LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

knock retard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #16  
palehorse77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 227
So there is truth to there being OBD1 and OBD2 Knock Modules?
To my knowledge there is only 1 part # for the LT4 KM and there are OBD1 and OBD2 LT4's are there not? Techinically they were all 96's weren't they.
So did Bryan mention whether anything with regards to this or does any one have any data on the differences (knock retard results or technical)?

I did a OBD1 conversion as well and am also pulling upto 9* retard with the LT4 module. I know I still have the LT1 KM but it is a OBD2.

The fact that the 5300RPM point was consistent makes me think their is a correlation with the OBD1 switch.
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #17  
palehorse77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 227
Oops

**** -

My bad didn't realize I was in a search thread.
Old Aug 17, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #18  
mehoffz24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 550
From: monmouth county NJ
subscribing... good thread, please let us know what you find
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #19  
wrd1972's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,405
From: Kantuckee Yo'
I have tried two new LT4 KM's, both gave very wild KR all over the board. My LT1 KM is nearly KR free all over the board. I do not believe the LT4 KM is less sensitive.

I have even replaced the knock sensor with a new Delco one.

I am still waiting to get a dyno tune to reid the remaining KR.

Last edited by wrd1972; Sep 3, 2007 at 06:41 PM.
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #20  
dangalla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,092
From: lakeville, pa
so...
even though this thread is really old its pretty intresting

everyone says to swap in a lt4 km to reduce knock retard yet there is atleast two people in this thread that have seen the opposite results

anybody else have any input on this subject
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #21  
Irish350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 239
From: Tempe/Phoenix
yeah, im interested too.. i thought i was having some really bad knock retard, but it turns out it was something totally different ,but i had already ordered my lt4 km... so im wondering if its even worth installing.
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #22  
1982z28with18s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,743
From: Mission, Kansas
I ended up just turning off the knock retard completely, it was all false knock. Ironically we put that same motor in my buddies car and it did the same thing.
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #23  
palehorse77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 227
Since screwing up and reviving this old thread I've ran the LT1 KM for the OBD 1 and OBD2 as I've converted my OBD2 to a 1.

I'm still getting a max of 7* KR (lower the the 9 I was getting) but I think it is from drivetrain noise to be honest. So unfortuneately I don't have clean results to report. I want to run the car while up on jack stands and see if I can find the noise (then fix it) then I will run the car with all of the three different KM's to see which give me the best result. I'll let you know if I can ever get it done.
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 01:11 AM
  #24  
JP95ZM6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 746
From: Rochester Hills, MI
I ran both the stock LT1, and an LT4, Knock Modules lately. I had less idle and low throttle knock retard (KR) with the LT1, but showed a couple degrees of KR at WOT. With the LT4 module, I showed more KR at idle/low throttle, but NONE at WOT. I kept the LT4 installed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
94Maroz28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
30
Oct 27, 2015 04:38 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Sep 29, 2015 08:56 PM
SEOJustin
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
5
Sep 24, 2015 04:39 PM
asilomar244
LT1 Based Engine Tech
17
Jul 12, 2015 05:53 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.