LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

New dyno numbers. Does this torque curve look normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #16  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by dr97z
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2567183/7

scroll to bottom for graph
Has a similar torque profile. Why are the lines so jagged?
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #17  
dr97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 181
From: North Platte, NE
Still trying to figure that out, but you get the just of it. Thought the opti was acting up, replaced it, didn't get a chance to see if it fixed it before the fuel pump quit too. Replacing pump now. This torque curve was completely different than my last motor. It is a lot broader with these heads, cam, and LPP headers, whereas my last motor was very similiar, but with an XE cam, stock ported heads, and Pacesetter headers, it spiked quickly and fell off quickly.
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 11:10 AM
  #18  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Here is a run in speed density mode WITHOUT the elbow & CAI. The torque curve filled in better (except for the funky spike) which made the HP look better too.

Name:  sd-1.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  114.3 KB
Maybe I need a 58mm TB?
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #19  
METALBEAST's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 261
Congrats on the numbers! But I thought you made 412 RWHP a few months back on that setup.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 09:26 AM
  #20  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by METALBEAST
Congrats on the numbers! But I thought you made 412 RWHP a few months back on that setup.
Did on a Superflow dyno corrected to STD. Got the sheet to prove it.

Name:  final.jpg
Views: 59
Size:  39.3 KB

That dyno is local and I only use it for measuring and has a rep for reading high as I have recently learned. The other funny thing is that dyno reads lower torque than the one I tune on.

The dyno that is used to tune is a DynoJet and is a hundred miles away. New SAE numbers are in my sig. I trust this dyno and the tuner far more than the local Superflow.

Clearly that Superflow dyno must be "happy" high because 383RWHP SAE on the DynoJet is far more realistic for my setup. The SAE numbers on the DynoJet were 393RWHP 371RWTQ BTW.

Another case of two dynos being worlds apart.
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 10:52 AM
  #21  
METALBEAST's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by wrd1972
Did on a Superflow dyno corrected to STD. Got the sheet to prove it.



That dyno is local and I only use it for measuring and has a rep for reading high as I have recently learned. The other funny thing is that dyno reads lower torque than the one I tune on.

The dyno that is used to tune is a DynoJet and is a hundred miles away. New SAE numbers are in my sig. I trust this dyno and the tuner far more than the local Superflow.

Clearly that Superflow dyno must be "happy" high because 383RWHP SAE on the DynoJet is far more realistic for my setup. The SAE numbers on the DynoJet were 393RWHP 371RWTQ BTW.

Another case of two dynos being worlds apart.
Oh I was not knocking it by any means. I was just curious. Those new numbers do make sense with the 9 inch in the rear

BTW, ordered my new AC Delco Opti this weekend. Hopefully I had the same problem you did with yours when you first go it back together & I will be up & running in my LE2 Z soon!
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #22  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by METALBEAST
Oh I was not knocking it by any means. I was just curious. Those new numbers do make sense with the 9 inch in the rear

BTW, ordered my new AC Delco Opti this weekend. Hopefully I had the same problem you did with yours when you first go it back together & I will be up & running in my LE2 Z soon!
No knock taken.
I explained the same thing over on tech when I was asked the same thing. Many have told me that if I still had the 10 bolt the numbers would be about 13 points higher. That said its where it ought to be with a small cam but once I fix this intake restriction I should be able to squeeze a bit more out of it.

Your new (un-tampered with) opti should fix your problem.
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #23  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Valve float.


Originally Posted by black96z28
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #24  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by marshall93z
Valve float.
Yeah he got it fixed though. We both, at the time, had the exact same cam. We both ended up installing Patriot golds and the float was gone.
Old Mar 25, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #25  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Oh! Funny... a buddy of mine just had valve float with Patriot Golds and swapped to PAC 1518s and solved it! They did have a few miles on them, though.
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #26  
wrd1972's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
Originally Posted by marshall93z
Oh! Funny... a buddy of mine just had valve float with Patriot Golds and swapped to PAC 1518s and solved it! They did have a few miles on them, though.
The Patriots your buddy had must have been plum wore out because they are a good bit stronger than the 1518's on the seat pressure. I am running ~35# more on the seat with the Pat's compared to the 1218's which are essentially the same as the 1518's but not quite as durable.
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #27  
marshall93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,639
From: Mooresville, NC
Just a couple thousand miles.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve69SS396
Track Kill Stories
15
Aug 10, 2015 02:45 PM
TitoPR221
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
May 26, 2015 12:20 AM
BLK1997Z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
13
May 7, 2015 03:01 PM
Russ95Z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Apr 23, 2015 01:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.