LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

I need urgent help ASAP!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #1  
87camracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
I need urgent help ASAP!!!

Im trying to install 918s on a set of stock 95 LT1 heads for a cc306. Ive read all the threads that i can find and have the 918 springs, 614-16 locks, 759-16 retainers, and 4705-16 locators. Unless im reading my micrometer wrong (crane cams brand BTW) im not getting the correct install height. I accidently forgot to take the stock spring seat off and just put the comp seat on over the top of it and got a 1.72" install height. With the stock seat removed and just the comp seat installed, i get a 1.91" install height. What the hell am I doing wrong?

If someone can help me ASAP either on here or via AIM i would be greatly in debted to you. My AIM name is Nog736.
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #2  
95ttoplt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 411
What installed height are you trying to get??
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
87camracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Im trying for the recommended 1.80".

*EDIT* I just checked on the second valve, and if i put the stock spring seat under the comp seat i get 1.72" on it as well. Do i have to keep that in there? I wouldn't think so because it doesn't sit flush.
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #4  
95ttoplt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 411
So set them with the comp seat only and shim up to 1.80, whats the problem??
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #5  
87camracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by 95ttoplt1
So set them with the comp seat only and shim up to 1.80, whats the problem??
Everyone else thats ran this combination hasn't had to use shims. They all said it dropped right in to the correct install height. Shims wouldn't be a problem if others had said they needed it.
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #6  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
I'm pretty sure most people shim them to 1.78-1.80
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #7  
95ttoplt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 411
Well every car is different. I only had .520 clearance between the retainer and valve seal when I did mine.

And people on here had told me they just put on 987's. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

I think when people said they went right on they didn't check the installed height, or were referring to the fact that no machine work was nessasry.

There is nothing wrong with shimming the spring to the correct installed height.
Old May 13, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #8  
87camracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by 95ttoplt1
Well every car is different. I only had .520 clearance between the retainer and valve seal when I did mine.

And people on here had told me they just put on 987's. Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

I think when people said they went right on they didn't check the installed height, or were referring to the fact that no machine work was nessasry.

There is nothing wrong with shimming the spring to the correct installed height.
Yeah i'm well aware that nothing ever works like it's supposed to on these cars.

I realize also that shims aren't bad but I'm not sure if they go above or below my comp seats? If they go below i know where a set is and ill go pick them up right now.
Old May 13, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
Originally Posted by 87camracer
Yeah i'm well aware that nothing ever works like it's supposed to on these cars.

I realize also that shims aren't bad but I'm not sure if they go above or below my comp seats? If they go below i know where a set is and ill go pick them up right now.
Below....or under, always under
Old May 13, 2007 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
Loadre's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,887
From: Kingsport, TN
Are those the +.050 locks?
Old May 13, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #11  
87camracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 329
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by Loadre
Are those the +.050 locks?
yeah they are the +.050 locks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Devinfoote87
Parts For Sale
7
Sep 4, 2015 05:52 PM
asilomar244
LT1 Based Engine Tech
17
Jul 12, 2015 05:53 AM
MJ_Z28
Car Audio and Electronics
4
Aug 7, 2002 07:15 PM
mrgto
New England Area
12
Jun 17, 2002 07:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 PM.