Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
I should have known better than to ask. I just figured since there were a bunch of people here talking about it, I might as well ask. But thanks, I now have a full understanding of the knock circuit. It just clicked all of a sudden, at least I hope it did.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Injuneer
The code is not set because you have 8-12deg knock retard. The code is set by the faulty knock sensor circuit, and the PCM defaults to the knock retard to protect the engine.
And you want to talk about costing hp. I unplugged my knock sensor at the track and went from 14.1 to 14.9.
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by jeepramz
And you want to talk about costing hp. I unplugged my knock sensor at the track and went from 14.1 to 14.9. 

Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Honda Hunter
So let me get this straight. So because you unplugged it it defaulted to protect the engine since it detected something wrong with the sensor? At that point it wasnt just pulling timing it went into a Knock protect mode? Am I even close?
I run my engine with an aftermarket ECU. I have no knock sensor. But my factory PCM is still connected, and running some things like idle air control, speedometer and emisions devices (well, it used to). I have a full-time readout on the stock PCM, and it shows knock retard values in the range of 3-12deg depending on how the engine is operating. It shows 3deg of knock retard at idle. Of course it has no affect on the engine, because the stock PCM is not controlling the fuel or timing.
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Instead of basing knock retard on the signal being received from the sensor, it started using a knock retard that was based on a calcualton or table, as a function of other engine operating parameters. That knock retard will show up on a scanner as exacly that - knock retard - whether its caused by the signal from a functional knock sensor, or caused by a protective default as a result of a non-working sensor.
I run my engine with an aftermarket ECU. I have no knock sensor. But my factory PCM is still connected, and running some things like idle air control, speedometer and emisions devices (well, it used to). I have a full-time readout on the stock PCM, and it shows knock retard values in the range of 3-12deg depending on how the engine is operating. It shows 3deg of knock retard at idle. Of course it has no affect on the engine, because the stock PCM is not controlling the fuel or timing.
I run my engine with an aftermarket ECU. I have no knock sensor. But my factory PCM is still connected, and running some things like idle air control, speedometer and emisions devices (well, it used to). I have a full-time readout on the stock PCM, and it shows knock retard values in the range of 3-12deg depending on how the engine is operating. It shows 3deg of knock retard at idle. Of course it has no affect on the engine, because the stock PCM is not controlling the fuel or timing.
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Lets say that I corrected my knock sensor circuit problem or whatever... If I am getting 3-12* of knock retard, that is normal? Wouldn't I get more power if I had 0* of knock retard all throughout the rpm range? Is it possible to get 0*?
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Kurt Crosbie
Lets say that I corrected my knock sensor circuit problem or whatever... If I am getting 3-12* of knock retard, that is normal? Wouldn't I get more power if I had 0* of knock retard all throughout the rpm range? Is it possible to get 0*?
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Kurt Crosbie
What are the chances that I would even detonate in the first place? Is detonation a risk you have to run to go fast?
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Kurt Crosbie
What are the chances that I would even detonate in the first place? Is detonation a risk you have to run to go fast?
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
What is a normal amount of knock retard to be getting with the works (full bolt-ons, huge cam, solid roller or roller rockers, longtubes, bullet mufflers, etc.)?
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
any knock above 3 degrees isn't too good cause you're gonna start to lose horsepower. If you're in the 1-3 range of knock retard i wouldn't worry about it.
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
Originally Posted by Kurt Crosbie
Lets say that I corrected my knock sensor circuit problem or whatever... If I am getting 3-12* of knock retard, that is normal? Wouldn't I get more power if I had 0* of knock retard all throughout the rpm range? Is it possible to get 0*?
If you correct the DTC 43, you should no longer get 3-12deg KR.
Why not set the kock retard values to zero since your computer can't do anything with it anyways?
-no MAF (its been deleted)
-no knock sensor (its been deleted)
-all the A4 codes (had to swap thwe M6 program to an A4 program to get the correct speedo reading out of the TH400 VSS)
-no injectors (there connected to the MoTec)
-no ICM continuity (don't use the stock ignition system)
-all the AC codes (AC deleted)
The PCM is basically a hollow shell that still runs:
-VSS
-IAC
-fuel pump
-fans
Re: Knock Sensor Desensitization using resistors
but if your circuit is in fine working condition and you're getting any retard, that means you have a problem that needs to be corrected, right?
Even with longtubes, roller rockers, and a huge cam, i can still get 0* of knock retard?
Even with longtubes, roller rockers, and a huge cam, i can still get 0* of knock retard?


