LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Hardened Pushrods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 11:11 PM
  #61  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
At least you know who I was calling ignorant.

Bret
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:04 AM
  #62  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
No... I'm lucky AND ignorant. I can live with that since my setup parallels and in most cases, has exceeded your best effort in comparison.

P.S. Oh yeah.. done with HARDENED pushrods FTMFW!

Last edited by SS RRR; Feb 13, 2007 at 12:11 AM.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:13 AM
  #63  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by SS RRR
No... I'm lucky AND ignorant. I can live with that since my setup parallels and in most cases, has exceeded your best effort in comparison.

P.S. Oh yeah.. done with HARDENED pushrods FTMFW!
Whats your car run? I'm not bashing just curious.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #64  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Whats your car run? I'm not bashing just curious.
12.0 @ 115 1.75 60' w/ the 211/219 cam and LPE heads/intake, Hooker LT's, ORY, full exhaust, Ed Wright dyno tune, 3750lb race weight on BFG DR's.

That was four years ago. Haven't done anything significant enough to post since then.

You have some great mph. Best I've seen on this board using a BRE cam. Doesn't mean you're the only one running it, but like I said... it's rare to see anyone over 115/6mph with LE/BRE stuff. I'm not sure you'll be able to get more out of them if they're re-done, but I guess you'll see. Hopefully it won't hurt what has already been done. I don't know of a lot of heads these days that can accomdate that kind of mph w/ any LT1 type street cams...

Last edited by SS RRR; Feb 13, 2007 at 12:40 AM.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #65  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by SS RRR
12.0 @ 115 1.75 60' w/ the 211/219 cam and LPE heads/intake, Hooker LT's, ORY, full exhaust, Ed Wright dyno tune, 3750lb race weight on BFG DR's.

That was four years ago. Haven't done anything significant enough to post since then.

You have some great mph. I'm not sure you'll be able to get more out of them if they're re-done, but I guess you'll see. Hopefully it won't hurt what has already been done. I don't know of a lot of heads these days that can accomdate that kind of mph w/ any LT1 type street cams...
Well my heads have stock valves, so I should pick up some power just from that. + some my valve guides have some slop in them, and my valves look like they may not have been sealing perfect. Who knows though, you really can't tell that much from looking at heads, the ones that look the worst might perform the best. I just want to break 11's @120, hopefully my bottom end is ok. 12.0@115 is moving for such a baby cam too, expecially at 3750 lbs.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:41 AM
  #66  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by speed_demon24
Well my heads have stock valves, so I should pick up some power just from that. + some my valve guides have some slop in them, and my valves look like they may not have been sealing perfect. Who knows though, you really can't tell that much from looking at heads, the ones that look the worst might perform the best. I just want to break 11's @120, hopefully my bottom end is ok. 12.0@115 is moving for such a baby cam too, expecially at 3750 lbs.
Thank you.
You'd be one of the top dawgs around here running that kind of mph on a stock bottom end.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 12:46 AM
  #67  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Thank you.
You'd be one of the top dawgs around here running that kind of mph on a stock bottom end.
Thanks. I honestly think its the mail order tunes that holds everyone back. They are good for getting you running, but without having the car infront of you there really is no way to get it perfect, its a hit or miss thing.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 03:33 AM
  #68  
Jon A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 482
From: Mukilteo, WA
Originally Posted by SS RRR
Even though I spun it to 6200rpm
Holy cow! You wildman! I had no idea you had so much experience running on the very ragged edge. I now see why you are the expert in valvetrain durability--it's based upon pushing the limits farther than anybody ever has before.... Err, well, nevermind, I forgot I actually reved my stock engine that high quite often without problem.

Old Feb 13, 2007 | 05:53 AM
  #69  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by Jon A
Holy cow! You wildman! I had no idea you had so much experience running on the very ragged edge. I now see why you are the expert in valvetrain durability--it's based upon pushing the limits farther than anybody ever has before.... Err, well, nevermind, I forgot I actually reved my stock engine that high quite often without problem.

Yeah I'm crazy like that. I would've gone further, but the RV cam had no more umph after that.

Last edited by SS RRR; Feb 13, 2007 at 06:21 AM.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #70  
Z-RATED94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,557
From: Carol Stream, Il.
SS RRR, not a bad 60 for a M6 and a stock rearend. Dare I say you didn't try that to often? Or do you push your luck with the stock rearend also? Ever dyno your set-up? Yeah, I know dyno #s don't mean squat, but it would help me figure out where I'm at, HP versus track times. Thanks.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #71  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Let's see 115mph and I've had guys do 11's easy with 120+mph with hyd roller cams, 350's in 3500lbs+ cars.... yep that's the same. :eyes: Let's not forget about 4000+lbs impallas going 11.5's @ 118mph. Maybe you should look around some more.

Bret
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #72  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Originally Posted by SS RRR
I knew you couldn't live w/out getting in a cheap jab. LOL... You can preach on all you want. The FACT OF THE MATTER is I have supplied a link to hardened pushrods that WORK for mild applications such as the 211 cam or hotcam. It's not an opinion. It's a fact. Sorry you have such a complex that you can't get over this and move on.
Thanks for your efforts, but you will not convince me otherwise from what has worked for me for 8+ years.
Your argument isn't even valid, its just dandy that your cheap hardened pushrods lasted you for so long without any issues. There have been a number of examples of cheap hardened pushrods including OEM that have failed to last. So what exactly is your argument? Its already been stated that for some people they last, but not everybody....From what i have read here the initial warning was spend the extra couple bucks now on a better part so the chances of failure are minimized. I also bent a cheap hardened pushrod, one was in my LT1 with CC503 cam/6500 rev limit, and another in my 5.0 mustang. So theres 2 examples to your one on my own personal cars.

I guess if your a gambling man, then go ahead be cheap, save a couple bucks and take your chances...personally I wouldn't but really its your choice.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #73  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Let's see 115mph and I've had guys do 11's easy with 120+mph with hyd roller cams, 350's in 3500lbs+ cars.... yep that's the same. :eyes: Let's not forget about 4000+lbs impallas going 11.5's @ 118mph. Maybe you should look around some more.

Bret
Looks around some more
Can't seem to locate a whole lot of that around here! I see ALOT of dyno numbers floating around, but no ET's.

Originally Posted by Z-RATED94
SS RRR, not a bad 60 for a M6 and a stock rearend. Dare I say you didn't try that to often? Or do you push your luck with the stock rearend also? Ever dyno your set-up? Yeah, I know dyno #s don't mean squat, but it would help me figure out where I'm at, HP versus track times. Thanks.
370rwhp/355rwtq
Originally Posted by 89385formula
Your argument isn't even valid,
My argument is just as valid by stating there are hardened pushrods out there that WORK for a mild setup as yours is claiming they don't. As a matter of fact those who say they don't work are in a minority compared to those setups that have used them successfully. Think about that one. We've already been through this. Sorry you were late to the party.
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #74  
mdacton's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,970
From: Goochland, Va.
yalll argue like a bunch of old ladies...you remind me of the golden girls
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #75  
89385formula's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,114
From: New York
Originally Posted by SS RRR
My argument is just as valid by stating there are hardened pushrods out there that WORK for a mild setup as yours is claiming they don't. As a matter of fact those who say they don't work are in a minority compared to those setups that have used them successfully. Think about that one. We've already been through this. Sorry you were late to the party.
I suppose what i was saying is that my argument is 2x as good as yours because i showed that cheap hardened pushrods fail quite often, since it happened twice to me personally. Whereas you had 1 engine combo that worked with them....not 2, so i guess its that simple.

I think your arguing for the sake of argument, regardless of whether or not your mild combo worked well for you, and your cheap hardened pushrods did or didn't fail, would you not agree for someone building another engine or valvetrain, that it would be worth the additional money for piece of mind knowing that you have a better part that is less prone to failure for a marginal cost? $50 extra for better pushrods>$xxx+ for engine damage.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.