Miles Per Gallon = SUCK :(
Miles Per Gallon = SUCK :(
Help me figure out whats going on here please....
I realize the 3.42's screwed me a bit, but this is insane.....10 tank fulls in a row 14-15MPG AVG, with 90% highway...WTF? Its a STOCK car, tried changing to tr55's from bosch plats, no change....
New fuel filter, plugs(tr55's), wires, opti, AC Delco front o2 sensors, CLEAN MAF, and always on 91.....you name it.....? What should I check next?
I realize the 3.42's screwed me a bit, but this is insane.....10 tank fulls in a row 14-15MPG AVG, with 90% highway...WTF? Its a STOCK car, tried changing to tr55's from bosch plats, no change....
New fuel filter, plugs(tr55's), wires, opti, AC Delco front o2 sensors, CLEAN MAF, and always on 91.....you name it.....? What should I check next?
I just got my car and i used to get 14-15 mpg then one day i didnt put my foot into it as much as i used to and i got alot better gas mileage. But trust me it is work a few less mpg to actually "drive" your car!
only if u dont put many miles on ur lt1, when u gotta pay 2.36 a gallon for 93 octane down in south florida!!!!! i love my 2.73's and im always easy on throttle tryin to conserve fuel.
cory
p.s. most recent mpg calculation had me overall at about 21.7 Miles to the gallon. A little higher just on highway, but the 21.7 is overall, and that aint to bad.
cory
p.s. most recent mpg calculation had me overall at about 21.7 Miles to the gallon. A little higher just on highway, but the 21.7 is overall, and that aint to bad.
Originally posted by CamaroZBoy
just gut the cat....flow will be better and improve that gas mileage
just gut the cat....flow will be better and improve that gas mileage
Does anyone know how ****ty an lt1 sounds like with stock cat back and no cats?
Also...
Originally posted by JBirdSS
I agree with the clogged CAT suggestion. I had one clog up real bad and got 15 MPG. Changed the CAT and went to 26.2 on the freeway at 70 MPH.
I agree with the clogged CAT suggestion. I had one clog up real bad and got 15 MPG. Changed the CAT and went to 26.2 on the freeway at 70 MPH.
Last edited by Blue96z28; Jun 18, 2004 at 07:53 AM.
My car threw a code...P0420 Catalyst system efficiency below threshold bank 1. Car actually ran pretty good but after the cat change I felt that the WOT response was much better, idle a bit smoother and the car actually sounded better. The code was the deciding factor for the needed cat change. I have the Actron OBD II autoscanner from Autozone. IT has saved me several time in diagnosing problems and being acurate in the pinpointing of the problem. Get one if you plan on keeping your car.
Does sound interesting on the CAT deal, i think i might just go ahead and get that ypipe. But i'd hate to get the ypipe and find out thats its the EGR, is there anyway to check the function of that? Like if i reach my had back there and manual push in that thing it moves reasonably free...how could i check it?
Does anyone know what these cars sound like with no cats and stock cat-back.?
Does anyone know what these cars sound like with no cats and stock cat-back.?
Originally posted by JBirdSS
My car threw a code...P0420 Catalyst system efficiency below threshold bank 1.
My car threw a code...P0420 Catalyst system efficiency below threshold bank 1.
How many miles were on your car?
Originally posted by ping0317
I had the same issue but disappeared when I got a new high flow cat converter.
I had the same issue but disappeared when I got a new high flow cat converter.
I had 88,000 miles on my car and i was only getting 190 miles on a full tank. After installing high flow cat and getting my car pcm tuned, I jumped up to 230 on a full tank. I think the high flow made a big difference. It was probably clogged.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Magenta_Hearts
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
6
Mar 22, 2015 03:36 PM
jasonduaine
LS1 Based Engine Tech
3
Mar 7, 2015 09:44 AM



