LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LT1 haters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #31  
Venomous360's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 404
From: Northwest Corner Ohio, Wauseon
Originally Posted by BlackBird97
Thanks for posting that up, I was just looking for it! I ended up spending around 500 or 600 on it in totall.

-Bought the box from Bob
-Bought used coils from Hawks Thirdgen
-Bought Taylor cut to fit wires
-Bought LS1 style re-location brackets from Thunder Racing
-Bought wire guides, that allow the spark plug wires to run up and next to the heads from Thunder racing.
-Also a few things in between like some wire looming, spare nuts and bolts here and there. If this thread is still going a few weeks from now, when I take out of storage I'll post some pics.
When you say Relocation Brackets, i want to know what you mean. Are your coils mounted on your Valve covers?? You see I have this DAM air box for my ram air Factory Hood that makes it hard to get four coils on the driver side.

Ive only had a LT1 for about a month now and I wouldnt go back to Carbed.

But an LS1 in my LT1 looking car....................now that I would go for. LOL
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #32  
BlackBird97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 451
From: Chicago IL
Originally Posted by Venomous360
When you say Relocation Brackets, i want to know what you mean. Are your coils mounted on your Valve covers?? You see I have this DAM air box for my ram air Factory Hood that makes it hard to get four coils on the driver side.

Ive only had a LT1 for about a month now and I wouldnt go back to Carbed.

But an LS1 in my LT1 looking car....................now that I would go for. LOL
http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...vid=3&pcid=273 <--- you can buys those separately and mount them under the cowl. It looks really good and cleans up under the hood well.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:01 PM
  #33  
tornLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 60
From: TX
I'm proud of my LT1. The car around it doesn't hurt either
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #34  
1FstFormulaV8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 447
From: Portsmouth, Ohio
My town is absolutely full of Mustangs. I'm sure this isn't the only place where it happens. There are a few 4th Gens around here too. Fortunately the LT1 cars outnumber the LS1 cars! There are a few around here starting to show their face..few H/C LT1 cars. I love it. It makes me proud to own one.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:27 PM
  #35  
'94 Bad A Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,905
From: Orlando,Fl
Originally Posted by coco95z28



After all these years of watching youtube videos I actually signed up to youtube because of some of the comments on this video, lol. Like that retard that said "compare a stock LT1 to a GT500KR" the cars are in two completely different classes. One is a "Super Car" and the other is just a little grocery getter.
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:40 PM
  #36  
DAFAIC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
From: Waxahachie, TX
Only hating I have seen on the LT1 is on the boards. Here in town everybody appreciates the car. They love the way it sounds. Gotta a buddy with an 11sec ls1 yest still likes the sound of the LT1 better. Another guy I know working on his 800rwhp/1000rwhp on juice combo'd 02 TA and he loves the way the car sounds. Guys here know the car. They know who I have raced. And though I lost to a 01 Z28 with full exhaust, cai, and 150 shot by 3 car links from 60-120 it doesn't matter it's still respected.

Ran a new at the time 06 vette from 65-130 and lost by 1 link mostly my driving. I had the car for about three days and didn't downshift till he was already going had I already been in third it prolly would have been a tie. That was before 4.10's, msd opti/coil, and tune.


Lt1 led the way for the ls1 plain and simple. It was GM's transition from a timing based ignition system to a pcm controlled ignition system. Without the tests and failures and long term reliability issues of the opti they may have continued utilizing it but it defintily led the way for the coil/plug set up we have today. The opti spark was a huge step for GM in 92 when it was integrated into the vette!

I don't know why I typed all that you guys know this! At this point I'm gonna post it......
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #37  
Scotts94z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 128
From: Houston Tx
People can say whatever they wish about the LT1. In my own opinion it is damn near bullitt proof. Mine has 265,000 miles on it and I can still go outside and fire it right up. It is tired and needs to be rebuilt, but it stilll runs and has never left me stranded in the 14 years that Ive owned it. I really cant wait to get started on freshening it up, it will be alot of work but fun work for the most part.
Old Mar 22, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #38  
Bowtie4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 282
From: St. Cloud, FL
Originally Posted by z28camaro1090
me too man.. 4.6 motor is a piece of **** .. atleast until 05 they got allittle better.. but people down talk the lt1.. ford still hasnt produced a reg gt that will beat it..
possibly the most ignorant post I've seen, in the top ten for sure. The aluminum 4.6 blocks can handle 2500 horse, stock block. There's a guy pushing 2200 horse on one, of corse it's turboed, and the only thing that've had to replace is head gaskets now and then. It is truely amazing what that little motor can do when it gets air shoved down it's throat. And the 4 valve heads flow outragous numbers. Stock form, execpt for the 03-04 cobra's, the motors do suck hind tit, but the potential of it, for being so small, is unbelievable
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:43 AM
  #39  
LT1PERFORMANCE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 121
From: sacramento
4.****s are so gay..i walk all over them and my camaro is bone stock..stupid buttstangs...... and i walk on 5.0s like nothing..unless they got alot of bolt ons..lol
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #40  
94TEALz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by LT1PERFORMANCE
4.****s are so gay..i walk all over them and my camaro is bone stock..stupid buttstangs...... and i walk on 5.0s like nothing..unless they got alot of bolt ons..lol
Congrats on pulling on auto sn95 5.0's,you must have had the flux capacitor on high when you "walked" on him to pull a 15 second car. If your having trouble with bolt-on 5.0's you might want to replace that sweet front mount dist. Ignorant much?
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 12:48 PM
  #41  
PWR SHFT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 421
From: South Riding, VA
This whole thread is getting a bit silly. True, the LT1 is antiquated technology. But it still makes good power as it is based on a very tried and true design that has been refined over 40+ years. Stock for Stock or bolt-on for bolt-on, the blue oval boys have not had a leg up on the f-body since the early 90's when it was TPI vs 5.0. The f-body has always been the stronger. And like I said earlier, although it is impressive that they can get 280 hp at the wheels with a little 281, they are no faster or more powerful than our antiquated 10 - 15 year old cars. It is not our fault they chose to use smaller engines for the mustang. And when you start going down the "money is no object" path as stated by someone above, who cares. 99.99999% of us will never go down that path so the argument is moot. The LSx based engines are superior to our SBC based motors and yes they are still pushrod motors. Again, so what? When it comes to putting power to the street, LS1 or LT1, the Ford crowd has always been playing catch-up.

Last edited by PWR SHFT; Mar 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #42  
Bowtie4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 282
From: St. Cloud, FL
Originally Posted by PWR SHFT
This whole thread is getting a bit silly. True, the LT1 is antiquated technology. But it still makes good power as it is based on a very tried and true design that has been refined over 40+ years. Stock for Stock or bolt-on for bolt-on, the blue oval boys have not had a leg up on the f-body since the early 90's when it was TPI vs 5.0. The f-body has always been the stronger. And like I said earlier, although it is impressive that they can get 280 hp at the wheels with a little 281, they are no faster or more powerful than our antiquated 10 - 15 year old cars. It is not our fault they chose to use smaller engines for the mustang. And when you start going down the "money is no object" path as stated by someone above, who cares. 99.99999% of us will never go down that path so the argument is moot. The LSx based engines are superior to our SBC based motors and yes they are still pushrod motors. Again, so what? When it comes to putting power to the street, LS1 or LT1, the Ford crowd has always been playing catch-up.
I don't think that there is a single thing in this post that anyone can argue about, there is nothing but truth in it. I kinda like being the under-rated motor, it makes the look on someone's face all more priceless when they get beat by it when you say, "yup, it's an LT1". On a side note, I really do agree with whoever said it before that this should be in the lounge.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #43  
PWR SHFT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 421
From: South Riding, VA
I second the lounge.
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 01:57 PM
  #44  
LT1PERFORMANCE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 121
From: sacramento
Originally Posted by 94tealz
congrats on pulling on auto sn95 5.0's,you must have had the flux capacitor on high when you "walked" on him to pull a 15 second car. If your having trouble with bolt-on 5.0's you might want to replace that sweet front mount dist. Ignorant much?
people said they were losing to "the 15 second car" i was wonder how they were losing cuz i leave them easy...and the 5.0s fox bodys that i race have full bolt ons...

Btw u would get raped out here on these streets in your car...dont say nothing unless u know what your talking about...
Old Mar 23, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #45  
Bowtie4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 282
From: St. Cloud, FL
Originally Posted by LT1PERFORMANCE
people said they were losing to "the 15 second car" i was wonder how they were losing cuz i leave them easy...and the 5.0s fox bodys that i race have full bolt ons...

Btw u would get raped out here on these streets in your car...dont say nothing unless u know what your talking about...
let me give you a little bit of free advice here, seeing as you're a noob and all, if you want to **** talk like a high schooler, then I suggest that you take it somewhere else, because that will get you no where, and certain people will remember this and possibly not help you out when you need it. Now my car is not fast by anymeans, but beating sn95's and bolt-on 5.0's isn't much to brag about. Also please quit showing your ignorance by saying someone would get raped on yo streetz when they have as much money in thier engine as you bought your car for. Please don't post untill you have grown up some, thank you.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.