LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

need a guesstimate on MPG with CC306

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
scoobysnax83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,481
From: Arlington, VA
need a guesstimate on MPG with CC306

I'm about to switch over to the CC306, I need a guesstimate on what the MPG will/should be with and without a tune from MAD Z28... About to take a 1600 mile trip in April and need to know how much money to allot for gas...

I will be running the below config...

-CC306 Cam (what's the Combination Motorsports Part Number for it?)

-1.6RR (Give me suggestions )

-L.E. Ported and Polished Heads (2.02" Intake 1.6" Exhaust)

-Hopefully some 30#ers (won't be revving so it won't matter except for tune)

-Jet-Hot MAC Midlengths (No CAT) through SLP 2OTL

-NO EMISSIONS except EGR (I might block it off)

-No A/C system

And I don't run anything less than 93 octane maybe 91 due to the redneck Carolina's

BTW: if you all have any suggestions on revisions, post'm up. I am on quite a bit of a budget. I'm trying to keep this cam swap to under a grand...

Guys, I know its a guesstimate, this post isn't meant to start fights... If it gets out of hand, I'll delete it....
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 02:12 AM
  #2  
97Camaro007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 414
From: Lufkin, TX
I would guessitmate.....around 260 per tank.....depending on the gears...with 4.10's i got around 210 a tank.....
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 02:16 AM
  #3  
scoobysnax83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,481
From: Arlington, VA
good point, I have the stock 3.42's

Common for 6 speeds

thanks BTW

Edit: Hey just to let you know the link in your sig is dead
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #4  
97Camaro007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 414
From: Lufkin, TX
like i said earlier...i'm sure 260 is about right? I mean if you keep your foot out of it...

Michael
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 02:23 AM
  #5  
scoobysnax83's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,481
From: Arlington, VA
o, I never floor my car












Old Feb 12, 2004 | 02:25 AM
  #6  
97Camaro007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 414
From: Lufkin, TX
ME NEITHER!
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #7  
llafro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 408
From: West Coast
With ported heads and a 230/236-112, I get about 24-25 on the highway. That was with stock 3.43 gears driving in fifth gear at a steady 65-70 and turing 2500 RPM. Once I get the 4.10s installed, I would guess the MPG will go up some, since I will be able to use sixth gear. I got 340 miles out of a tank over Thanksgiving.

Around town, it's hard to keep your foot out of it, so those numbers aren't great.

I know it's not a 306, but it's close.

BRAD
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,728
From: Little Rock, AR
So Dave, you are putting in a CC306 for gas mileage purposes?
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #9  
94m5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 228
From: North Colorado Springs
Originally posted by llafro
With ported heads and a 230/236-112, I get about 24-25 on the highway. That was with stock 3.43 gears driving in fifth gear at a steady 65-70 and turing 2500 RPM. Once I get the 4.10s installed, I would guess the MPG will go up some, since I will be able to use sixth gear. I got 340 miles out of a tank over Thanksgiving.

Around town, it's hard to keep your foot out of it, so those numbers aren't great.

I know it's not a 306, but it's close.

BRAD

Why can't you use 6th right now? Your engine does'nt have enough low end grunt to pull 6th that low? I'm just wondering.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #10  
Kain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 708
From: St. Louis, MO
I got about 12-14 mpg with stock heads, but mine's and auto.

Now with heads, looks to be about the same. But I haven't gone through a full tank of gas yet to find out.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:43 PM
  #11  
llafro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 408
From: West Coast
Why can't you use 6th right now? Your engine does'nt have enough low end grunt to pull 6th that low? I'm just wondering.
I can use sixth gear, and do at times. It's just that in sixth, that Geo Metro next to you on the freeway seems to have nitrous or something.

With stock 3.43, the car is undergeared. At the 6400 RPM redline in second, I'm already at almost 75. Then I have the other four gears to use...

BRAD
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #12  
94m5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 228
From: North Colorado Springs
AHHH, Ok, I'm pickin up what your laying down Not running in 6th drives me crazy. I let a friend drive my car, and he won't use 6th just because he does'nt have "enough power" All it takes is a stab of the clutch and a simple arm movement. Lazy fawker.

These are my observations of my friend driving, not you. You have different circumstances i'm sure.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #13  
JPSartre12's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 264
From: Detroit Subs
Originally posted by llafro
With ported heads and a 230/236-112, I get about 24-25 on the highway. That was with stock 3.43 gears driving in fifth gear at a steady 65-70 and turing 2500 RPM. Once I get the 4.10s installed, I would guess the MPG will go up some, since I will be able to use sixth gear. I got 340 miles out of a tank over Thanksgiving.

Around town, it's hard to keep your foot out of it, so those numbers aren't great.

I know it's not a 306, but it's close.

BRAD
You're expecting to get better gas mileage by going from a 3.43 to a 4.10? I'm predicting a decrease in gas mileage if you go that route. The 4.10 is draggier.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #14  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
I have a CC305 in mine. With 4.10 gears, 26" tall tires, an auto trans, ported heads, and 30# injectors I got 18 MPG when I still had my lock-up 3200 stall converter. The car was running 12.3 at that time.

Frank
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #15  
FastWhiteTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 537
From: Was TX, now in Portland, OR
....Whatever happened to the 5 line sigs?

Anyway, I get 14 mpg driving the smaller CC305 around town w/ 3.42 gears w/ M6. But thats not going easy , that's driving how I want to drive. I could probably squeak 16 mpg driving like a granny. On the highway, I'm not sure, I would estimate around 21 mpg. But this is a smaller cam than yours, so it will be worse in your car.

And to those who cruise at 65-70 in 5th gear.....why cruise at 65 mph in 5th gear? If you're cruising, you're not accelerating, if you need to accelerate, Downshift, but that's my opinion on it. If Im' cruising, I'll go into 6th gear at 55-60. I love the 6th gear!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.