head cc ######
head cc ######
i got lt1 heads that are ported and shaved 10 thou what would the combustion chamber cc be approx?
what are the stock cc?
at 56cc my motor will be 12.09:1 compression
what are the stock cc?
at 56cc my motor will be 12.09:1 compression
Originally posted by Prorac1
stock lt1 heads are 58 cc....
stock lt1 heads are 58 cc....
) Anyway, to blanket ALL LT1 heads as being 58cc without an asterick would be misleading.
Last edited by arnie; Jun 15, 2003 at 09:28 AM.
Originally posted by Prorac1
stock lt1 heads are 58 cc, so your compression will be under 11.9, but i think on pump gas your still screwed
stock lt1 heads are 58 cc, so your compression will be under 11.9, but i think on pump gas your still screwed
with 58cc my compression is
11.78:1
Just cuz someone posts figures, doesn't make them accurate.
......but range from 53-58?
Consider that the range of ACCURACY of various posts.
However, (and this has been posted several times here) oem blocks AND heads are assembled with extra stock on their respective surfaces. Figure .015-.020" on average. Without exception? No, but in a small minority.
I edited this post to rephrase one sentence to make my point more clearly understood. By that I should have stated that is the range of INACCURACY of various posts. My range would be from 54, (which is unlikely) to 57 1/2 (with .020" extra stock on head).
......but range from 53-58?
Consider that the range of ACCURACY of various posts.
However, (and this has been posted several times here) oem blocks AND heads are assembled with extra stock on their respective surfaces. Figure .015-.020" on average. Without exception? No, but in a small minority.
I edited this post to rephrase one sentence to make my point more clearly understood. By that I should have stated that is the range of INACCURACY of various posts. My range would be from 54, (which is unlikely) to 57 1/2 (with .020" extra stock on head).
Last edited by arnie; Jun 15, 2003 at 05:54 PM.
It's not 58cc. I've always used 54cc for a good starting point, but, measuring is always best.
Many cars on this board(mine included) have run mid 11:1 compression on pump gas with no problem. Over 12 is pushing your luck though.
Many cars on this board(mine included) have run mid 11:1 compression on pump gas with no problem. Over 12 is pushing your luck though.
Originally posted by Josh-'97 WS6
It's not 58cc. I've always used 54cc for a good starting point, but, measuring is always best.
Many cars on this board(mine included) have run mid 11:1 compression on pump gas with no problem. Over 12 is pushing your luck though.
It's not 58cc. I've always used 54cc for a good starting point, but, measuring is always best.
Many cars on this board(mine included) have run mid 11:1 compression on pump gas with no problem. Over 12 is pushing your luck though.
Originally posted by arnie
That starting point that you state you use; I'm interested in knowing whether you have achieved that figure with accurate measuring, or is your starting point just a estimate/guess? Also, are you measuring the various volumes accurately to arrive at the 'mid 11:1' ratio, or again, is that an estimate?
That starting point that you state you use; I'm interested in knowing whether you have achieved that figure with accurate measuring, or is your starting point just a estimate/guess? Also, are you measuring the various volumes accurately to arrive at the 'mid 11:1' ratio, or again, is that an estimate?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Aug 26, 2017 02:52 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM



