LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

lt1 issues, help appreciated!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #1  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
lt1 issues, help appreciated!

well I finally have some down time due to getting my wisdom teeth out today, so I figure I can research on what my car is doing.

first of all, upon startup it seems like the car is staying in open loop for a very long time. When I start it up there is an intense "sucking" noise from the moroso intake that seems to last a very long time. The rpm's stay up high at about 1000(a4 in park) for quite a while. they never really seem to come back down for a good few minutes.

Also, I'm pretty sure the car is running rich. It pours black smoke pretty bad but only at WOT. Its fine at ever other throttle position. If I'm not mistaken the car runs at open loop at WOT so I believe thats the root of the problem.

If anybody knows what sensors would cause this, let me know. The car just doesn't feel like it used to!

Thanks
-Ryan
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 02:53 PM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
One possible scenario for the black smoke at WOT....

While the PCM does not usde the feedback from the O2 sensors at WOT, it MAY use what it learned in closed loop. If the engine was running lean, for example, and the PCM was using the long term fuel corrections to add fuel and prevent the lean condition, it would continue to use those "add fuel" corrections when it goes WOT. But your case appears to be the opposite - its running rich on closed loop, and the long terms corrections are cutting fuel to bring it back where it belongs. But when you go WOT, the PCM will not use the "cut fuel" long term corrections. It will default to "0" correction.

That means that while its possible for the long term corrections to control the rich condition in closed loop, it can't prevent them at WOT, and you get black smoke.

Hard starts and a long time to closed loop may be a function of the coolant temp sensor.

Is it possible the sucking noise from the intake on cold start is the AIR pump running?
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #3  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
What could be the cause of the fuel condition, bad 02 sensors maybe or do you think its something in the fuel system.

Is the coolant temp sensor you are referring to the one in the WP?

Ill check out the sucking noise, it hasn't always done it, Im 99% sure its the intake but I'll take a closer look and get back to you.

Thanks a lot by the way, your a big help man!
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
The coolant temp sensor in the water pump housing is the one that the PCM uses. It needs that temperature for cold start enrichment, cold start idle speed, PE mode A/F ratio, to decide when to go into closed loop, when to turn the fans on and off, etc.

If you have a "true" rich condtion, could be from too high fuel pressure, faulty MAF calibration, erratic MAP readings, erratic TPS readings, an EGR valve that is malfunctioning. Then there are "false leans" that cause rich operating conditions, because they force the long term fuel corrections to add fuel the engine doesn't really need. Exhaust leaks before the O2 sensors, misfires, and faulty O2 sensors or wires could cause a false lean condition.
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
Pulled the relay for the air pump and fired her up, still made the noise. You can definitely tell its coming from the intake. I'm going to pull the filter assembly out for the heck of it..but I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the open loop problem because it doesn't do it in closed loop.

Where is the other coolant temp sensor, in the block/head i'm guessing? Is there a way I can check this without just buying a new one? I hate just throwing parts at problems.

once again thanks a lot for the help!
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #6  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
here's another piece of info, I followed shoebox's guide for checking the coolant temp sensor on the head, the readings came out good.

When testing the sensor itself, I got a reading of 1980 ohms which seems pretty good. I tested it on a cold motor with an ambient temperature of around 85 degrees.

I also tested the harness for it and got a solid 12v reading so that can't be the problem.

Last but not least I grounded out the harness and the temp gauge maxed out so everything seems to be working properly. Now I'm not sure if these readings are fool-proof but I figure the more info the better.

Do you think this could still be a problem? I'm going to look into your other options..hopefully I can figure out how to test everything haha.

Of course...I'm also due for inspection this month do you think any of this will cause it to fail emissions? I have yet to talk to my shop to see what they say about it.
Old Oct 20, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Why are you checking the coolant temp sensor in the head? Is your gauge not working? As I've already explained, its the one in the water pump housing that the PCM uses, and might be causing your problems. Did you not understand what I posted?

As far as the noise in the intake at cold start, it might be related to the throttle body IAC passages.
Old Oct 22, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #8  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
not sure how I read that wrong..wow haha

I went back and checked the WP sensor and everything seems good there anyway.

Something that slipped my mind is my MAF. The previous owner of the car de-screened it and really hacked it all up trying to port it I guess. Do you think it's reading incorrectly because of it? Here's some pictures:




Last but not least, I took a video of the infamous sucking noise.
http://s16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...t=MVI_2348.flv
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #9  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
any thoughts on this?
Old Oct 27, 2007 | 06:33 AM
  #10  
Guest47904's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by squints88
I went back and checked the WP sensor and everything seems good there anyway.
What do you mean checked it? Did you scan the PCM to see what temp it's reporting? Just looking at it won't mean a thing.

A modified MAF with no other changes will pass an amount of air that the PCM can't see. In other words, at the same frequency as before it was modified, there is now a different volumn of air flow. So the PCM thinks it's getting the same amount of air but it is getting a different amount. In your case it's getting more air than it thinks it's getting. Capeesh?
Old Oct 27, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #11  
applecorn37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 17
From: Houston
As far as the sucking noise goes, my brother has a 93 z28 that does the same thing. He has one of those throttle body air foil things that i think has something to do with it. It runs great, just makes that sucking noise really loud.
Old Oct 27, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #12  
squints88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 159
From: 610 PA
No, I didn't just look at the sensor. I tested the resistance across it with a multimeter and compared it to the graph on shoebox's site. I also check the wiring harness to it which read correctly as well.

Capeesh...But I'm still confused. If the MAF is passing more air than it is reading, wouldn't that cause me to run lean?
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #13  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
You are correct... if the MAF reports less air than the engine is acutally using, the PCM will not add enough fuel (lean), so it will have to rely on the long term fuel corrections to add the required fuel. If the MAF was reporting more than actual air flow, it would run rich, and the long term fuel corrections would pull the excess fuel out. The problem comes when the MAF error exceeds the limits of the PCM to control the A/F ratio using the long term fuel corrections. It can only add 25% or subtract 15% of the fuel using the long terms. In closed loop, it will then use the short terms to adjust the fuel further, but that is unstable. In open loop, on cold start, it can only use the long terms, so it may run poorly on cold start when the MAF error is excessive.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Britbilly
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jan 7, 2015 08:49 PM
ro2207
LT1 Based Engine Tech
14
Dec 4, 2014 06:18 PM
Victory Racing
Drag Racing Technique
21
Sep 1, 2002 06:05 PM
Camaro90RS
Drag Racing Technique
2
Jul 23, 2002 07:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.