LE package cost
yea thats what i was thinking. basically im trying to figure out what i can afford here. Ive been planning a CC503 swap with stock heads for a while, but im debating if i shouldnt do heads while im at it. I might pick up an extra job this summer to have some more fun 
my other concern is putting too much stress on my motor. Ill have close to 100k miles by the time i do it, however its extremely well maintained and definitely runs strong.

my other concern is putting too much stress on my motor. Ill have close to 100k miles by the time i do it, however its extremely well maintained and definitely runs strong.
im also considering doing a LE1 heads and a 503 on a 110 grind.
another option is a hotcam i can get for free(Temporary)... but im not liking that idea.
Last edited by JoeliusZ28; Feb 16, 2007 at 03:14 PM.
That really doesn't make sense. Why would you get an LE2 cam when you aren't going to rev it into the power band to make the power gained by the bigger cam. You'd probably have a faster car if you'd go with the LE1 cam than you would an LE2 and not rev it. So you'll gain less mpg, more cam surge, and have a slower car for what? Lope? I mentioned the bigger heads and smaller cam because if you did decide to grow its easier to go bigger on cam than it is swapping heads in my opinion.
LE2 heads = 1400
LE1 heads = 850
difference = $550
Considering im on a college budget, i simply cannot justify spening more than a grand on heads at this point in my life, they arent something I need and therefore I may end up going the cam-only route for now. I can deal with lope, surge, and a dip in mileage, the car sees less than 3k miles a year. in fact the only cam side-effect that even concerns me is loss of torque, which im sure the LE2 still makes plenty of. Overall less hp or not, one route still costs $550 more.
LE1 heads = 850
difference = $550
Considering im on a college budget, i simply cannot justify spening more than a grand on heads at this point in my life, they arent something I need and therefore I may end up going the cam-only route for now. I can deal with lope, surge, and a dip in mileage, the car sees less than 3k miles a year. in fact the only cam side-effect that even concerns me is loss of torque, which im sure the LE2 still makes plenty of. Overall less hp or not, one route still costs $550 more.
Last edited by JoeliusZ28; Feb 17, 2007 at 03:01 PM.
You'd spend in around $2.5 - 3K for the heads/cam package and the supporting components;
and that's if you did the installs and tuning yourself.
I'm not sure how the LE2 cam would perform with stock heads.
You may want to stick with something a little more mild until you upgrade the heads.
Last edited by user 647483; Feb 17, 2007 at 03:31 PM.
I love my LE setup, but it sounds like a cam-only upgrade is the route for you at this point.
You'd spend in around $2.5 - 3K for the heads/cam package and the supporting components;
and that's if you did the installs and tuning yourself.
I'm not sure how the LE2 cam would perform with stock heads.
You may want to stick with something a little more mild until you upgrade the heads.
You'd spend in around $2.5 - 3K for the heads/cam package and the supporting components;
and that's if you did the installs and tuning yourself.
I'm not sure how the LE2 cam would perform with stock heads.
You may want to stick with something a little more mild until you upgrade the heads.
That order from Brett was about $936 by itself
(Granted, that included the cam itself)Most of the rest of my paycheck went to Summit LOL
Last edited by user 647483; Feb 17, 2007 at 03:42 PM.
My buddies 224/230 owns my LE2 cam down low. I actually just got a new cam from Bret because i don't like reving my car above 6200+ to make power and to me there was a big difference in low-midrange torque. Maybe Bret can come in and make a suggestion for you, but if you're never going to rev much above 6k the LE2 cam seems like a bad idea.
My buddies 224/230 owns my LE2 cam down low. I actually just got a new cam from Bret because i don't like reving my car above 6200+ to make power and to me there was a big difference in low-midrange torque. Maybe Bret can come in and make a suggestion for you, but if you're never going to rev much above 6k the LE2 cam seems like a bad idea.
Le2 cam is not a big cam...although my car kept going up to 7k no problem with it.
A general comment is, on the internet you see I did this for xxx$ low ball amount. There are a lot of hidden costs. Head and cam swap, getting it to run relialbly in a race car takes a bit.
A general comment is, on the internet you see I did this for xxx$ low ball amount. There are a lot of hidden costs. Head and cam swap, getting it to run relialbly in a race car takes a bit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 08:50 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 11, 2015 09:44 AM



