LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #16  
hsyr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,025
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

I'm like 90% sure that is the LE3 cam not the LE2.
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #17  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

There is a new verison of the LE2 cam, the 234/242 is the old verison. hsyr is right it's closer to a LE3 now.

Anyways on to the 227/233 cam.....

Even though the duration specs of the cam are not in a bad range the lobes are old news and are not the most modern cam lobe designs. They are the 344X series of lobes, (3441S 227 @ .050, 3442S 233 @ .050, and 3443S 239 @ .050) they are old lobe designs that don't have the spin tron testing and modern cam design that the new lobes give you. They are rather aggressive lobes that don't offer very good valve control and too me are more of a gimmic for selling cams than they are for giving you HP and TQ. Just because they use a different duration doesn't mean they are "new and special" actually that's not really the case, they are old and out dated.

Your better off telling Lloyd what you want and asking what cam will work the best with your combination. A LE1 cam might work better for you than a LE2 or LE3. The cams can be mixed around with the head stages, they just progressively get bigger with a higher number. They are paired up with the head stages because they are more aggressive and match the valvetrain packages on the heads very well.

Bret
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #18  
dmoor88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,754
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

the 234/242 is the LE2 cam. i e-mailed Lloyd last night and he responded today, saying it's the LE2 cam. the LE3 has a little more duration...
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #19  
dmoor88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,754
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

That and the lift on the LE2 is supposed to be ~.600" lift. There are many people running the 847 and the 306 with nice results on stock castings. Since LE heads are in the near to distant future, I'm leaning more towards running the LE2 cam on stock heads and seeing what sort of numbers I can put up.

Thanks for the above info! Anyone else?
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #20  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

Originally Posted by dmoor88
the 234/242 is the LE2 cam. i e-mailed Lloyd last night and he responded today, saying it's the LE2 cam. the LE3 has a little more duration...
Yeah it was the first version of the LE2 cam and it has about .560" lift rather than .600". The new LE2 cam is different than that cam.

Bret
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #21  
dmoor88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,754
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

you're right. I read his e-mail wrong.

"Doug,

I used to have 234/242 duration on the LE2 cam.

I have the specs on my cams to make a lil more TQ and still have the same HP and RPM capabilities. I ran some cams on some computer program engine simulators and they looked like they would work better and I have been using them for about 4 months now with GREAT results.

The LE1 is pretty small and is made for mild set ups. It is about 225/232 duration.

The LE2 now has about .600 lift and a lil less duration that that.

The LE2 is a lil more duration than that.

I keep the exact specs quiet until the cams are purchased.

lloyd"
Old Dec 14, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #22  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

Sounds about right to me.
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #23  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
There is a new verison of the LE2 cam, the 234/242 is the old verison. hsyr is right it's closer to a LE3 now.

Anyways on to the 227/233 cam.....

Even though the duration specs of the cam are not in a bad range the lobes are old news and are not the most modern cam lobe designs. They are the 344X series of lobes, (3441S 227 @ .050, 3442S 233 @ .050, and 3443S 239 @ .050) they are old lobe designs that don't have the spin tron testing and modern cam design that the new lobes give you.
I cant find that lobe on Comps site. Is it not the same lobes as the XE series? That is what I always assumed but now that I take a look I dont see them anywhere?
Old Dec 15, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #24  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: LE2 cam -vs- 227/233

Originally Posted by turbo_Z
I cant find that lobe on Comps site. Is it not the same lobes as the XE series? That is what I always assumed but now that I take a look I dont see them anywhere?
Yeah I know. Comp doesn't advertise them anymore since they are a old out of date profile. The newest profiles are the ones in the lobe catalog. I don't think they even have the new lobe catalog on the net.

Bret
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tnorm077
Parts For Sale
3
May 23, 2015 09:10 PM
mikey4play
LT1 Based Engine Tech
22
Mar 15, 2015 11:45 AM
Bignasty85
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
12
Mar 3, 2015 04:05 PM
kaoticcamaross
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Feb 17, 2015 03:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.