Hot Cam: before and after (READ!!)
Originally posted by Dean77
Check out the following links for pics of my motor, and some other LT1's we are presently working on:
My motor: http://www.nedyno.com/images/contest/pic4_large.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/marcs94z28/383coilpacks.html
http://www.96z28ss.cz28.com/images/jesel_rockers.jpg
Dean
www.nedyno.com
Check out the following links for pics of my motor, and some other LT1's we are presently working on:
My motor: http://www.nedyno.com/images/contest/pic4_large.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/marcs94z28/383coilpacks.html
http://www.96z28ss.cz28.com/images/jesel_rockers.jpg
Dean
www.nedyno.com
I appreciate your apology. I was just a little suspicious when I first read the post, but now everything it straightened out it definately seems like 95TA8280 was well taken care of. I can see how you were upset by my previous post.
The engines that you have worked on look good. It looks like you are creating yourself a monster!
I like the LT1 coil pack setup as well. It appears that all of your work is top notch. I would have more sitting under the hood of my car, but there's only so much a broke college student can do. My 383 build was completely unexpected due to a spun bearing. So far I'm well pleased with it and learned a lot during the build.
Originally posted by 95CamaroZ-28
My 383 build was completely unexpected due to a spun bearing. So far I'm well pleased with it and learned a lot during the build.
My 383 build was completely unexpected due to a spun bearing. So far I'm well pleased with it and learned a lot during the build.
John
95TA8280-
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
95TA8280-
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
95TA8280-
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
95TA8280-
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
95TA8280-
How are you now doing for fuel economy? I have an Lt4 stock cam and am still debating on going that way or an lt4 hotcam (gas milage is a pretty big issue with me) and with a higher rpm powerband... I'm still trying to decide. Also I'd love to see your new numbers.
I was pulling 17/27 before my o2's died and it got really cold, then it fell to 14.5mpg/23mpg
Do a set of 3.73's and a hotcam loose that much? I know I've got to sack mileage for power, I drive maybe 120 miles a week when not in classes in a week, with carpooling this semester I may stay under 180/week, maybe less... (so I can ditch quite a few mpg- if I fill up only once a week I'd be plenty happy) I'd rather be able to tune out some of the losses - which I hear helps - Someone told me a swap of lt4 hotcam, then tuned, was ONLY a loss of 2mpg city and about 2mpg hwy... (is that right???)
With intake/headers/catback and otherwise stock, what does an lt4 car get to the wheels? If lt1's with catback/headers/CAI are pulling 280-300rwhp, that would mean an lt4 with the same mods would get atleast 330rwhp, which would mean the lt4 heads +lt4 cam were worth the same as the hotcam kit alone power wise -- and the lt4 car would get better gas mileage because it isnt such an agressive cam, but it has the head work --- am I on crack here
?
Do a set of 3.73's and a hotcam loose that much? I know I've got to sack mileage for power, I drive maybe 120 miles a week when not in classes in a week, with carpooling this semester I may stay under 180/week, maybe less... (so I can ditch quite a few mpg- if I fill up only once a week I'd be plenty happy) I'd rather be able to tune out some of the losses - which I hear helps - Someone told me a swap of lt4 hotcam, then tuned, was ONLY a loss of 2mpg city and about 2mpg hwy... (is that right???)
With intake/headers/catback and otherwise stock, what does an lt4 car get to the wheels? If lt1's with catback/headers/CAI are pulling 280-300rwhp, that would mean an lt4 with the same mods would get atleast 330rwhp, which would mean the lt4 heads +lt4 cam were worth the same as the hotcam kit alone power wise -- and the lt4 car would get better gas mileage because it isnt such an agressive cam, but it has the head work --- am I on crack here
?
Last edited by Geoff Chadwick; Feb 4, 2003 at 01:06 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
Drtryder
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Apr 22, 2015 04:17 PM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 16, 2002 07:48 PM
dmaastr
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 1, 2002 02:22 PM



