New Times on 224/230 XE
New Times on 224/230 XE
Stock last year the best I could get was a 13.995 @ 103
Now I have mods in sig. The heads I ported myself and I ran a 12.7@111.66 with a 2.3 60'. My question is What would my time be around with a 1.8 60' or so. That was on a street tire and some cold weather
Now I have mods in sig. The heads I ported myself and I ran a 12.7@111.66 with a 2.3 60'. My question is What would my time be around with a 1.8 60' or so. That was on a street tire and some cold weather
You could get a 1.8 sixty with some drag radials. I don't prefer 4.10s, as they're too thin for hard launches. You wouldn't gain much with them, as they're for narrow powerband engine, and you've got that nnnnnice 224/230 XE, which is a killer cam, with a very fat torque curve!
With my calculations, if you could cut an 1.8 sixty, your ET would be around 11.95
Hell....12.7 with a 2.3 60' is killer, MAN!!
Get that 60' down!
With my calculations, if you could cut an 1.8 sixty, your ET would be around 11.95

Hell....12.7 with a 2.3 60' is killer, MAN!!
Get that 60' down!
Here's some good data points for you. My 95 Z28 M6 with the same cam (but on a 114 LSA) went 12.9@109 with 3.42s. I installed 4.10s and dynotuned it (gained 15 rwhp) and it went 12.7@113 w/1.87 60-foot. Now that I've got ET Streets and some more practice driving I'm running 12.2s@113 w/1.7 60-foots. I don't powershift or launch higher than 4500 rpm and am not a very fast shifter. You should see 11s with gears/suspension and practice.
RichJ
RichJ
RichJ, Untamedls1, those are some pretty good times for those mods!
I don't go to the track and wanted good overall street performance on a daily driver. So I recently selected and installed (last week) the milder EX 218/224/112 cam. I've been very pleased, but when I see your times I feel a bit jealous.
I guess one can't have it all.
I don't go to the track and wanted good overall street performance on a daily driver. So I recently selected and installed (last week) the milder EX 218/224/112 cam. I've been very pleased, but when I see your times I feel a bit jealous.
I guess one can't have it all.
Rich and Untamed, I noticed yall are from VA and Illinois. I was wondering if either or you have passed emissions with that cam? Also, i know that a higher lsa reduces emissions, but how does it effect performance?
Originally posted by RichJ
Here's some good data points for you. My 95 Z28 M6 with the same cam (but on a 114 LSA) went 12.9@109 with 3.42s. I installed 4.10s and dynotuned it (gained 15 rwhp) and it went 12.7@113 w/1.87 60-foot. Now that I've got ET Streets and some more practice driving I'm running 12.2s@113 w/1.7 60-foots. I don't powershift or launch higher than 4500 rpm and am not a very fast shifter. You should see 11s with gears/suspension and practice.
RichJ
Here's some good data points for you. My 95 Z28 M6 with the same cam (but on a 114 LSA) went 12.9@109 with 3.42s. I installed 4.10s and dynotuned it (gained 15 rwhp) and it went 12.7@113 w/1.87 60-foot. Now that I've got ET Streets and some more practice driving I'm running 12.2s@113 w/1.7 60-foots. I don't powershift or launch higher than 4500 rpm and am not a very fast shifter. You should see 11s with gears/suspension and practice.
RichJ
Bryan
I am exempt from emissions because my car is a rebuilt title, otherwise its just the OBD2 scan test here now so as Long as I dont set an emissions related code which I could turn off with LT1 edit anyway I will pass emissions. Well with my rev limiter set at 6500 rpms I can come across the line in 3rd gear but I try not to because I dont wanna hurt the bottom end so I just upshift it. With 4.10s I think I would come across at the top of 4th.Hmm I cant decide what I wanna do gear wise. I can shift fast and can consistantly pull .50... Rts so I am curious what Ill run in a good situation. I appreciate all the posts guys thank you very much.


