LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

How does compression work with other variables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 10:14 PM
  #1  
glenb1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 374
From: Jacksonville, FL
How does compression work with other variables

i've been looking more and more into my build, and at this point not sure if i wanna go turbo or n/a. Lets say i build for a turbo compression wise, what do i have to do, having a 9.5:1 compression to be able to run the car? i never understood compression completely so any info on it can be helpful, in the mean time, google here i come.
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #2  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
9.5:1 will run NA, if you go big on the cam it may be a little soft on the bottomend lacking some torque and response but wont be too bad. Have to consider that for a LONG time all the OEM engines were in the 8s so 9.5 is still higher than a lot of engines that have been used over the years.

Some guys even built boosted LT1s at 8.x:1 compression, they just give up some of the response it could have had off boost.
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #3  
glenb1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 374
From: Jacksonville, FL
ok so i guess around 9.5:1 is a decent medium then. Cuz i wanan run this car as is first, sits its being compltetely rebuilt, and i wanna break it in and what not off boost, and take it to the track off boost. so i mean, do i have to run a higher octane gas or what? i just never understood why boosted engines need a lower compression as compared to n/a motors. and yea i noticed a lot of the stock 4 bangers are in the <9 area thats what brought this question up.
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
You need lower octane fuel when you lower the compression ratio. Be sure to evaluate the "dynamic compression ratio" (DCR), not just the static compression ratio.

"Boost" increases the pressure of the combustion chamber charge BEFORE it is compressed. Since compression ratio is the ratio of the pressure in the cylinder with the piston at TDC compared to the pressure in the cylinder at BDC, increasing the pressure at BDC will dramatically increase the pressure at TDC, leading to higher chances of detonation and the resulting damage it does. The compression process also increases the temperature of the air charge. Higher compression ratios increase the temperature when the piston reaches TDC. The hotter the air/fuel charge at this point, the more likely you will run into pre-ignition or detonation. That's why high boost applications require an after-cooler, or an alcohol or water injection system to reduce the air charge temperatures.
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
glenb1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 374
From: Jacksonville, FL
so having a 9.5:1 in n/a i shouldnt run 93 octane? but when i put the boost in it will be fine to run the 93? or do you mean more like going between race gas like 100 octane in a boosted app and 93 in a n/a app all at 9.5:1 SRC
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #6  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
In all likelyhood 87 would be fine NA and 93 once you boost it.

The b-body motors were 10:1 with iron heads and are fine on 87 octane, aluminum heads get away with more compression before detonation is an issue.
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
87bandit's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 660
From: Palm Harbor, FL
just remember boost costs a pretty penny and unless you have some decent hp goals or just really want a boosted setup you might want to reconsider
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 11:45 PM
  #8  
glenb1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 374
From: Jacksonville, FL
well at this point, im rebuilding the whole car. the motor is getting refreshened, and if i can build it to a low compression, and throw the boost on later but still drive it n/a for now then thats what imma do. since im doign the tuning and will have a laptop in the car i will save two tunes, one for boost and one for n/a. i have an intercooler, bov, manifolds, and a small t304 turbo. the turbo will likely get replaced with a 70-80 trim, and the t304 will either get sold or put on the subi when the camaro is done. my hp goals are around 400 on boost.
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #9  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by glenb1991
....... my hp goals are around 400 on boost.
You can EASILLY achieve 400rwHP on an NA LT1, without boost. If that's all you are after, you are going around it in completely the wrong way.
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #10  
glenb1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 374
From: Jacksonville, FL
yea i kno its possible n/a, but if i can get it n/a then throw boost into the equation later down the road with minimal adjustments and hit 5-600 territory then thats prolly what imma do.
Old Jan 10, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #11  
87bandit's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 660
From: Palm Harbor, FL
it's gonna be pretty hard to hit 400rwhp n/a on a boost friendly app imo
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AdsoYo
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
May 2, 2018 03:21 AM
Carogna'sZ-28
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
0
Feb 3, 2015 07:04 PM
Red_94Formula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 22, 2015 12:17 AM
jayblev95
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Jan 20, 2015 01:30 PM
ModdedNerd
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
1
Dec 25, 2014 05:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.