lets see the #'s LE vs. AI
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,195
From: Springfield, IL
lets see the #'s LE vs. AI
represent your head porter in this thread
list, mods, drag strip times/mph, Dyno numbers and anything applicable!....
I would like to keep this on topic as much as possible so it can turn out to be a good reference!!
thank you
Steve
list, mods, drag strip times/mph, Dyno numbers and anything applicable!....
I would like to keep this on topic as much as possible so it can turn out to be a good reference!!
thank you
Steve
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Advanced Induction "Econport" Heads. Phil does not have "stages" but if he did, this would be a stage 1
LIFT INT EXH
.100 - 66
.200 140 101
.300 196 136
.400 232 175
.500 254 188
.550 255 192
.600 255 194
405rwhp, 365rwtq with GM847 cam and nearly every bolton on the stock bottom end with 72000miles.
12.19 @ 116.64mph. Highest mph ever was 117.72mph. The car can run 11s but until I get rid of my stock 10-bolt I have to go easy on the launch. Details are in my sig.
LIFT INT EXH
.100 - 66
.200 140 101
.300 196 136
.400 232 175
.500 254 188
.550 255 192
.600 255 194
405rwhp, 365rwtq with GM847 cam and nearly every bolton on the stock bottom end with 72000miles.
12.19 @ 116.64mph. Highest mph ever was 117.72mph. The car can run 11s but until I get rid of my stock 10-bolt I have to go easy on the launch. Details are in my sig.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 586
From: Oklahoma City, OK
I think the (excellent) quality of both porters has been well documented on this site, so I really don't see the point of this thread. There are just too many other variables to consider. I don't have my AI flowsheet w/ me at work, but they peaked at 292/200 at .600. Dyno #s are in the sign.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 152
From: CC, TX
Originally posted by LT4POWR
I think the (excellent) quality of both porters has been well documented on this site, so I really don't see the point of this thread. There are just too many other variables to consider. I don't have my AI flowsheet w/ me at work, but they peaked at 292/200 at .600. Dyno #s are in the sign.
I think the (excellent) quality of both porters has been well documented on this site, so I really don't see the point of this thread. There are just too many other variables to consider. I don't have my AI flowsheet w/ me at work, but they peaked at 292/200 at .600. Dyno #s are in the sign.
those could not of been lt1 heads?
Advanced Tech Moderator
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Originally posted by LT4POWR
I think the (excellent) quality of both porters has been well documented on this site, so I really don't see the point of this thread. There are just too many other variables to consider. I don't have my AI flowsheet w/ me at work, but they peaked at 292/200 at .600. Dyno #s are in the sign.
I think the (excellent) quality of both porters has been well documented on this site, so I really don't see the point of this thread. There are just too many other variables to consider. I don't have my AI flowsheet w/ me at work, but they peaked at 292/200 at .600. Dyno #s are in the sign.
Last edited by kmook; Dec 17, 2003 at 04:34 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: sarasota, fl
Originally posted by kmook
What are you low/mid #s and other mods? Just curious as you have AI heads also and 40cfm more on the intake at peak than Grease yet made less power
What are you low/mid #s and other mods? Just curious as you have AI heads also and 40cfm more on the intake at peak than Grease yet made less power
different cams, different tuning, different mods.
not really a comparison.
has anyone dyno'd over 400rw SAE with lloyds?
Advanced Tech Moderator
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Originally posted by FacelessZ
but fully porting LT4 heads is pretty pointless unless you have bigger displacement...
but fully porting LT4 heads is pretty pointless unless you have bigger displacement...
Advanced Tech Moderator
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,262
From: Nashville
Originally posted by got_hp?
different cams, different tuning, different mods.
not really a comparison.
different cams, different tuning, different mods.
not really a comparison.
Mods nor cams are listed, that is why i asked as i am curious to their setups. Sorry for asking
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,626
From: Baylor University - TX
Originally posted by kmook
I disagree with this unless you are refering to heads that have been ported to an overly excessive size intake runner.
I disagree with this unless you are refering to heads that have been ported to an overly excessive size intake runner.
Registered User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 291
From: Easley, SC, USA
Phils heads and cam.
412 and 358, 11.41 @ 119.5, big huge miss 500 RPM before cam peaks. Will be right around 425-430 to the wheels when right. Also will be very very close to running 10's on motor, the 11.41 was the first time it went down the track.
412 and 358, 11.41 @ 119.5, big huge miss 500 RPM before cam peaks. Will be right around 425-430 to the wheels when right. Also will be very very close to running 10's on motor, the 11.41 was the first time it went down the track.
