LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

high RWHP cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #1  
elisowski's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 271
From: Canfield, OH
high RWHP cars

Can you guys post your RWHP and the max airflow you guys are seing (AFGS or CFM)?


I'm trying to find a correlation between RWHP and AFGS (air flow grams/sec).

I've been told you should have 1 AFGS per RWHP. Any truth to that?
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 10:56 AM
  #2  
JP95ZM6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 746
From: Rochester Hills, MI
Well, I recently did a run on the street to 5000 RPM, and hit 250 AFg/s. I make 348 HP at 5000RPM (cutout closed), so for mine it's only about 0.72 g/s/hp. Sorry I couldn't hold it longer, but I try not to do triple digits around here except in a tuning emergency!
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #3  
MTL_Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 885
From: Montreal, Quebec
That makes sense... My car just dyno'd about 340 RWHP peak a couple of weeks ago and makes peak 330-340 g/s at the MAF according to my datamaster logs. Curious to see what others have to say.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
401 AFGS at 6700rpm with a little over 400rwhp on a stock MAF. It dropped to 314 AFGS with a ported MAF.
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
The powerful ones peg the MA.

Rich
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #6  
rock1501's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 838
From: ajax ontario canada
sorry to hijack but I was wondering with the setup in my sig should I upgrade the maf or should the stock one be ok for like 500 rwhp n/a or so
I cant spray with the new cam I put in anyway
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #7  
Grease's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 870
From: Cuyahoga Falls, OHIO
Originally Posted by rock1501
sorry to hijack but I was wondering with the setup in my sig should I upgrade the maf or should the stock one be ok for like 500 rwhp n/a or so
I cant spray with the new cam I put in anyway
With the size of your motor, heads, cam and single plane you might want to think about a speed density tune or better yet a FAST or Accel ECU. I doubt a aftermarket MAF will make a difference.
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 05:52 PM
  #8  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
****ty cell-phone video Click here to watch 0409071435

I made 405/371 and trapped 118 in a full weight car. I think I was getting valve float past 5800 in that video though so thats probably why it started jumpin around.
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #9  
rock1501's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 838
From: ajax ontario canada
Originally Posted by Grease
With the size of your motor, heads, cam and single plane you might want to think about a speed density tune or better yet a FAST or Accel ECU. I doubt a aftermarket MAF will make a difference.
I will be for next year but funds are kinda tight right now
actually since I have a old school distributer I only use the stock computer for fuel management.I might just throw a carb on next year and just run everything with the digital7 msd
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #10  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
To be honest it all depends on with MAF table calibration you go off of. At 600RWHP mine was only at 430.
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #11  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Originally Posted by Grease
With the size of your motor, heads, cam and single plane you might want to think about a speed density tune or better yet a FAST or Accel ECU. I doubt a aftermarket MAF will make a difference.
Problem with that is Ed Wright's 520rwhp monster only gained single digits going to speed density, and I would put money on it that his car was tuned better than 99% of other cars out there. That was 520rwhp through an 8" ATI and 4L60E so it is a stout motor to say the least.
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #12  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by elisowski
Can you guys post your RWHP and the max airflow you guys are seing (AFGS or CFM)?


I'm trying to find a correlation between RWHP and AFGS (air flow grams/sec).

I've been told you should have 1 AFGS per RWHP. Any truth to that?
MAF tables are not linear. There is no correlation between AFGS and HP.

After a dyno pull, you may be able to find a correlation but only at that point of max HP referencing the MAF. Beyond that, forget it.
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #13  
chrism400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 890
From: Dayton, OH
Originally Posted by OneFlyn95z28
To be honest it all depends on with MAF table calibration you go off of. At 600RWHP mine was only at 430.
Yeah, there might be a little influence there by the nitrous you were sniffin'.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve69SS396
Track Kill Stories
15
Aug 10, 2015 02:45 PM
LT14LIFE
Parts For Sale
13
Feb 9, 2015 09:35 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 4, 2014 11:56 AM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 24, 2014 03:37 PM
Queens94z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Nov 20, 2014 06:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.