New Times on 224/230 XE
Originally posted by ZZtop
Rich and Untamed, I noticed yall are from VA and Illinois. I was wondering if either or you have passed emissions with that cam? Also, i know that a higher lsa reduces emissions, but how does it effect performance?
Rich and Untamed, I noticed yall are from VA and Illinois. I was wondering if either or you have passed emissions with that cam? Also, i know that a higher lsa reduces emissions, but how does it effect performance?
Originally posted by ShelbyZ28
Do you have stock heads with this setup? I want to do this cam but I want to keep my heads stock for now. What are you guys opinions on this. I know guys have CC306s with stock heads so this cam should work to right? Thanks
Bryan
Do you have stock heads with this setup? I want to do this cam but I want to keep my heads stock for now. What are you guys opinions on this. I know guys have CC306s with stock heads so this cam should work to right? Thanks
Bryan
Based on what I've seen in other people's cars over the years (I've had this cam for 3 years), I'd go CC EE 218/230/114 in a stock headed car and CC EE 224/236/112 in a ported head car (assuming you're not worried about emissions or low speed drivability).
Originally posted by RichJ
I have ported heads. I'm sure the car will run fine with a 224/230 and stock heads, but I don't think you'll gain much if anything over a 218/230 except worse drivability and a choppier idle.
Based on what I've seen in other people's cars over the years (I've had this cam for 3 years), I'd go CC EE 218/230/114 in a stock headed car and CC EE 224/236/112 in a ported head car (assuming you're not worried about emissions or low speed drivability).
I have ported heads. I'm sure the car will run fine with a 224/230 and stock heads, but I don't think you'll gain much if anything over a 218/230 except worse drivability and a choppier idle.
Based on what I've seen in other people's cars over the years (I've had this cam for 3 years), I'd go CC EE 218/230/114 in a stock headed car and CC EE 224/236/112 in a ported head car (assuming you're not worried about emissions or low speed drivability).
Bryan
hahaah
Maybe my car is a freak
I am goin to dyno it in few weeks....we shall see what that thing makes
Marcin
ps. my secret is...4.11s and CC306...grab the ***** and let that pummpy sing to 7k
jk....i shift around 6500ish
I guess i am always in the awsome power band of CC306..my car screems up top.
Maybe my car is a freak
I am goin to dyno it in few weeks....we shall see what that thing makes
Marcin
ps. my secret is...4.11s and CC306...grab the ***** and let that pummpy sing to 7k
jk....i shift around 6500ishI guess i am always in the awsome power band of CC306..my car screems up top.
Last edited by xxsaint69x; Apr 17, 2003 at 07:24 PM.
Man, I was happy to hear that with my MPH I could run mid 12s with a 1.8ish 60ft compared to the 13.2 with a 2.3. But now Im a little dissapointed that you ran that good with a 2.3 60ft, maybe if I could hold on to the gears longer (6500 rev limiter) I could pull into the 12s right now.
Thanks man I think the key is that my car has no options and its a formula. I have no airbags, no ac, no sparetire, aluminum driveshaft, no air or egr, no power anything. Plus I only weigh 130 so its pretty light.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Feb 1, 2015 08:26 AM



