R/T .291
60' 2.267
330 6.186
1/8 9.374
MPH 76.69
1000 12.151
1/4 14.485
MPH 97.30
the weather was:
Temp F. 78
Barometer 23.41
that was at Bandimere Speedway in Colorado
thanx in advance..
R/T .291
60' 2.267
330 6.186
1/8 9.374
MPH 76.69
1000 12.151
1/4 14.485
MPH 97.30
the weather was:
Temp F. 78
Barometer 23.41
that was at Bandimere Speedway in Colorado
thanx in advance..
Do you have any stock numbers to compare to? Colorado is up there, but I would expect the car to run anywhere from 108 - 112 with a hotcam kit, and to take away at least 11 mph is alot for air. I would haphazardly guess the car should be running 14.0s at 100 at least. If you know the DA there, I think you can do a correction for what it would be at sea level. That might help to compare as well.
Looked up elevation for Bandimere. 5830 ft. Corrected to sea level using http://www.rfedd.bigstep.com/generic.html?pid=97 this as a corrector, it is equivalent to a 13.4 @ 104.8. I would expect a bit more from a heads/cam car, but the correction isn't necessarily 100% accurate.
Looked up elevation for Bandimere. 5830 ft. Corrected to sea level using http://www.rfedd.bigstep.com/generic.html?pid=97 this as a corrector, it is equivalent to a 13.4 @ 104.8. I would expect a bit more from a heads/cam car, but the correction isn't necessarily 100% accurate.
Last edited by brain; Aug 7, 2003 at 08:46 PM.
Thats a lil optomistic.... I get 109.27 mph with ported heads/xe224 cam and longtubes.
Originally posted by brain
Do you have any stock numbers to compare to? Colorado is up there, but I would expect the car to run anywhere from 108 - 112 with a hotcam kit, and to take away at least 11 mph is alot for air. I would haphazardly guess the car should be running 14.0s at 100 at least. If you know the DA there, I think you can do a correction for what it would be at sea level. That might help to compare as well.
Do you have any stock numbers to compare to? Colorado is up there, but I would expect the car to run anywhere from 108 - 112 with a hotcam kit, and to take away at least 11 mph is alot for air. I would haphazardly guess the car should be running 14.0s at 100 at least. If you know the DA there, I think you can do a correction for what it would be at sea level. That might help to compare as well.
i ran 15.0 the last time with almost the same condition.. that was before the hotcam kit and 3.73..
but the problem is that this is with the tunning.. not major tunning, but just simple one, there is lot of white smoke.. and when the car is on drive it idels at 600.. and when u crusing at 1800 rpm u can feel the car kind of hesitating..
what do u think wrong...
but the problem is that this is with the tunning.. not major tunning, but just simple one, there is lot of white smoke.. and when the car is on drive it idels at 600.. and when u crusing at 1800 rpm u can feel the car kind of hesitating..
what do u think wrong...
Last edited by tealdevil; Aug 7, 2003 at 09:10 PM.
All right, maybe I was a bit premature to think it was not that bad.
Bandimere is still thin air but have you had any tuning done besides the HPP?
See if you can get someone familiar with your area to tune it for you. Maybe a dyno tune in your area so it will be tuned in the air you will be running in.
Maybe see if you can get a scanner on it and see what the comp is doing.
Bandimere is still thin air but have you had any tuning done besides the HPP?
See if you can get someone familiar with your area to tune it for you. Maybe a dyno tune in your area so it will be tuned in the air you will be running in.
Maybe see if you can get a scanner on it and see what the comp is doing.
Originally posted by Rodrigues
Thats a lil optomistic.... I get 109.27 mph with ported heads/xe224 cam and longtubes.
Thats a lil optomistic.... I get 109.27 mph with ported heads/xe224 cam and longtubes.
Last edited by Kreinmc; Aug 7, 2003 at 10:21 PM.
Originally posted by Kreinmc
Perfect example of what i have seen from just about all of the XE cammed cars. The XE cams seem to just blow in these cars. That is ridiculously slow for heads/cam unless you are also in Denver.
Perfect example of what i have seen from just about all of the XE cammed cars. The XE cams seem to just blow in these cars. That is ridiculously slow for heads/cam unless you are also in Denver.
Originally posted by turbo_Z
i hope you are kidding. the XE224/230 isnt that much larger than the hotcam AND he has home ported heads. 109 mph is really good if you ask me, especially with heads that probably dont flow more than unworked LT4 castings.
i hope you are kidding. the XE224/230 isnt that much larger than the hotcam AND he has home ported heads. 109 mph is really good if you ask me, especially with heads that probably dont flow more than unworked LT4 castings.
Last edited by 97bowtie; Aug 8, 2003 at 03:29 AM.


